2014.04.28 I have solved the twin prime conjecture.

While I seriously doubt I will see any of the great mathematics problems solved on CFC, it would be great fun if one was!
 
While I seriously doubt I will see any of the great mathematics problems solved on CFC, it would be great fun if one was!

I would not say this is a great math problem as most mathematicians hold it to be true even in absence of a concise proof.

Thoughts:
... 1) I know the math is true, I am trying to make it digestible.
... 2) My personal pursuit is a problem I do consider great, The Riemann Hypothesis.
... 3) By pursuing indivisibility, this equation relates the set of primes to residues of e^(2pi1i) ... [1/2 + 1i/2].

Regardless the outcome, math is fun 8)
 
I would not say this is a great math problem as most mathematicians hold it to be true even in absence of a concise proof.

Thoughts:
... 1) I know the math is true, I am trying to make it digestible.
... 2) My personal pursuit is a problem I do consider great, The Riemann Hypothesis.
... 3) By pursuing indivisibility, this equation relates the set of primes to residues of e^(2pi1i) ... [1/2 + 1i/2].

Regardless the outcome, math is fun 8)

I'm not sure I agree with the bolded statement: mathematicians (particularly pure mathematicians) are not fans of assumption.

As for your various proofs, it's been several years since I was at university so everything beyond the maths I teach is a bit of a blur. It would take me more time than I've got to try and dissect and understand what you've posted.
 
It's the sort of stuff I used to do every day, but it's hard to read when written out in pure ASCII. Plus, yeah, I haven't looked at the stuff in years.

I used to think math was fun, but then I had to do advanced university-level calculus, statistics, linear algebra, and other fun things. It almost drove me to insanity.
 
I used to think math was fun, but then I had to do advanced university-level calculus, statistics, linear algebra, and other fun things. It almost drove me to insanity.

My experience was much the same... so I went back to (teach) the stuff I found fun.
 
[edit 2014.10.11] >>> ERROR <<<
The argument, "2014.09.30 for consideration", fails in the superset.
The subset, (P!/2)*(2*I+-1)+-2^(J>0)+-K*P!, holds true.

... back to the drawing board 8(
 
Back
Top Bottom