Amendment to rule 2.4 vote

Vote for amended rule 2.4


  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .

Whomp

Keep Calm and Carry On
Retired Moderator
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
18,200
Location
Chicago
Another amendment to vote on. Yes, no, abstain or whatever Daghie says. :D

For me, on the surface this seems fine since I don't think we would ever do this type of renaming anyhow. Then again, I'm not an attorney.
 
I'm for the amandement, since you never know what kind of people are in other teams, thus precision is needed here just to keep order and to avoid any nasty situations.

Tomasz
 
We have previously stated that we don't care too much about renaming as long as it is not used to make phony deals. The amendment works allright in preventing that and also allows the, by TNT, much wanted renaming practice in other cases. To put an end to this discussion we might just vote Yes because it will have no negative impact on our game as far as I can see.
 
Like tom said, we never know what kinda dummmmmmm de di dum dum deee we will encounter.
 
Seems alright as long as it's the "Description"-part that defines the rule. The "Verdict"- and "Definition"-parts are rather lacking, mentioning nothing about renaming workers to techs or gold, or renaming cities to other cities in order to trade a less important city, for example.

Edit: Although on a second thought I'm not sure if the worker would still be called Computers (Persia) so maybe that's not an issue. :)
 
OK the vote went 8 for "whatever Daghie thinks" and 4 for "yes".

Daghie will you act as our new UN rep? I think it's appropriate that you should since anyone who can comment about Kant in a public thread deserves to be our UN rep.
 
I know Daghie will do an excellent job, but it was rather sad to read your resignation Whomp. :( I don't suppose it's possible to have two UN reps, huh? Love ya both, man (men)!!! :cry:
 
Ah c'mon Gram..it ain't no thing but a chicken wing. I have big responsibilites spinning the "eaten doughnut scandal" in the POTKISS offices. :mischief:

I love you guys, (wo)man! :cry:
 
Awwww, we need a big
grouphug.gif
here.
 
Back
Top Bottom