3rd Cumulative WW2 History Quiz

Status
Not open for further replies.
IronMan2055 & Cidknee

It's not a P-51 nor related to that aircraft or the manufacturer that designed the P-51. Not a Spitfire either.

But it is an Allied aircraft.
 
a bell xp 77
 
No it isn't Bell 77. The Bell had a flat radiator under the nose and the bubble canopy sat almost at the tailplane.
The tailplane is what has me stumped on this one.
The tail on this is a large vertical surface above plus a smaller one below and small circular vertical surfaces on the tailplane. It is very reminiscent of the Arado's from late in the war but since it is allied I am completely stumped.
Many aircraft of that era had a similar look but none that I can think of had such a unique tail.
Curtiss P-60, the P39 Airobonita and P-50 are all similar but not with that tail.
Can we research this one?
 
nope i'm pretty sure its not a hurricane from stated above the round part of the tail maybe a torpedo plane because of the line from the above ground view
 
IronMan2055

Not a Bell XP-77 or a Bell design.

jeriko one

Not a Hurricane or Hawker design.

Hornblower

Yeah, go ahead.
 
does it have skates instead of wheels it seems to be russian then
 
The 2nd picture is of the 3rd prototype, the others had a wheeled landing gear from what I can see. I believe this prototype got damaged during a take-off or landing incident. There were 8 prototypes built altogether, I believe. It did not go into production, one of the main reasons being the 2nd prototype killed this man:
 
Forgive me, but since noone was etting it, I took the chance to research it in my books.

It is a Berezniak-Isaev BI-1.
 
nonconformist said:
Forgive me, but since noone was etting it, I took the chance to research it in my books.

It is a Berezniak-Isaev BI-1.

The BI it is. If any are interested in further info on this aircraft, this is a pretty good online description. The author even found some old video footage of the BI and put it on the site. Part of his larger site on aviation, along with many other things, past and present and packed full of information. Much of not so readily available to those of us in the west.

The BI:

http://www.aeronautics.ru/nws001/bi/index.htm

Index:

http://www.aeronautics.ru/archive/vvs/history/index.htm

Home:

http://www.aeronautics.ru/index.htm

Your turn nonconformist. :)
 
it's german right with a fog thrower on it
 
i think that is one of the assaulted barrages that were used to soften up the beacheads in the pacific. I know something of that nature was used on Iwo Jima.
 
I don't remember the exact designation, but it looks like an Allied Landing Ship Tank (Rocket) LST(R) or Landing Ship Medium (Rocket) LSM(R). Both the Americans and British built their own versions of both and had several different types.
 
actually, the us built most of them, they gave alot of them to the UK under lend lease...russia too

but it could be anywhere, but it is a landing vessel. and it is being used to soften up a beachhead....probally
 
meisen said:
I don't remember the exact designation, but it looks like an Allied Landing Ship Tank (Rocket) LST(R) or Landing Ship Medium (Rocket) LSM(R). Both the Americans and British built their own versions of both and had several different types.

Yep! Though Jeriko had the general idea, Meisen had the designation, and specifics from it.

These huge ships would have their decks completely lines with rockets set at a particular angle. They would then be assigned a target, and would work out the range. Then, they would approach the target, until the area the rockets would land would line up with the target, and they'd then fire thousands of these bombs.
I believe they were used mostly, if not exclusively, in the invasion of France.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom