In my Law Enforcement class the prof actually put this on as the bonus question. He told us the story and asked us if we would rule it as a suicide or homicide.
If it wasn't for the fact that the man loaded the gun hoping his father would shoot his mother I might say homicide, but because the man was conspiring to commit murder - and his plan backfired and killed him - I would say he is guilty of killing himself, I.E. suicide.
I didn't realize what was going on or happened beforehand would even matter. I thought the law worked by looking at the shooter as being a neutral entity, and the victim a neutral entity and then decided whether the shooting was intended or accidental and then labeled as homicide or involuntary manslaughter.
well the "loading the gun, hoping his dad might one day pull the trigger" bit is mere conjecture, though, right? that is an assumption that can hardly be proven.
I'd go with involuntary manslaughter, if only because that sounds right to me. I have no actual knowledge of any law other than... well... none, to be honest.
charge the old man for the attempted murder of his wife. i see no need to charge him for the murder of the son. the son got his wish (he died), why should the old man pay for that?
charge the old man for the attempted murder of his wife. i see no need to charge him for the murder of the son. the son got his wish (he died), why should the old man pay for that?
It says in the article that most people that try to suicide and fail won't try it again, and that there was a safety net just below the guy when he was shot.
well the "loading the gun, hoping his dad might one day pull the trigger" bit is mere conjecture, though, right? that is an assumption that can hardly be proven.
I'd go with involuntary manslaughter, if only because that sounds right to me. I have no actual knowledge of any law other than... well... none, to be honest.
Actually, i think this may just justify its own class.... Involuntary suicide? And I agree with the bit about the father, there's no way they could prove that.
well the suicide attempt was pretty intentional, I'd say. assuming of course that we accept the premise that the son did not know about the net and did not want to merely make some kind of statement.
but you do raise an interesting point I did not even think about. if I were to take my own life I'd be pretty stringent on deciding on how I would go. some methods would certainly be more appealing to me than others yet the end result certainly remains the same. I might not even make the correct decision on how to go about it and an "intervention" such as the one in the OP might be more along the lines of what I had been envisioning. or not at all.
how do you judge that? does anybody even have a case? you certainly can't question the recently deceased though the way he wanted to do it was probably the hardest and most personal question he ever asked himself and you somehow have to respect that decision...
erm... welcome to the humour part of CFC. sorry about that.
A 17-year-old boy, Sydney Barringer, attempts suicide by jumping off the roof of his apartment building; this attempt became a "successful homicide" when he was accidentally shot by his mother (Miriam Margolyes) as he fell past his own apartment window. His parents regularly argued and threatened each other with a shotgun that was normally kept unloaded. Unbeknownst to them, Sydney had loaded the gun a few days earlier hoping they would make good on their threats to kill one another. As a result, he unwittingly became an accomplice in his own murder. The irony is that a newly installed protective netting for window washers on the building's exterior below their apartment would have saved his life if he had not been hit by the shotgun blast that he himself had loaded.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.