Ahmadinedjad's Aide: Jewish People Are Historically Accused of Corruption

Status
Not open for further replies.
blackheart said:
49% of the vote = 2/3s of the country? :confused: And please, stop spewing crap about the Democrat party and socialism, considering we're under a Republican president and a Republican Congress and the socialistic programs are still running strong.


Geographically, yes. It is what I meant and for good reason.


blackheart said:
Ever consider liberal press is an oxymoron that the most naive conservatives use to justify whenever something is published they don't like?

Oxymoron eh? How is liberal press an oxymoron? It might be redundant to say liberal before press, but this is less so nowadays.
 
I always like how certain conservatives claim that the media is "liberal." What they actually mean is that the media isn't solidly, strongly conservative. "You're either with us or against us" is the mind set of those conservatives who think the media is liberal.
 
Tulkas12 said:
Geographically, yes. It is what I meant and for good reason.

Explain? Because seeing a geographical voter map doesn't mean anything. So what Montana, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Iowa, etc. vote a certain way? They don't even have as much people combined as California and New York.


Tulkas12 said:
Oxymoron eh? How is liberal press an oxymoron? It might be redundant to say liberal before press, but this is less so nowadays.

A firm owned by a for profit corporation is going to be liberal how exactly?
 
YNCS said:
I always like how certain conservatives claim that the media is "liberal." What they actually mean is that the media isn't solidly, strongly conservative. "You're either with us or against us" is the mind set of those conservatives who think the media is liberal.

Polls indicate that members of the press are 80% liberal. This is not a conspiracy or a cop out, it is a fact. Fox news? Most of talk radio? Very conservative.
 
blackheart said:
Explain? Because seeing a geographical voter map doesn't mean anything. So what Montana, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Iowa, etc. vote a certain way? They don't even have as much people combined as California and New York.


Oxymoron eh? How is liberal press an oxymoron? It might be redundant to say liberal before press, but this is less so nowadays.

Electoral College was instated for a reason. . . can you geuss as to why?
 
Tulkas12 said:
Electoral College was instated for a reason. . . can you geuss as to why?

What's your point? If you want to claim 2/3s of the country geographically, then say geographically. It still doesn't mean anything, as neither candidate won any state with an overwhelming majority (70+%).
 
blackheart said:
What's your point? If you want to claim 2/3s of the country geographically, then say geographically. It still doesn't mean anything, as neither candidate won any state with an overwhelming majority (70+%).

lol name the last time that did happen?
 
Tulkas12 said:
lol name the last time that did happen?

George Washington? But that's not the point here. The point is you didn't specify geographically the first time around and it was deceiving.
 
blackheart said:
George Washington? But that's not the point here. The point is you didn't specify geographically the first time around and it was deceiving.

I apologize.
 
Moderator Action: Attention all. The following warnings will be handed out to the proper persons.

Commie #4522 for flaming. Be advised that your next warning will result in a ban.
Fox Mccloud for flaming.
usarmy18 for flaming. Careful what you post. You are fresh off a ban and you're well on your way to another one.
Bill3000 for trolling.
Tulkas12 for flaming. Another day has been added to your ban, six days overall.

People, there's a reason why I made that announcement at the top of the OT forum. Hopefully next time someone will report this rather than let it sink.

The trash about who's been brainwashed by who must cease or there will be swift bans. The only saving grace for this thread has come from those who are actually discussing the topic.

Edit: On second thought, this thread has strayed far off topic. Closed.

Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom