The So Called Truth About 9/11
THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
Last updated June 14 2003
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 1: Airforce stand-down
1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media
that fighter jets were scrambled to intercept the
hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as the
following research shows.
Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers,
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm
1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2
of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm
1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely,
Research & documentation by Illarion Bykov
and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm
1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11,
they just "arrived late"
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm
1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely,
12 Dec 2001
http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm
1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm
1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm
Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray
aircraft is a routine procedure.
Here's an example of how routine it is.
1.13 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov. Plane.
Netscape news. May 15 2003.
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_2-T&oldflok=FF-APO-11
10&idq=/ff/story/0001/20030515/001648315.htm&sc=1110&floc=NW_2-T
The procedures were already in place before
Sept 11 2001. It happened 67 times in the 10 months
between September 2000 and June 2001.
1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11.
Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another
9/11 Aug 14 2002
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual
air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top
So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets
scrambled, and why has a cover up story been
concocted?
In the unlikely event that the airforce failed
through incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! )
where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes
at race tracks.
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 2: Complicit behaviour of G.W.Bush
It has become common mythology in the media
that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary
School when he learned of the first WTC crash.
This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he
was, and what he knew?
2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel.
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his
movements that morning. See how many times
he has changed his story.
2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion
by Steve Grey.
http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1.
A strange press conference. By Jared israel
and Francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm
2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
White House Cover-up Creates More Problems
than it Solves by Jared Israel and Francisco
Gil-White [7 October 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm
2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar:
Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st
Plane Hitting WTC. Comments by Jared Israel
[Posted 12 September 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm
Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair.
Bush is lying about where he was, what he was
doing and what he knew, during the crucial
period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
-------------------------------------------------------
Why did the President - after being told "America
is under attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren
reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he
cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known
that at least one more hijacked plane was on the
loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason
at the top level.
2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 3: The Fictitious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there
no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists?
If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the
"innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the
hijackers?
3:1 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html
Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
3:2 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html
AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
3:3
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
3:4 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html
UAL 93 (Pennsylvania crash)
If they are alleged to have been using non-Arabic
aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board
using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ?),
why did the FBI claim that they were traced through
the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own
names?
If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before
boarding, as claimed in this article
3:5 http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html
why is there no airport security footage of them?
How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives,
guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being
searched, but avoiding security cameras and not
being on the passenger lists?
What aliases were they alleged to be using when
they were searched,and if they were not using
aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers
are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ?
3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm
3:9
http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/sti
ll_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html
3:10 http://www.corpust.com/CorpusTArchiveFBI70f19Alive.cfm
3.12 http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
3.13 http://truedemocracy.net/td4/24s-c-6men.html
3.14 http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/092001_news_trail.shtml
3.15
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen
23.xml
3.16 http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html
3.17 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/NEWSTF/stfch11.htm
3.18
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0109190363sep19.story?col
l=chi-news-hed
According to this article
3:11
http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:uEUylyDIXdYC:www.dallasnews.com/sharedc
ontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/121202dnint911gas.928b2377.html+FBI+Agent:
+Sept.+11+Hijackers+Probably+Used+Gas&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to
subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas
they would have been affected themselves - unless
they had masks. The story gets better all the time.
They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns,
knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite of
being searched, didn't show up on the airport security
cameras, and were not on the passenger lists.
They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars
outside the airport (last minute brushing up on the
way there, about how to fly the things!) and then
crashed the planes in breath taking displays of
skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who
they were, their passports were conveniently found
in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes
and occupants. So they got on board with false
IDs but used their real passports ?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the
planes and airport security systems failed due
to incompetence (not once but 19 times!), where
is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
into racehorse doping scandals.
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 4: More oddities
Why the official story concerning the hijacking
of AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.
4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer¹s Cut) American
Airlines Flight 11, Re-examined By David L. Graham
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/redux.html
Was an urban rescue team sent to New York
the night before the attacks?
4:2 http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm
4:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm
4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects
official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas
von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html
National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse
spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that nobody
had ever conceived of planes being used in this
manner, their statements in this article,
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;
Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News
May 16 2002
4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
when the 1994 extract from Time magazine,
quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates that the potential
problem had been recognized for decades.
And there are other examples of this possibility
having been widely recognized prior to Sept 11.
4:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001
http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm
In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any threat
had been overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas.
The statement she made is in this press briefing.
4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor
Dr. Condoleezza Rice. The James S. Brady Briefing
Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html
But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.
4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S. by
Bob Wooward and Dan Eggen. Washington Post
staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A3
5744-2002May17¬Found=true
What did happen to Flight 93? by Richard Wallace.
The Daily Mirror Sept 13, 2002
4:9 http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/mirror091302.html
4:10 http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm
4.11
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&
siteid=50143
Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type
allegedly made by passengers on Sept 11 possible?
4:12
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_1_030123.htm
l
4.13
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_2_030225.htm
l
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
Why is it that the US government doesn't feel
confident enough of it's case against Bin laden
to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding"
convenient video " confession" tapes ?
Probably because new video technology makes
it impossible to distinguish between a real video
confession and a fake.
When seeing and hearing isn't believing.
by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999
5:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm
Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins
Sydney Morning Herald. may 16 2002
5:2 http://smh.com.au/articles/2002/05/16/1021415016681.html
For more detailed evidence of a preplanned
agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,
Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
2:2 http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "Evidence please !")
It has become a common myth that Bin Laden
has admitted to the attacks. This simply isn't true.
Bin laden denies terror attacks and points
finger at Jews. Annanova news.
5:3
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_410936.html?menu=news.latestheadlines
Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks holy war.
ABC news online Sept 17 2001.
5:4 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2001/09/item20010917010639_1.htm
Bin Laden denies being behind attacks. JS ONline
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Sept 16 2001
5:5 http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/sep01/binladen-denial.asp
Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in USA
were committed by some American terrorist group.
Pravda Sept 12 2001
5:6 http://english.pravda.ru/accidents/2001/09/12/14910.html
Bin laden Denies US attack says paper. Middle East News
5:7 http://www.metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-37/reg/bin_laden_denies.htm
Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks CNN Sept 17 2001
5:8 http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/index.html
Bin Laden denies role in attacks. newsday.com Sept 17 2001
5:9 http://www.newsday.com/ny-wobin172369727sep17,0,7370581.story
Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in attacks.
Yahoo news Sept 13 2001.
5:10 http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/denies-reuters-taliban.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
Last updated June 14 2003
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 1: Airforce stand-down
1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media
that fighter jets were scrambled to intercept the
hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as the
following research shows.
Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers,
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm
1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2
of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm
1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely,
Research & documentation by Illarion Bykov
and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm
1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11,
they just "arrived late"
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm
1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely,
12 Dec 2001
http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm
1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm
1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm
Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray
aircraft is a routine procedure.
Here's an example of how routine it is.
1.13 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov. Plane.
Netscape news. May 15 2003.
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_2-T&oldflok=FF-APO-11
10&idq=/ff/story/0001/20030515/001648315.htm&sc=1110&floc=NW_2-T
The procedures were already in place before
Sept 11 2001. It happened 67 times in the 10 months
between September 2000 and June 2001.
1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11.
Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another
9/11 Aug 14 2002
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual
air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top
So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets
scrambled, and why has a cover up story been
concocted?
In the unlikely event that the airforce failed
through incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! )
where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes
at race tracks.
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 2: Complicit behaviour of G.W.Bush
It has become common mythology in the media
that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary
School when he learned of the first WTC crash.
This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he
was, and what he knew?
2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel.
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his
movements that morning. See how many times
he has changed his story.
2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion
by Steve Grey.
http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1.
A strange press conference. By Jared israel
and Francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm
2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
White House Cover-up Creates More Problems
than it Solves by Jared Israel and Francisco
Gil-White [7 October 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm
2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar:
Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st
Plane Hitting WTC. Comments by Jared Israel
[Posted 12 September 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm
Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair.
Bush is lying about where he was, what he was
doing and what he knew, during the crucial
period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
-------------------------------------------------------
Why did the President - after being told "America
is under attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren
reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he
cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known
that at least one more hijacked plane was on the
loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason
at the top level.
2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 3: The Fictitious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there
no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists?
If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the
"innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the
hijackers?
3:1 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html
Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
3:2 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html
AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
3:3
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
3:4 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html
UAL 93 (Pennsylvania crash)
If they are alleged to have been using non-Arabic
aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board
using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ?),
why did the FBI claim that they were traced through
the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own
names?
If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before
boarding, as claimed in this article
3:5 http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html
why is there no airport security footage of them?
How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives,
guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being
searched, but avoiding security cameras and not
being on the passenger lists?
What aliases were they alleged to be using when
they were searched,and if they were not using
aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers
are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ?
3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm
3:9
http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/sti
ll_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html
3:10 http://www.corpust.com/CorpusTArchiveFBI70f19Alive.cfm
3.12 http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
3.13 http://truedemocracy.net/td4/24s-c-6men.html
3.14 http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/092001_news_trail.shtml
3.15
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen
23.xml
3.16 http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html
3.17 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/NEWSTF/stfch11.htm
3.18
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0109190363sep19.story?col
l=chi-news-hed
According to this article
3:11
http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:uEUylyDIXdYC:www.dallasnews.com/sharedc
ontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/121202dnint911gas.928b2377.html+FBI+Agent:
+Sept.+11+Hijackers+Probably+Used+Gas&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to
subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas
they would have been affected themselves - unless
they had masks. The story gets better all the time.
They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns,
knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite of
being searched, didn't show up on the airport security
cameras, and were not on the passenger lists.
They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars
outside the airport (last minute brushing up on the
way there, about how to fly the things!) and then
crashed the planes in breath taking displays of
skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who
they were, their passports were conveniently found
in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes
and occupants. So they got on board with false
IDs but used their real passports ?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the
planes and airport security systems failed due
to incompetence (not once but 19 times!), where
is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
into racehorse doping scandals.
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 4: More oddities
Why the official story concerning the hijacking
of AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.
4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer¹s Cut) American
Airlines Flight 11, Re-examined By David L. Graham
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/redux.html
Was an urban rescue team sent to New York
the night before the attacks?
4:2 http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm
4:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm
4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects
official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas
von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html
National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse
spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that nobody
had ever conceived of planes being used in this
manner, their statements in this article,
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;
Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News
May 16 2002
4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
when the 1994 extract from Time magazine,
quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates that the potential
problem had been recognized for decades.
And there are other examples of this possibility
having been widely recognized prior to Sept 11.
4:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001
http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm
In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any threat
had been overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas.
The statement she made is in this press briefing.
4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor
Dr. Condoleezza Rice. The James S. Brady Briefing
Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html
But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.
4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S. by
Bob Wooward and Dan Eggen. Washington Post
staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A3
5744-2002May17¬Found=true
What did happen to Flight 93? by Richard Wallace.
The Daily Mirror Sept 13, 2002
4:9 http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/mirror091302.html
4:10 http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm
4.11
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&
siteid=50143
Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type
allegedly made by passengers on Sept 11 possible?
4:12
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_1_030123.htm
l
4.13
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_2_030225.htm
l
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
Why is it that the US government doesn't feel
confident enough of it's case against Bin laden
to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding"
convenient video " confession" tapes ?
Probably because new video technology makes
it impossible to distinguish between a real video
confession and a fake.
When seeing and hearing isn't believing.
by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999
5:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm
Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins
Sydney Morning Herald. may 16 2002
5:2 http://smh.com.au/articles/2002/05/16/1021415016681.html
For more detailed evidence of a preplanned
agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,
Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
2:2 http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "Evidence please !")
It has become a common myth that Bin Laden
has admitted to the attacks. This simply isn't true.
Bin laden denies terror attacks and points
finger at Jews. Annanova news.
5:3
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_410936.html?menu=news.latestheadlines
Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks holy war.
ABC news online Sept 17 2001.
5:4 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2001/09/item20010917010639_1.htm
Bin Laden denies being behind attacks. JS ONline
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Sept 16 2001
5:5 http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/sep01/binladen-denial.asp
Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in USA
were committed by some American terrorist group.
Pravda Sept 12 2001
5:6 http://english.pravda.ru/accidents/2001/09/12/14910.html
Bin laden Denies US attack says paper. Middle East News
5:7 http://www.metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-37/reg/bin_laden_denies.htm
Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks CNN Sept 17 2001
5:8 http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/index.html
Bin Laden denies role in attacks. newsday.com Sept 17 2001
5:9 http://www.newsday.com/ny-wobin172369727sep17,0,7370581.story
Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in attacks.
Yahoo news Sept 13 2001.
5:10 http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/denies-reuters-taliban.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
