Angry Dan Quayle?

From a biography of Dan Quayle

"Dan Quayle graduated from DePauw University in 1969 and received his J.D. from Indiana University School of Law at Indianapolis in 1974.

Dan Quayle's political career began when he was elected to the United States Congress in 1976 at age 29. He was elected to the United States Senate at age 33. On January 20, 1989 he took the oath of office as the 44th Vice President of the United States at age 41.

Dan Quayle joined the Cerberus Advisory Board in 2000, and currently serves as Chairman. Cerberus is one of the largest private investment funds in the United States,
with over $14 billion under management, and offices in NY, Chicago, LA, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and Germany. As Chairman, Dan Quayle has been actively involved in new
business sourcing and marketing for Cerberus in North America, Asia and Europe. His extensive global network of political and private-sector decision-makers, combined with
his investment expertise, have significantly contributed to the establishment of the Cerberus brand name."

Some of us may disagree with his political philosophy (yes, he has one) but he is certainly no idiot.

By the way, potato was spelled p-o-t-a-t-o-e long before it was spelled the Americanized version of p-o-t-a-t-o. There were many other American changes to word spellings such a flavour, colour, etc.

I would guess that Quayle has always been secretly amused by the public perception that he is unintelligent, particularly by those who will never accomplish 1/10th of what he has in his life.

Obviously, Firaxis has fed into this perception. Perhaps they should have considered Neville Chamberlain instead. He was the Prime Minister of Great Britain who decided it would be a great idea to appease Hitler by handing over Sudetenland, part of Czechoslavakia. Proclaiming "peace in our time" World War II began 11 months later.

There are far better historical examples of stupidy that could have been used instead of a young American Vice President who never really had any true world political or military power.
 
Can the names on the high score list be edited? I know who I'd prefer to have at the bottom.
 
Who Kolyana? Who?

As long as it ain't me.
 
Kolyana said:
Can the names on the high score list be edited? I know who I'd prefer to have at the bottom.

Lyndon Johnson.
ja.gif
 
irie-mon said:
yeah cause if you aren't doing anything wrong you've got nothing to worry about! :rolleyes:

until they misinterpret something you say. or decide that something you do is evil and a threat to our national security, then it's off to Guantanamo for you. ever heard of something called the "slippery slope"?


Slippery slope, dude we have been there a long time.....when/while fighting organized crime the government could and still does do it. However, since some people can use it to bash a person they don't like then hell lets make an issue of it eh?

About Gitmo, yea they are going to New York, Nashville, San Antonio, LA and snatching American citizens right off the streets...holy smokes where is Johnny Cochran. Dude, take the tinfoil off your head and quit looking for the black helicopters for they aren't comming.:lol:
 
The Condor said:
Who Kolyana? Who?

As long as it ain't me.


HA! To reveal that would be to stat a flame war, I am sure ;)

However, I *HAVE* found the XML in question, so I believe I can alter the highscore list accordingly!!!
 
Kolyana said:
HA! To reveal that would be to stat a flame war, I am sure ;)

However, I *HAVE* found the XML in question, so I believe I can alter the highscore list accordingly!!!


:D Woo! You know... an interesting idea might be to have everyone post their High Score list suggestions at some point.

Would be interesting to see how people rate the "Greatest Leaders in the History of the World".

And how do you choose? Greatest achievments during their lifetime? Founded an Empire that lasted X years?
 
Hey, could you PM me who and how (I would love to do it with my little sister:D)then?
 
henrycccc said:
Can;t dan quayle sue firaxis if he wanted to?

I'm guessing that you'd have him sue for defamation. He could sue. He couldn't win. His claim would be dismissed.

He would have to prove that Firaxis was saying false factual things. Firaxis never made a statement that could be proven true or false or put forth any facts. Firaxis just offered an opinion by putting him on the bottom of a leaderboard with historical leaders.

He would have to show that Firaxis said these false things in a malicious manner, since he is a public figure. The leaderboard is not malicious.

And if he wanted to get any money from them, he would have to show that he'd suffered monetary damages from Firaxis's malicious falsehoods. I doubt he's suffered any monetary losses.

So no, it would be pretty silly for him to try to sue Firaxis, and he would just be paying lawyers fees for nothing.
 
Well, Quayle isn't unintillegent, but intelligence and ability as a leader, which the Civilization IV score chart jestingly ranks, often do not coincide.

I imagine the chart isn't meant to be taken seriously. Besides, intelligent men know its better to let the public have some fun with them, it's often more fun for them too.
 
Quayle wouldn't stand a chance if he, indeed, WOULD like to sue. After all, what would be the offense? That he is listed last in a list of politicians? To successfully sue Firaxis, he'd have to PROVE that he is actually BETTER than any of those... a proof impossible to do.

It would be a different story if it wasn't Quayle, but Bush , and if the others on the list weren't rulers and politicians, but chimps and and rats... ah, scrap that, would be the same problem...
 
DanQualye cant be an insult because That would mean that Civ is insulting me, and it would never do that. :hmm:
 
TeutonicKnight said:
I don't understand, a lot of what he said that was used to proclaim him and idiot was either misquoted or completely fabricated.

I never was a Dan fan but he gets a lot of treatment such as Bush does. I found it ironic that all the talk of how "intelligent" John Kerry was compared to Bush until his transcrips got released and Bush had a higher GPA.


So true, :lol:

Leave it to the liberals to make themselves look about as smart as sea sponges. That is why the young go liberal and the older more expierenced tend to lean conservative.
 
Kolyana said:
It's the stuff you don't hear on the news that makes me a confirmed and proud democrat. I can't see how anyone would offer any words of support to the current government.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
I only have one thing to say, and that is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized; this shall be the law of the land unless chosen otherwise by two-thirds majority in both House and Senate followed by ratification by three-fourths of the states -- not by a mere Executive Order.

If it sounds familiar, it should. This is our Constitution.

If it isn't familiar, I weep for the future of our Republic.
 
Covert22 said:
So true, :lol:

Leave it to the liberals to make themselves look about as smart as sea sponges. That is why the young go liberal and the older more expierenced tend to lean conservative.



And leave it to the conservatives to oversimplify things...as always.

The young are liberal because they have an open mind- they have not lived in society as long as adults and thus are less spoiled by it. They are not as used to it. So, they can often better see it's faults.
The old are more conservative because change is not usually in their interests. They have figured out how to live in society as is, and any changes would just make their life harder in most cases.

Of course, there are other reasons.

As for Bush....
What I don't get is what the Bush supporters think the man has done for the country. He's sent the government into massive debt, increased the number of terrorists and terrorist attacks worldwide, made Iraq into a nightmare, filled our government with corruption, intruded on our civil liberties, and turned the world against us. What he's done isn't conservative. It isn't liberal. It's just stupid.
 
Back
Top Bottom