Archduke Charles .vs. Wellingtion

[ELITEOFWARMAN8]

Who are better? I say ADC .

 

[Dachs]

Better at what?

 

[History_Buff]

Last I checked, Charles has neither boots nor beef named after him. Point Wellington.

 

[Dachs]

He did write an awesome book about military theory that nobody after the middle of the nineteenth century has read.

 

[Lord Baal]

He did write an awesome book about military theory that nobody after the middle of the nineteenth century has read.

Whereas people still wear Wellington's shoes and eat his beef. Gotta stayrelevant, peeps.

 

[mayor]

Can someone enlighten me concerning Archduke Charles?

 

[Tycho Brahe]

Can someone enlighten me concerning Archduke Charles?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archduke_Charles,_Duke_of_Teschen

Archduke Charles, Duke of Teschen was an austrian general who fought Napoleon. I think hes the one in question?

 

[ELITEOFWARMAN8]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archduke_Charles,_Duke_of_Teschen

Archduke Charles, Duke of Teschen was an austrian general who fought Napoleon. I think hes the one in question?

Yup. That would be the lucky general.

 

[Dachs]

Yup. That would be the lucky general.

What was lucky about Karl's career?

 

[ELITEOFWARMAN8]

What was lucky about Karl's career?

He is better then the Duke .

 

[LightSpectra]

Please stop making threads. You're quickly becoming the mockery of this board.

 

[ELITEOFWARMAN8]

Please only post relevant posts here if you don't mind?

 

[LightSpectra]

I'm trying to be honest to you and spare you some embarrassment. Nobody thinks any of these threads are interesting, and if any actual good discussion emerges from them, it sprang from off-hand comments that came while deriding your posts.

Aside from that, it's not like any of these threads are relevant to anything. Just because Erherzog Karl and the Duke of Wellington are "historical figures" doesn't mean this is history. It has nothing to do with history. It's ravings. We have other subforums if you would like to make some alt-history scenarios, but judging by your posting style, you're likely to be just as badly received there.

 

[classical_hero]

This is an OT Tavern style thread.

 

[Ajidica]

This is an OT Tavern style thread.

That is an insult to the Tavern. Try the Chamber Pot instead.

 

[Phrossack]

I'm trying to be honest to you and spare you some embarrassment. Nobody thinks any of these threads are interesting, and if any actual good discussion emerges from them, it sprang from off-hand comments that came while deriding your posts.

Aside from that, it's not like any of these threads are relevant to anything. Just because Erherzog Karl and the Duke of Wellington are "historical figures" doesn't mean this is history. It has nothing to do with history. It's ravings. We have other subforums if you would like to make some alt-history scenarios, but judging by your posting style, you're likely to be just as badly received there.

...Thank you.

 

[ELITEOFWARMAN8]

I'm trying to be honest to you and spare you some embarrassment. Nobody thinks any of these threads are interesting, and if any actual good discussion emerges from them, it sprang from off-hand comments that came while deriding your posts.

Aside from that, it's not like any of these threads are relevant to anything. Just because Erherzog Karl and the Duke of Wellington are "historical figures" doesn't mean this is history. It has nothing to do with history. It's ravings. We have other subforums if you would like to make some alt-history scenarios, but judging by your posting style, you're likely to be just as badly received there.

Well this is your problem not mine.

 

[sophie]

I'm trying to be honest to you and spare you some embarrassment. Nobody thinks any of these threads are interesting, and if any actual good discussion emerges from them, it sprang from off-hand comments that came while deriding your posts.

Aside from that, it's not like any of these threads are relevant to anything. Just because Erherzog Karl and the Duke of Wellington are "historical figures" doesn't mean this is history. It has nothing to do with history. It's ravings. We have other subforums if you would like to make some alt-history scenarios, but judging by your posting style, you're likely to be just as badly received there.

Actually those trollish spin-off threads were pretty fun. It's a shame those got closed and these got left open though.

 

[LightSpectra]

Well this is your problem not mine.

Not really. The worst case scenario here for us is that we have to keep wasting milliseconds in skimming through the thread list, as a consequence of this forum being public. The worst case scenario for you is that your reputation as an annoying poster is solidified and people stop posting in your threads after this joke has been expended (with the possible exception of Domen necroes to talk about Poland).

Actually those trollish spin-off threads were pretty fun. It's a shame those got closed and these got left open though.

Hey, I actually made a clause about that

"if any actual good discussion emerges from [your posts], it sprang from off-hand comments [mostly trolling] that came while deriding your posts [aforementioned trolling]"

 

[Gen.Mannerheim]

Actually those trollish spin-off threads were pretty fun. It's a shame those got closed and these got left open though.

Thank you I worked had on finding two figures that people actually cared about, though I didn't even get a chance to comment on my own though