A new twist in the Maher Arar case.

emzie

wicked witch of the North
Moderator
Joined
Jul 5, 2004
Messages
21,364
Location
Ottawa, Canada
Many of you know Maher Arar as the Canadian who was imprisoned by American police in New York and subsequently extradited to Syria where he was tortured. A year later, the Syrians released him as he was innocent.

Well it turns out the Americans wern't the ones who made the mistake.

reuters said:
OTTAWA, Sept 19 (Reuters) - Canadian police wrongly identified an Ottawa software engineer as an Islamic extremist, prompting U.S. agents to deport him to Syria, where he was tortured, an official inquiry concluded on Monday.

Maher Arar, who holds Canadian and Syrian nationality, was arrested in New York in September 2002 and accused of being an al-Qaeda member. In fact, said the judge who led the probe, all the signs point to the fact Arar was innocent.

Arar, 36, says he was repeatedly tortured in the year he spent in Damascus jails, and the inquiry agreed that he had been tortured. He was freed in 2003.

Judge Dennis O'Connor, who was asked by the Canadian government in 2004 to examine what had happened, found the Royal Canadian Mounted Police had wrongly told U.S. authorities that Arar was an Islamic extremist.

"The provision of this inaccurate information ... (was) totally unacceptable" and guaranteed the United States would treat Arar as a serious threat, O'Connor said.

"I am able to say categorically that there is no evidence to indicate that Mr Arar has committed any offense or that his activities constitute a threat to the security of Canada."

Civil rights advocates said the case of Arar and three other Canadians who ended up in Syrian jails raised suspicions that Canada might be outsourcing interrogation to nations where torture was commonplace.

O'Connor said the case of the other three men was troubling and warranted further investigation. But he found no evidence that the Canadian government had played any direct role in the U.S. decision to deport Arar to Syria.

Arar, calling on the government to hold accountable the officials he said were responsible for his ordeal, had tears in his eyes when asked by reporters for his reaction.

"Today Justice O'Connor has cleared my name and restored my reputation," said Arar, who has launched a lawsuit against Ottawa seeking compensation.

O'Connor's three-volume report castigated the Mounties for slipshod work in the wake of the 9/11 suicide attacks.

It said the Mounties exaggerated Arar's importance and later asked U.S. customs agents to put Arar and his wife on a special watch list, calling them "Islamic extremist individuals suspected of being linked to the Al Qaeda terrorist movement".

U.S. agencies declined to be questioned by O'Connor as to why they had deported Arar.

"I do conclude it is very likely that they relied on information received from the RCMP in making the decision to remove Mr Arar to Syria," the judge wrote.

Public Security Minister Stockwell Day, who has overall responsibility for the forces of law and order, said he was satisfied with the finding that Canadian officials had not played a direct role in the U.S. decision to deport Arar to Syria.

"What happened to Mr Arar is very regrettable. We hope ... never to see this happen again," he told reporters.

Arar first came to police attention in October 2001 when he was seen talking to another man already being investigated for possible al-Qaeda links.

O'Connor found that police made a number of serious mistakes in the Arar case.

The unit probing possible terror networks was poorly supervised and was comprised largely of financial fraud experts, who had little experience of national security cases.

Police gave all the files from their probe to the United States without screening the data for inaccuracies or following internal rules that limited what they could hand over.

"It was a breathtakingly incompetent investigation ... a disaster," said Marlys Edwardh, a lawyer for Arar.

O'Connor criticized unnamed Canadian officials, whom he said had leaked confidential and sometimes inaccurate information about Arar both before and after his release in a bid to demonstrate he really was a threat to national security.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N18316511.htm

However the Canadian government claims they never knew he would be deported to Syria.

NYTimes said:
The report’s criticisms and recommendations are aimed primarily at Canada’s own government and activities, rather than the United States government, which refused to cooperate in the inquiry.

But its conclusions about a case that had emerged as one of the most infamous examples of rendition — the transfer of terrorism suspects to other nations for interrogation — draw new attention to the Bush administration’s handling of detainees. And it comes as the White House and Congress are contesting legislation that would set standards for the treatment and interrogation of prisoners.

“The American authorities who handled Mr. Arar’s case treated Mr. Arar in a most regrettable fashion,” Justice O’Connor wrote in a three-volume report, not all of which was made public. “They removed him to Syria against his wishes and in the face of his statements that he would be tortured if sent there. Moreover, they dealt with Canadian officials involved with Mr. Arar’s case in a less than forthcoming manner.”

A spokesman for the United States Justice Department, Charles Miller, and a White House spokesman traveling with President Bush in New York said officials had not seen the report and could not comment.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/w...&ex=1159243200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print

So here, in light of this, I appolgise for blaimg the US and the US alone in this manner.
 
I never once suspected the Americans were at fault, at least not primarily.

The Mounties always get their man! They never of course, claimed they necessarily got the right man.
 
sysyphus said:
I never once suspected the Americans were at fault, at least not primarily.

The Mounties always get their man! They never of course, claimed they necessarily got the right man.

I'm not letting the Mounties off the hook by any means - people should go to prison for this "mistake"... But lets not forget that the anti-terrorist, trample on your rights hysteria came from (ie: shoved down our throats) our friends to the south.
 
I'm still trying to understand why a man with dual citizenship, Canada and Syria, was sent to the latter instead of neighboring Canada. RCMP fukc up or not, why was the man sent back to a country that condones torture?

Everybody is to blame. Poor guy.
 
I can't imagine anyone wanting to be in Winnipeg in january.

I think the Mounties still ride horses for parades and protocolary functions. Like when the Queen or her Governor General wastes our time and money with their little useless shows.
 
Urederra said:
Side question: Do the mounties still ride horses? I cannot imagine them riding a horse in Winnipeg on January.

When they do ceremonies they still wear the red coats, hats and ride horses.

Also while actually on duty I think you'll see mounted RCMP officers - crowd control or community policing type stuff.
 
Back
Top Bottom