Search results

I have never used a Civ IV mod before and just downloaded one. Could someone please tell me what I'm supposed to do with it now? It's a zip file (that I unzipped) and I have BTS. Thank you.

Oh! Sorry. I have also been looking at Civ III mods. :blush:

I have never used a Civ IV mod before and just downloaded one. Could someone please tell me what I'm supposed to do with it now? It's a zip file (that I unzipped) and I have BTS. Thank you.

And the lightbulb just goes off.... I need to try to find my brain because it apparently wandered off somewhere. :crazyeye: Someone had already built the Manhattan Project so of course I wasn't able to. And since I had no Aluminum I couldn't build weapons. :hammer2: Thanks again to everyone.

Although perhaps it doesn't matter because even if I could build the Manhattan Project it wouldn't do me any good. Further research shows that any missile that can be built requires aluminum, and while I have plenty of Uranium, I don't have any aluminum. Thank you for your assistance. I...

None of my cities can build the Manhattan Project and all are connected to my 3 sources of Uranium. No-one else has built it yet since I can't build nuclear weapons. I'm very confused.

In my current game I would like to build Nuclear weapons. According to the Civilopedia all I need is Fission and Uranium in order to build the Manhattan Project. I have both but am still unable to build it. I have seen discussions here that mention needing aluminum also but that is not...

I see this all the time - lots of prime, unclaimed land in the modern era (not just tundra and desert). I typically play on warlord or prince and on Huge Pangea maps. Perhaps it is related to lower difficulty levels of play.

Thanks everyone. I think I'll try Egypt my next game. So far in my current game I'm managing to hang in there playing as Caesar on Prince. Prince is actually a step up for me - I've been playing on warlord but find it to be to easy. (While in Civ III I couldn't manage anything harder than...

I was wondering people's opinion of the best Civ to play as if you are a peaceful player. In Civ III I usually played as Babylon but for Civ V I haven't found one I prefer yet. I seem to get poor results when I play as Montezuma or Caesar though. I have not yet purchased the Babylon or Korea...

Unpatched Civ 4 runs quite well on my computer, the only real problem I have is occasional CTD's while playing huge maps. (Thank Firaxis for autosave :) ) After I installed the patch I didn't notice any difference, but once I got to the 1600's (huge map) my framerate slowed way down, movement...

I installed the patch earlier today and have spent most of the day playing civ. I have yet to find any Barbarian cities where before the patch I would find them quite frequently. Has anyone else noticed this or is this perhaps a problem with the map type I am playing on (Highlands, huge map)?

I also recieved a crc error from the patch I downloaded from civfanatics. I deleted it and re-downloaded from FileFront and had no problems with the installation.

In my most recent game I recieved a settler while playing on warlord difficulty. It was a huge, great plains map too. The settler appeared all the way accross the map from the rest of my nation :cry: . It was either take 40 turns to cross the map with it or settle where it was.

On two separate occasions I have had units fortified in a city as the sole defense of the city (it's fairly early in the game and I havn't had a chance to build more defenders). Barbarians will enter my land and the units will automatically attack the invaders, leaving the city defenceless.(and...

Radeon X600 ATI driver (ati2dvag) I've had no problems - it runs great. :)

I just picked up a pre-sell version at the Gamestop on Everett Mall Way in Everett, WA. :goodjob: I had ordered one from Amazon (which I have now cancelled). It looks great. Now I have to get offline so I can install it and play.:D