digitalcraft
Warlord
That doesn't convince me you're right so much as that you're stubborn.
Was that directed to me?
In that case there's no interesting discussion. We all know the arguments in favor of Ramesses and HC. We all know what cheesy strategies they can do. In terms of straight SP-power I simply rate Ramesses AP-cheese as so superior that I feel obliged to rate him #1. If someone disagrees I can understand(since HC is very versatile and does AP-victory pretty good too), but I will never change my mind on Ramesses as #1.
That doesn't convince me you're right so much as that you're stubborn.
Generally, the play style there emphasises using tech to gain an advantage in the middle or late game, not early rushes or warfare.
Those civs and their three UUs, eh?
Agreed on this one. IND is, IMHO, a mid-level trait, and even lower than mid-level if you're a big warmonger who plans on just letting the AI build the wonders while you build soldiers and take the wonders for yourself. In some scenarios I almost think the double-production Forge is more helpful
FIN, ORG, PHI, these are all top level traits in my books. Some would replace PHI with CHA or EXP, and I wouldn't argue too loudly. IND doesn't quite make the cut.
Gee, i wonder why that might be. Perhaps it might have something to do with the settings? Just a little bit?
The best 2 mover UU and fast workers are regarded well there! Imagine that !
What settings???
The only ones I can think of is high maintenance and lush maps, which do occur but are hardly the rule.
I don't see your point on Egypt/India?
Industrious is a very powerful and flexible trait. I've heard arguments that it's the best economic trait.
I'm curious about this - is it mainly because of fail gold?