Tani Coyote
Reaction score
111

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • I would suggest you do let me set my role as NPC GM. Putting it to vote might not be honouralbe when you have already committed me to the duty as NPC GM for MP4. I am willing to be flexible and change the list if it is set to a different era; I can save the original list for another game. However I am still issued that you keep me as your NPC GM: you might find that by giving me experience I might be able to set my own IOTs in the future... which will help you as well, especilly as my setting plans in mind if I do a future IOT may prove intresting.

    Anyway: as I am set as your NPC GM for MP4 I will make a cast if it is set in a era that will reflect the nature of the era.
    Hey, if I make a special exception for you, will you join my IOT?

    I will allow you to play as a furry :P

    Normally I wouldn't bow to such desperate measures, but I'm like a hooker doing illicit things to get some more drugs..

    I'll do.. anything for more players *wink* *nudge*

    Anyway, consider it at least. Thanks! ~PF
    Welfare is absolutely less bad than war, yes. Of course, I'd rather eliminate them both, but if I had to choose between the two... yeah, I'll take the socialist commies over the fascist imperialists:mischief:


    I know the top tax rate was at one time 90%, which frankly strikes me as immoral, although there were also more loopholes back then.
    I don't necessarily think Obama is all that liberal, but he's not a far-right conservative. I don't know how serious he is about his debt ceiling rhetoric though. I don't think anyone who wants to keep expaning our debt can be that far-right wing.

    I believe in free trade and think that that is likely to reduce war as well. Of course, when you have the strongest military in the world, which the US is, pretty much any war you're in is your fault.

    I'd disagree with you on government's job being to make sure everyone has money, and I think that for them to do so is counterproductive.
    My biggest issue is not the economy, although maybe that's because I'm young. Foreign policy is my #1. All the wealth in the world doesn't matter if we end up destroying ourselves... or everyone else.

    Income will shift downward when we quit corporate welfare and bailouts. Than companies that fail will actually fail and they'll be forced to be smarter in the future, which helps everyone.

    Obama may be a social liberal, but he's an authoritarian social liberal. I don't even think he's necessarily that left wing (Although there's no way he's as far right as PC says he is) but he's a diehard authoritarian.

    I still preferred him over Romney, because the Republicans are diehard warmongerers and the Democrats are more moderate warmongerers. But the only way I'd have voted between the two, even if I were old enough, is if somebody put a gun to my head.
    Well, if you've got a liberal budget bill that also includes gay marriage for some weird reason, any fiscal liberals that oppose gay marriage, and any fiscal conservative who supports gay marriage will also vote no.

    That said, what I mean by ranking issues is which issues you consider most important when deciding who to vote for, not when deciding what to do in congress at a given time.

    I was a bit surprised to see you opposing regulation, I thought you agreed with the Republicans more on fiscal policy. Have your views changed?

    I frankly find Obama's recent comments about executive orders and no compromises on debt ceiling to be quite scary. I don't buy into the rhetoric, and I have no doubt Romney would have been similar (I'm still holding out hope on the son of Paul for 2016, which required an Obama victory this time) but I don't see how anyone can seriously support the President right now.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top Bottom