Abominations of Nature!

Would you consider owning a cloned/transgenic pet?

  • yes

    Votes: 27 55.1%
  • no

    Votes: 22 44.9%

  • Total voters
    49

El_Machinae

Colour vision since 2018
Retired Moderator
Joined
Nov 24, 2005
Messages
48,283
Location
Pale Blue Dot youtube=wupToqz1e2g
They're obviously evil. Just look at the wicked glint.
I know most people know that animal cloning is 'par for the course' these days (and didn't exist a decade ago), but it's becoming common to the point where we can provide the service commercially, which will lead to all kinds of efficiences.

Anyway, these were spawned from a natural union, but the mother was a clone. I don't know what that makes these; other than 'cats'.

061214_cats_hmed_7p.hmedium.jpg


World's first cloned cat has 3 healthy kittens
Copy Cat became a mother the old-fashioned way, says scientist

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16213548/
 
cloning is bad.
not because of the act itself, but more due to the laziness of the cloners.
soon instead of breeding a proper gene pool, a clone will be repeated.
the path from there to an extinct species is very short.

it can help in the short term, but must never be allowed to be more than that - short term and very limited in useage
 
Sure, that is if I ever own a pet which is rather unlikely. Not much of an animal person here.
 
cloning is bad.
not because of the act itself, but more due to the laziness of the cloners.
soon instead of breeding a proper gene pool, a clone will be repeated.
the path from there to an extinct species is very short.

it can help in the short term, but must never be allowed to be more than that - short term and very limited in useage

I kind of agree. The cloning fad will be substituted soon by genetically enhanced methodologies. Cloning is just a step towards that. Why do you want to pass your bad genes if you can replace them by good ones? If we can make bigger, healthier and more disease resistant corn why wouldn't do the same with people?
 
Of course it going to be gradual, for once the technology is not quite ready yet. Besides, not everyone could afford it.

Intially, however eventually the technology would become cheaper and there would be diffusion driving the prices down.
 
Are they making progress on refreshing the aged DNA of the donor? I've always been told that clones have shorter life expectancies because they receive genes that have already been worn down a bit.
 
A cat is a cat.
 
There's enough real cats already, and they are easy enough to get, which makes this sort of stuff kina.. useless to me.

If they are able to produce a clone miniature elephant or something, then I'm interested.
 
The 'age' of the clone was pessimisticly observed for some years; we thought that the offspring would inherit the aging of the cell-donor. It turns out that it's not all that important, in the end (though it still is a little).

I don't want to white-wash the issue; it's still something that can be improved.

Clone telomeres behave normally
 
Back
Top Bottom