With NBW coming out, looking to upgrade (up to $3-4K)

Your not going to get much of a different between 1k and 4k if your only concerned with gaming and not focused only on FPS to raise your epeen.

I'd recommend going with an Intel desktop with a good dedicated graphic card. Something in the 700's series, amd cards are getting better too so either way you will be golden.

A good example of GPU prices and performance so you get the idea of what extra money gets you:

Titan: 1,000 +, best card to date
760: 250, bottom graphics card of this generation for nvidia.

To the end user not watching the FPS with a monitor that doesn't have a ridiculously high res the difference between the two cards isn't much despite the different in the price. The same could be said for the processor, unless we are talking the 8 core intel non gaming related workhouse machine.

The best thing for you to do is shop around and when you see something you like post it on here and see others think. If it has a dedicated graphic card and a decent processor it will not have any trouble with civ. We just want to make sure that the computer you do choose will be able to run civ 6 without any problems. This could all be done for under 1,000.

Oh, and the only thing I'd recommend that could make prebuilt computers a little hard is a SSD for your OS/games. They have really came down in price and it makes a huge difference in loading times. Only bad thing about is that doesn't normally come with the already put together systems. You could get it custom built but that would up the cost since you are paying the builder. It is like buying a house or having a house built. In most cases it will cost more to have a house built the way you want it rather than following the builders original plan. If you plan to use it for 4 years it might be worth it to look at the custom build option. Go to at least 3 different places and get quotes on what you want and see how much it will cost them to build it with warranty and everything else you might need and want before deciding who your going to use.
 
I also *highly* recommend an SSD. Biggest bang for the buck you can purchase for speeding up games. Specifically, you'll want something called Intel SRT, which avoids the whole hassle of having to use your SSD like a hard drive. This is available on later motherboards.

Putting together a computer is *very* easy, especially now that there are so many handy tutorials all over the internet. And it'll save you thousands of dollars over the long run if you like PC games. If you've got 4k to spend, I'd recommend spending 1.5k on a new BLAZING PC, and 0k on an education in PC building via Google. It's really, I promise, not that hard.

And think of how many times you can say to yourself: I just saved 1000 dollars? You can now do that every 3-4 years.
 
Have you tried setting the game to not use multi-threading? Support for multi-threading was introduced in G&K, and disabling it has been known to speed things up for some people. (Go to C:\Users\<user>\Documents\My Games\Sid Meier's Civilization 5, open the "config" file and change "EnableGameCoreThreading = 1" to "EnableGameCoreThreading = 0")

Yeah, I tried this, but it didn't help. For those who aren't following this sub-thread, I have a Dell system: 4GB RAM, AMD Athlon IIx4630 processor (2.8 GHz), ATI Radeon HD4200 video card.

Since my other specs seem to meet or exceed what's recommended for BNW, my assumption is that replacing my integrated graphics card with a dedicated one would do the trick. If so, what would people recommend, given my overall system?
 
I also *highly* recommend an SSD. Biggest bang for the buck you can purchase for speeding up games. Specifically, you'll want something called Intel SRT, which avoids the whole hassle of having to use your SSD like a hard drive. This is available on later motherboards.

Just to elaborate on this point - you will speed up loading times, but you will not be seeing any FPS increases.

I would recommend against using SRT unless you are very tech-averse. The greatest performance benefits of using an SSD are going to come from using it as a system disk where you have your OS as well as your most commonly installed applications/games installed on.
 
Yeah, I tried this, but it didn't help. For those who aren't following this sub-thread, I have a Dell system: 4GB RAM, AMD Athlon IIx4630 processor (2.8 GHz), ATI Radeon HD4200 video card.

Since my other specs seem to meet or exceed what's recommended for BNW, my assumption is that replacing my integrated graphics card with a dedicated one would do the trick. If so, what would people recommend, given my overall system?

Your video card is a huge bottleneck. Spend $150 on a video card and you'll feel like you have an entirely new machine, as far as graphics go.
 
Your video card is a huge bottleneck. Spend $150 on a video card and you'll feel like you have an entirely new machine, as far as graphics go.

Thanks. To be specific, the problems I've had in G&K (apart from lower quality graphics in general) is a lag in shifting from one unit to another. This is what made it unplayable, and was completely resolved by shifting to strategic view.

If a new video card should resolve this, do you recommend any in particular?
 
I've said earlier I prefer mid-tier. I think I'm running a GeForce 650. The 650ti is a decent card, and they may be on the 700 series already, not sure.

Given the rest of your computer is somewhat older, no point in going over $150 IMO. I've built and modified many computers and the jump from old and/or low-end to new mid-range is far more than from mid-range to top-tier IMO.

+1 to Nials, I use the Tom's guides to refresh my knowledge of current technologies whenever I'm about to build a new computer. Excellent resource.
 
You are probably right. An AMD Athlon II X4 630 is probably going to be a bit of a bottleneck, so there's not much point in going very high-end.

Another relevant question would be to ask which resolution is being used?

EDIT: The 700 series are out, but there's no good lower midrange option yet. The recently released 760 is a strong card for the money, but probably way overkill for Txurce's PC.
 
What is your budget? Tom's Hardware does a nice list of video card recommendations for various budgets each month.

I'm trying to go as cheap as possible to run BNW graphics at medium settings, given the age of my machine. I will check the Tom's link - thanks a lot.

Edit: does this answer your question about resolution?

I've said earlier I prefer mid-tier. I think I'm running a GeForce 650. The 650ti is a decent card, and they may be on the 700 series already, not sure.

Given the rest of your computer is somewhat older, no point in going over $150 IMO. I've built and modified many computers and the jump from old and/or low-end to new mid-range is far more than from mid-range to top-tier IMO.

+1 to Nials, I use the Tom's guides to refresh my knowledge of current technologies whenever I'm about to build a new computer. Excellent resource.

Thanks for the specific recommendations, Scarpa.
 
After checking on Tom's, do you guys have preferences among the following for my rig, playing on medium settings?

Radeon 7750 ($105) vs 7770 ($115) vs gtx 650ti ($130)
 
What is the resolution of your LCD monitor?

It isn't so much that one "looks best". You run at the highest that the machine can sustain. More always looks better.
 
Resolution as in the screen resolution that your monitor displays. For instance, FullHD is 1920x1080 pixels. The higher, the better, but higher resolutions need more video card processing power.

In Civ V, you can check it under video settings.
 
It's probably better to look in Windows if possible. Games don't always default to the current Windows resolution.

Civ V may do that nicely, but it might also be running at an incorrect default.
 
What is the resolution of your LCD monitor?

It isn't so much that one "looks best". You run at the highest that the machine can sustain. More always looks better.

Resolution as in the screen resolution that your monitor displays. For instance, FullHD is 1920x1080 pixels. The higher, the better, but higher resolutions need more video card processing power.

In Civ V, you can check it under video settings.

I have a Dell 2408WFP monitor whose recommended Windows (and Civ 5) settings are 1920x1200 (@59Hz says Civ 5).
 
That's a nice monitor.

Since you're running that resolution, I would get at least a GTX 650 Ti.
 
Back
Top Bottom