Been Playing Civ too Long

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well said. Every country has people with those attitudes, we have the same type of mindless nationalism here, its past its peak of the troubles, but it was the same thing really, any criticism of the IRA meant you must be a Brit sympathiser, which was ridiculous cause the IRA had minimal support anyway...

Its the whole "youre either with us or against us" attitude
 
Name one. And remember: it's only a crime if it's illegal. I'll accept "illegal in most Westernized countries" as illegal for the purposes of this. War in and of itself does not count, but provable breeches of the Geneva Convention that were sanctioned by government officials can count as well.


Guatanamo Bay

Pictures of Saddam's sons dead on T.V.
 
Al gore had nothing to do with the Internet. Well he had a little. The basics of the internet was developed in the 70's how they connected military Intelligence and such. Obviously it's more complex now. Al Gore did push legislation through which in turn helped support the creation of the internet. HOWEVER, Al Gore didn't say "Work I did in Washington pushed the creation of the internet" he said ""During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the internet." He pushed the legislation thru to expand the internet to the average person, but he DID not create it.

*cough cough cough cough* you must write your own materal...
SERIOUSLY, this has been said 1000s of times, I think your the only one to mention all of the supposive "draft" dodgers. They didn't you think they did, but you're just told what they want you to be told. their out to get you, can you smell it.. ITs BIGFOOT OMG... conspiracy theories are pathetic, don't spread them. thank you.

Nobody said the war was purely defense. And just because it's not defensive doesn't mean its not patriotic as matter of fact whether its offensive or defensive doesn't come into whether its patriotic or not..And the reason why we are to support the troops is because they are out their Risking their lives. and a lot are joining everyday. You can disagree with a war, but you can support the troops. The troops are not there to kill Iraqis. The IRAQ WAR IS OVER! HELLO! THERES NO OPPOSING ARMY! NEW GOVERNMENT SET UP. The only problem is, they have these guys sneaking over the border causing disorder, the united States troops are there to help keep order, to train the Iraqi Forces so they can keep order. And don't give me that Working class BS, good portion of the military now comes from Upper class homes. I'm related to alot of yuppies(aka Rich and gloat about it) and guess what, Half of them are enlisting. SO don't use the smoke screen of the rich man telling the poor man what to do BS It doesn't work in this case. Go support a socialist movement if thats how you feel. I'm not rich, I'm dirt poor. Do I do what the richman tells me? No i don't. If he ain't payin me, I ain't doing it. And this is not a war for oil. The united states has plenty of oil, but some pansys think some bacteria i na frozen tundra shouldn't be touched, and that newer and Safer nuclear power plants shouldn't be produced. Who really is benefiting from high oil prices? the guys that want to make it cheaper, or the guys that want to make it more expensive and difficult??

I snipped most of your extremely disjointed and long message; I wonder if it is the longest post ever made here. It is full of classics, but I've chosen only to respond to a few of them:

1. Al Gore never claimed to have invented the Internet, only to have voted for funding that led to its invention; that is a matter of record. So is the fact that rightwingers have most energetically spread the calumny that he claimed to have invented it - a canard you seem unable to abandon.

2. You don't want to talk about the fact that your heroes (Bush, Cheney et alia) are draft dodgers and compare talking about that to mentioning bigfoot. I interpret that as a sign of desperation.

3. You claim that the war in Iraq is over? What colour are the moons around the planet you live on?

I also noticed that in one of the many passages you snipped, you were annoyed because people, according to you, had called "90 % of Americans idiots", and in another passage you declared that the Elecetoral College was introduced by the Funding Fathers because most people are idiots. You are quite the logician, aren't you?
 
Öjevind Lång

1) Agreed.... in fact, using that word is absurd when talking about a clear fact. It is also absurd that this utter lie spread by people about him claiming to have invented it is still mouthed by people who demand that others pay attention their "truths".

2) Wow, unbelievable when again this is a clear and solid fact, proveable by all. No one has ever even tried to deny this as far as I have ever seen.

3) :lol: the best yet - war is over except more US soldiers have died since the war finished..... how often do you need to increase troops numbers by more than 20,000 when a war is already over? Nationalistic blindness is surely the only way that this administration is keeping its populace in check.


For the record, I have nothing bad to say against the American people - there are good and bad in everyone.... but this modern American government is breeding evil and resentment across the world and unfortunately America and its Allies will be paying a lot higher price than has yet been seen.... the main problem is that we ALL will... no matter who supported it.
 
And to the jackass that said something about the way I spell. OK, I fully admit that I cannot spell to great sometimes. I'm from West Virginia for God's sake! And that state has far from the best English teachers. But just because I cannot spell everything perfectly (let alone on an internet forum where the English language is butchered beyond recognition) doesn't mean that I am not intelligent, and likely more so than most of the people on here. And no I'm not bragging, just stating an observation.

I won't say anything about the high intelligence you claim to possess, but if you are an intelligence operative of any kind, with special and secret information, then I am aunt Mame. I also think you are slandering West Virginia because you won't take the responsibility for your crappy writing. "Butchering the English language", indeed. What about butchering logic?
 
Meatthing said:
As for my respect for the American Military, AS STATED, SOME OF US CAN'T ENLIST BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL/MEDICAL LIMITATIONS, no matter how ridiculous it is they still do not allow. Trust me, I went to enlist of a tiny little heart problem I wasn't allowed. So yes I would go get my ass blown off in Iraq if I could, along side my brothers. You're in full support of the troops yet you attack me for saying Give the Respect for doing their job and Not to spit on them. that makes alot of sense? Kinda like Hilary, supports the troops, Refuses funds for body armor. I believe there was a reason for this war, I don't believe it was for oil, I don't believe if was to look for what the media called WMDs, I believe it was to get actual WMDs(chemical and biological weapons which had been found) out of the hands of Saddam Hussien, to fix the mistake we made by putting him in, and to hope that by establishing a Democracy in the middle of chaos that it would help stabilize it. But do I know the actually reason? No. Do you? No. Regardless, if we pulled out now, all of our efforts in establishing a stable government will crumble, and all the lives lost will be in vain. If we can keep a stable government, then atleast they didn't die for nothing.
Damit man! Why?!
*sigh*...
I don't have the time nor energy to deal with your stupid quote wars. I know every single post I made, you "misinterpreted" (that's the nice way of putting it) and wrote three paragraphs on how I'm an ass. Well, I must simply state, I know it's hard to believe, but I think your an ass as well. But I must say a few things.
meat said:
I was trying to get the point across( and obviously didn't get it through your thick head) that the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Does Not say that Government can not interferer in your affairs.
What an idiot, did you even READ my post?! I said I was using the term "constitution" to represent the general foundations of this country (damit I'm moving to Europe).
Meat *sigh* said:
So if you say Respect troops dont spit on them your an ass? Come on. cOME ON. I support my troops, I respect my troops. U might not like the war, but don't dishonor the guys doing their job. Would you spit on a janitor? would you spit on a fireman? would you spit on another man? to spit on another man is one of the greatest insults, you'll get your ass kicked if you do it. Back in Vietnam they spit on the troops and showed the great disrepect, WHY? because they disagreed with the war. They treated troops like garbage, because they did their job. I don't want to see that happen now. I'm an ass because I don't want to treat the troops like Garbage! yay for me.
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't say anything like that. Don't put words in my mouth. WTH? I said that if you support the war NOW, your either fully brainwashed or just a ****** like yourself. I didn't say a word about troops there? Where were the troops there?
Meat said:
You said anyone supporting the war, supports the death of troops for no reason. Aka MURDERER! Also don't use the word "******" as when one uses it it shows a desperation and it's not very appropriate behavior, and VERY childish. Hundreds of thousand of Iraqis were killed by Saddam before America went in. I'm seriously doubting that America can kill hundreds of thousands with less than 10k dead on our side without using Nuclear bombs, or bombing woman and children. Only action was taken place against hostile enemy combatants, and if they dropped bombs on school buildings we'd know.
Wow, I didn't say anything about troops killing them (although they have), ever heard of terrorists? Do they still show that on Fox? During the violence HUndreds of thousands of innocent people have died, look up the stats. Don't say I called America murderers, you sound like an idiot. I am an American...
Don't respond to this post, your one of the thickest and dumbest people I've met on here. (and I've met a lot) I know your a redneck who probably watches FOX news, but comon, don't you remember what they teach you in Pre School? How to be umm...Smart?
TheLastOne36 said:
Shoot dutchking and i thought i was big on quote wars...
Not these kinds of quote wars...:D Kill me now...
Meat said:
Edit: Sorry for continuing the Argument, but it was to tempting. Now I'm hoping we can settle this, because I know your gonna have what I see as a whacked out view about this, and from your point of view I have the whacked out view. So Im hoping we can end it, and keep Political debate out of it. when people talk politics i cant shut up.
I don't hope we can settle this, because I know we won't. I know people like you, it's impossible to get anything through that disgusting skull of yours. Time for a reality Check...you really need one. Just because we've been arguing, please take that as a word of advice, not part of the fighting. If anything good is going to happen on this Earth we need people like you to open up.
That's all I have to say,
now I'm waiting for a mod to:
1. Close the thread.
2. Give me and meatcrap 11 infractions
3. Ban me and meatcrap
4. Move the thread to Politics
5. Ban everyone on the thread.
[EDIT]To be fair you can call me dutchcrap meatcrap. :D
i was pointing out how you called us all asses and then while you did it there was this glaring elementary grammar mistake. 3 TIMES! it was flippin' hilarious and made *you* look like an ass.

this was not a flame war until you started getting heavy with the personal attacks. you weren't stating your opinion about the topic you were working your aggression out on the rest of us, WTH man?

to any of the rest of the ppl still reading this thread from around the world. this is exactly the kind of people we have to deal with in this country, as soon as anyone wants to start dealing with the reality of this imperialistic war, we get this "DON'T YOU DARE SAY" this or that about our "brave" american troops. bill maher said that best. silence the matter with fear. i think we saw what our brave troops are capable of at abu ghraib. my point if meatwad chose to actually read what i said is that talking about the war has nothing to do with respecting or disrespecting the troops. but that as soon as we want to start discussing the war in real unimagined terms, the john wayne gung ho america lovers (read: irrational) throw up this thick smokescreen about how we are to speak b/c of how it affects the the troops. meatwad proved my point much better than i did myself. bush has clearly disrespected the troops and their families much more than i ever could. it starts with our public school system, all this crap about how great america is and how great its founding was blah blah blah etc etc. america was founded on genocide, we don't find that out until much later. but even then we never come to any sort of atonement, because again the america is great blah that gets so damned old. america could be great if we stepped out of this fantasy world. but that won't happen anytime soon, not until we get smacked around like europe did. we're only a few steps away from fascism, and it is guys like meatwad who are leading the way.
Well put, always can rely on you! :D He didn't read my posts either and twisted my words around, and won't give up on that calling myself a murderer thing.
 
Öjevind Lång;5875334 said:
I won't say anything about the high intelligence you claim to possess, but if you are an intelligence operative of any kind, with special and secret information, then I am aunt Mame. I also think you are slandering West Virginia because you won't take the responsibility for your crappy writing. "Butchering the English language", indeed. What about butchering logic?

ok auntie....
 
Al gore had nothing to do with the Internet. Well he had a little. The basics of the internet was developed in the 70's how they connected military Intelligence and such.

Actually, it has its basis in the mid-late 50's when the launch of SPUTNIK inspired the development of ARPANET to facilitate more rapid data sharing via packets. Prior to this, data was shared over the same kind of circuit as phones, allowing the flow of data between only two points at once. Packets allow multiple sources to simultaneously receive data from one source, which allows networks, beowulf clusters, etc.

Obviously it's more complex now.

Really only in terms of breadth of implementation and speed of data transfer (bandwidth); however, the same method of data transfer (packets) as ARPANET used in the 50s is still in use today.

Al Gore did push legislation through which in turn helped support the creation of the internet. HOWEVER, Al Gore didn't say "Work I did in Washington pushed the creation of the internet" he said ""During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the internet."

Link? I've never seen a quote of his where he claimed he built, created, invented, or otherwise is responsible for the advent of the Internet, only that he was instrumental in facilitating its widespread implementation, which is true.
 
i was pointing out how you called us all asses and then while you did it there was this glaring elementary grammar mistake. 3 TIMES! it was flippin' hilarious and made *you* look like an ass.

this was not a flame war until you started getting heavy with the personal attacks. you weren't stating your opinion about the topic you were working your aggression out on the rest of us, WTH man?

to any of the rest of the ppl still reading this thread from around the world. this is exactly the kind of people we have to deal with in this country, as soon as anyone wants to start dealing with the reality of this imperialistic war, we get this "DON'T YOU DARE SAY" this or that about our "brave" american troops. bill maher said that best. silence the matter with fear. i think we saw what our brave troops are capable of at abu ghraib. my point if meatwad chose to actually read what i said is that talking about the war has nothing to do with respecting or disrespecting the troops. but that as soon as we want to start discussing the war in real unimagined terms, the john wayne gung ho america lovers (read: irrational) throw up this thick smokescreen about how we are to speak b/c of how it affects the the troops. meatwad proved my point much better than i did myself. bush has clearly disrespected the troops and their families much more than i ever could. it starts with our public school system, all this crap about how great america is and how great its founding was blah blah blah etc etc. america was founded on genocide, we don't find that out until much later. but even then we never come to any sort of atonement, because again the america is great blah that gets so damned old. america could be great if we stepped out of this fantasy world. but that won't happen anytime soon, not until we get smacked around like europe did. we're only a few steps away from fascism, and it is guys like meatwad who are leading the way.

My point about respecting the troops was that you kept saying it's a smoke screen to support the troops. I say it is not a smoke screen. I say RESPECT THE TROOPS AS YOU WOULD ANY OTHER MAN OR WOMAN, Don't spit on them for doing their job. My grand father stormed the beaches of Normandy back in WWII, my Uncle's Father was a Nazi soldier. My Uncle's father and my Grandfather treated each other with respect, regardless that there was a possibility that they were exchanging fire. My other Uncle was spit on by hippies because he was a soldier in Vietnam. Spit on for doing his job. Thats disrespect. I don't want to see people disrespecting the troops because they did their job. Common indecency is all I ask for. You can say I don't like this war, it's in ethical, it needs to end, blah blah blah, what ever you want you can do or say I don't care, just don't disrespect people for doing their jobs. And I've read some of the post from you guys saying Iraqi babies were killed by the troops, this isn't true. Now our troops are people too, they have faults. Like the ones involved in the prison scandals and such, They weren't doing that as part of their job, I don't know why they would do that it is wrong and they should be spit on, but the ones just doing their job not intentionally harming innocent people should not be insulted. How would you like it if every day you went to work, thinking you made a difference in the world, and you get spit on? And don't give me the B.S. on public schools, I know they brain wash, but guess what, your getting education for free, ofcourse the people providing it are going to push the whole "yeah we're great aren't we" propaganda. I disagree with it, but I also disagree with the political correct lies we get when we are older and they do talk about the darker times. The only way to have a proper view is to research it yourself.

You obviously never lived in a facist state if you believe america is only a few steps from it. Some of my closest friends grew up in Police states, some grew up under Saddam's control, and guess what, Everyday they feared for their lives, one of my friends lost his mother because someone said she didn't like Saddam.




Öjevind Lång;5875310 said:
I snipped most of your extremely disjointed and long message; I wonder if it is the longest post ever made here. It is full of classics, but I've chosen only to respond to a few of them:

1. Al Gore never claimed to have invented the Internet, only to have voted for funding that led to its invention; that is a matter of record. So is the fact that rightwingers have most energetically spread the calumny that he claimed to have invented it - a canard you seem unable to abandon.

2. You don't want to talk about the fact that your heroes (Bush, Cheney et alia) are draft dodgers and compare talking about that to mentioning bigfoot. I interpret that as a sign of desperation.

3. You claim that the war in Iraq is over? What colour are the moons around the planet you live on?

I also noticed that in one of the many passages you snipped, you were annoyed because people, according to you, had called "90 % of Americans idiots", and in another passage you declared that the Elecetoral College was introduced by the Funding Fathers because most people are idiots. You are quite the logician, aren't you?

Could be the longest, but then again coulda just been the quotes i posted makin it seem long lol.

I already gave you the quote, but heres a link http://usgovinfo.about.com/blgorenet.htm with some information, It's not the original one i found with the information, cause i couldn't remember what I typed in CNN news search for it. If you look up Al Gore controversies in Wikipedia it should have a fairly accurate description of it. Al Gore didn't invent the internet, its basis was created in the late 60's. during his tiem in Congress he helped promote it and push it more towards commercial use. But he didn't say I had a hand in pushing commercial use of the Internet, He said he had taken the initiative in creating the internet.

It's not a sign of desperation when people use conspiracy theories to combat other conspiracy theories. You can't prove they did, and you can't prove they didn't. I don't believe they dodge the draft I mean it is possible that their fathers pulled strings and got them safer positions, but if you were a father had the means would you not make sure your kid was safe? I never said they were my Heroes. I mean Captain Planet FTW!


Actually, it has its basis in the mid-late 50's when the launch of SPUTNIK inspired the development of ARPANET to facilitate more rapid data sharing via packets. Prior to this, data was shared over the same kind of circuit as phones, allowing the flow of data between only two points at once. Packets allow multiple sources to simultaneously receive data from one source, which allows networks, beowulf clusters, etc.



Really only in terms of breadth of implementation and speed of data transfer (bandwidth); however, the same method of data transfer (packets) as ARPANET used in the 50s is still in use today.



Link? I've never seen a quote of his where he claimed he built, created, invented, or otherwise is responsible for the advent of the Internet, only that he was instrumental in facilitating its widespread implementation, which is true.

They started in the 60's, then 69 they launched it. As stated above Al Gore said "I took the initiative in creating the internet" I know he did have a hand in spreading it to commercial use, and shaping it to what it is, but he didn't say that, he said he created it, And that is what everyone clings on to. Yes Al Gore had a huge hand in helping the internet, but he didn't create it. If he would of said I had a hand in spreading the internet, or shaping or something along those lines, there would of been no controversy.


Damit man! Why?!
*sigh*...
I don't have the time nor energy to deal with your stupid quote wars. I know every single post I made, you "misinterpreted" (that's the nice way of putting it) and wrote three paragraphs on how I'm an ass. Well, I must simply state, I know it's hard to believe, but I think your an ass as well. But I must say a few things.
then why are you participating if you dont have time nor energy. You misinterpreted my post much more than I misinterpreted your post. By the simple fact that you thought I called only you an ass, and then you call me an ass and claim it hard to believe. I already said I'm an ass, like 10x more than i said anyone else is an ass.

What an idiot, did you even READ my post?! I said I was using the term "constitution" to represent the general foundations of this country (damit I'm moving to Europe).
No your original post said that the constitution SAID that the government can not interfere My reply said that It DOESNT say that. Then you said that it was a representation followed by personal attacks(which I like how I read personal attacks from others, but I'm the only one that takes heat for it) in which I said that It still doesn't say it in the Constitution. It doesn't. That was my point, but if you want to claim it does go ahead and lie. I understand that you were using it as a symbol, but don't say something is written in the constitution when it is not. Say, Our constitution is a testament to Freedom it is our protection from the trespasses of Government, don't say The constitution says "The Government is not allowed to wire tap my phones" And if your willing to move to Europe because someone who read the constitution 50 million times has said it doesnt say the government can't interfere then why go to Europe, it's more stricter there buddy. I mean CCTV.

What the hell are you talking about? I didn't say anything like that. Don't put words in my mouth. WTH? I said that if you support the war NOW, your either fully brainwashed or just a ****** like yourself. I didn't say a word about troops there? Where were the troops there?

Wow, I didn't say anything about troops killing them (although they have), ever heard of terrorists? Do they still show that on Fox? During the violence HUndreds of thousands of innocent people have died, look up the stats. Don't say I called America murderers, you sound like an idiot. I am an American...
Don't respond to this post, your one of the thickest and dumbest people I've met on here. (and I've met a lot) I know your a redneck who probably watches FOX news, but comon, don't you remember what they teach you in Pre School? How to be umm...Smart?

Originally Posted by dutchking
I'm criticising the Government that has our men and women in Uniform killed for no purpose. If you support the government right now I think it's safe to say that you could possibly be supporting the killing of those troops for no reason.
Apparently this post has been deleted. but if you look at my post in page 8 u can see the link to it, when clicked on says it's not found. So. maybe you're cleaning up your tracks. You called them Murderers. You called people murderers, then you attacked me for saying Give them Respect. And You persist on using the word ******, Listen, while I looked back on your post, i found your other post about you only being 13, but believing your smart. Your not. You're a little child with an agenda, you lack the ability to give people common respect, you call them ******** without understanding what Retardation is. So go cry to your mom, and wait for your balls to drop. You are more of an Ass than me if you attack the mentally impaired.


I don't hope we can settle this, because I know we won't. I know people like you, it's impossible to get anything through that disgusting skull of yours. Time for a reality Check...you really need one. Just because we've been arguing, please take that as a word of advice, not part of the fighting. If anything good is going to happen on this Earth we need people like you to open up.
People like me to open up? So the guys that go the extra mile every day to help out their friends, family, and neighbors, their communities as well, need to learn how to open up. Listen junior. You're still young, why don't you try this, stop with the offensive behavior towards the mentally ill, open a history book, read a newspaper. Maybe you'll pick up that just cause it's popular doesn't make it right. You're like a record player(It's like an ipod, but it's older and it wasn't portable and it had GIGANTIC disc that look like black CD's in case your young mind wasn't aware.) you keep going round and round, same attacks each time. I'm willing to bet you got the thesaurus open too.


That's all I have to say,
now I'm waiting for a mod to:
1. Close the thread.
2. Give me and meatcrap 11 infractions
3. Ban me and meatcrap
4. Move the thread to Politics
5. Ban everyone on the thread.
[EDIT]To be fair you can call me dutchcrap meatcrap. :D

Well put, always can rely on you! :D He didn't read my posts either and twisted my words around, and won't give up on that calling myself a murderer thing.
wow.. childish. If you're going to at least debate with the adults, make it sound like it.
 
Didn't the french politicians run all over the people like 2 years ago? and there was a riot something about french not being good workers so the government made it easy to fire them? I could careless, you people didn't give us french toast or french fries, your FRAUDS!!! lol jpjp.. well you didn't :)

Every government run over the people these days but the french seem to be the best at showing their discontent. Go check up when they go on strike...Once they blockaded every road in and out of Paris with trucks. Civilian disobedience ftw, when politicians radically fail to represent the voice of the people it's our turn to act. Anyways, Im not french - I thought "French fries" was an american/english invented word. We call them "Pommes Frites" in Sweden, ironically that IS french :crazyeye:

"Europe has a long history of killing it's self". Duh, Civil War. General Custer.

Anyways, congratulations on the longest post I have ever seen on the internets. Other than that, you should try watch some medias that doesn't rhyme with the US national anthem. The sources of your facts are biased to the extremes. I'm not anti-american, I just believe in a better world without a self-entitled world Police. The Romans failed a few centuries ago and everyone following them did the same.
 
You obviously never lived in a facist state if you believe america is only a few steps from it. Some of my closest friends grew up in Police states, some grew up under Saddam's control, and guess what, Everyday they feared for their lives, one of my friends lost his mother because someone said she didn't like Saddam.

Where I live we got alot of arabs, most disagree with the methods of how he was "extracted". Most did not by any means fear for their lives, only politically active people really had to. It's a bad thing, I don't defend the regime, but current state Iraq is way worse than during Saddam. I met a guy this week who emigrated justa few months ago, he really did not want to leave but it had gotten completely out of control.
 
My point about respecting the troops was that you kept saying it's a smoke screen to support the troops. I say it is not a smoke screen. I say RESPECT THE TROOPS AS YOU WOULD ANY OTHER MAN OR WOMAN, Don't spit on them for doing their job. My grand father stormed the beaches of Normandy back in WWII, my Uncle's Father was a Nazi soldier. My Uncle's father and my Grandfather treated each other with respect, regardless that there was a possibility that they were exchanging fire...

It was not my intent to convey that i thought the US troops were intentionally killing babies. I think in fairly obvious terms my argument was pointed towards those who started this war in the US, Bush et al. you gave me a knee jerk reaction.

Innocent civilians have always been victims in war, starting probably with the first war ever fought, and now with airplanes and big bombs this is even more true.

The thing is, this is not news to anyone, and so anyone who starts a war needs to weigh this into his decision making process. By starting this conflict Bush is tacitly making the claim that the innocents who will inevitably die in this war are paying a price that in the bigger picture of things is worth paying given what he is trying to accomplish. The basis of this war, not the real basis, but the basis of this war in terms of how he sold it to the public, was grounded in fabricated lies. the decision was made to go to war for imperialist reasons and they then manufactured a case of pre-emptive self-defense to sell it to the public. so by extension, he made the decision that it would be okay for our troops to go into iraq and to kill among others innocent civilians many of whom are young babies. that's the question i was asking, how is it patriotic or if you wish respectful of our troops to send them into this conflict and to put them in a position where they will how ever inadvertently kill young children? to me that's not very respectful, because to me this war is clearly not for self-defense, never was, this war is for oil profits and for corporations who are in the war business, the military industrial complex if you like.

in their distorted vision of reality, they think that the strengthening of these corporations and stock values is akin to US nat'l security. i am arguing it is not the same, that their interests are driven by greed and blood-lust, and they sell it to us as if it is a national security concern. then there were others who posted making the valid claim that the history of man is all about imperialism, so accept it. then my point was that it shouldn't be acceptable to use history to justify crimes in the present. the US is over-stepping itself in this conflict because this war will inevitably have long term ramifications and i don't think those ramifications bode well for US nat'l security.

let me ask you this, why do you lash out at me so when what i am asking for is that we as a nation come to grips with our violent ways and seek more peaceful means of resolving our disputes? i don;'t get it, how is that something that should earn the ire of someone who as you say is so helpful to his fellow man? are you saying that other people do not deserve to live under the same level of security that you do? you are equating me to the liberals of the '60's who you clearly despise, but i never said i was a liberal nor did i equate my politics with the liberal agenda. how is the desire for peace liberal and despicable? you need to answer that within yourself. yes liberals of the '60's wanted peace, but supposedly christians are taught ideals of peace as well, so with the same information that you assumed i was liberal with, you could also have assumed i was christian. i am saying both would be faulty logical conclusions because you don't have enough information to conclude in either case. peace is not liberal. peace is the state that exists between men that allows civilization to flourish. fighting wars of imperialism in the hoodwinked guise of self-defense and national liberation is not the road to peace.
 
Those of you trying to seperate the American people and the government forget that Bush was re-elected by the American people after the war had been going on for some time. I lived in San Francisco for 20 yrs and heard all the arguments the Bush is the Devil people are making here. Now I live in rural Oregon and see overwhelmingly signs saying, 'support our troops', 'God bless America' and 'support the war'.

As for how wonderful the French are and how everybody likes them - may I ask where the French and the Germans were when the people in the Balkans were slaughtering each other in the 90's. They sat cowardly and did nothing about this terrible situation in their own continent, not thousands of miles away. As for how the Iraqi's are better off. Well, a couple of years ago Bush received a group of Arab men whose hands had been cut off by Saddam because of 'crimes against the state'. Would those of you criticising US actions in Iraq like to face those men and tell them they would be better off if still slaves of Saddam.

As for losing our freedoms, rubbish. The fact that you can post what you are on this forum disproves this. Saddam, on the other hand, used to cut off the tongues of those who he thought had spoken ill of him.

Listen up France: the majority of us in the US who re-elected George Bush DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU THINK OR WHETHER YOU LIKE US AND YOU HAVE NOT THE COURAGE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. That is why you have become a third rate, silly little power. But there are signs of a change. Did not a right winger just get elected President of France by a large margin. Perhaps you whiners are not the majority even in your own country.

This thread has many vile attacks on America and Bush so I make no apology to responding seriously.
 
Innocent civilians have always been victims in war, starting probably with the first war ever fought, and now with airplanes and big bombs this is even more true.

Actually, the majority of civilians in Iraq have been killed by insurgents. Bombs are so acurate that we can put one through a specific window from an F-16 20,000 feet in the air. Just thought I'd point that out.
 
thank you valadon

And yes a supporter of George W. Bush was just elected by a large majority in France. Even though we constantly hear the world hates George Bush, for some reason the world elects people that like George Bush.

I'm done with this topic. About my facts being biased and my media being too american. Well, All facts are biased depending on who's giving them to you. But my News media is a mix of CNN,Fox, and BBC. so 1/3 ain't American, although our national Anthem has the same rhythm :) :)


They should add news corporations to Civ, make it so that it's like propagada. it pushes your culture into the city its in every turn, it be great for your border towns, and then set up camp in other nations like Corporations :)
Then you can spend money on propagada, and if its spread to another nation you get -1, relations.
 
Ok, this time I'm definately not responding completely, because your just a waste of my time that I don't have. I didn't even read your post because I know it was so stupid. One thing:
MEAT said:
No your original post said that the constitution SAID that the government can not interfere My reply said that It DOESNT say that.
For the last time, how many times do I have to say this:
In my first post, I said 3 . .. .. .. .ing times already, I was using the term constitution to represent the foundations of which this country was founded upon. I didn't mean that the founding fathers wrote:
The government is supposed to stay out of people's buisness!
I meant that it was an IDEA that this country was founded upon, and I used the constitution to represent what this country is about (AKA IDEAS).
Nice to meet you...I'm not returning to this thread, no matter how hard to resist. :rolleyes:
BTW, people like you are thicker than the tree in my backyard, and obviously theres no way to get through to you, so nobody try to get through to him. He obviously doesn't care about the truth, and is a redneck still sour about the Civil War ("Confederate States mod"), so we mind as well not even try, if you change your mind meatwad, PM me and we'll talk. ;)

[EDIT] One last thing. :D
And yes a supporter of George W. Bush was just elected by a large majority in France. Even though we constantly hear the world hates George Bush, for some reason the world elects people that like George Bush.
He didn't even win the first . .. .. .. .ing election. Discuss, guys, I'm not coming back.
 
Ok, this time I'm definately not responding completely, because your just a waste of my time that I don't have. I didn't even read your post because I know it was so stupid. One thing:

For the last time, how many times do I have to say this:
In my first post, I said 3 . .. .. .. .ing times already, I was using the term constitution to represent the foundations of which this country was founded upon. I didn't mean that the founding fathers wrote:
The government is supposed to stay out of people's buisness!
I meant that it was an IDEA that this country was founded upon, and I used the constitution to represent what this country is about (AKA IDEAS).
Nice to meet you...I'm not returning to this thread, no matter how hard to resist. :rolleyes:
But your post did say it said that, It didn't say that it was symbolic or stood for it It said that. It's like going into a diner reading the menu and saying yes it says here I can have a shake for free with a burger, and the waitress says no it doesn't you can have a shake with your burger for a reduced price but not for free. and then telling her "No its the principle of the matter, It's symbolic, it means I want a shake, and a burger, and i want it for free. regardless of what it says in the menu" Doesn't make sense, at all. I mean COME ON, you can't say it's there when it's not then later say it's a symbol, You have to say it's a symbol before hand. If you said the Constitution symbolises our freedom then it be fine, no argument, but to say it says in there, as if no one has ever read it, something that isn't in there is just pathetic.

BTW, people like you are thicker than the tree in my backyard, and obviously theres no way to get through to you, so nobody try to get through to him. He obviously doesn't care about the truth, and is a redneck still sour about the Civil War ("Confederate States mod"), so we mind as well not even try, if you change your mind meatwad, PM me and we'll talk. ;)


Don't care about truth, I'm a redneck, still sour about the Civil War because I updated a mod. First off, If I didn't care about the truth, I would of used the text book you use in school and believed them to the fullest extent. Instead i goto a library check out history books and Learn, what they don't teach you in your little 6th grade class. As a matter of fact in my years in highs chool my teacher allowed me to teach some of his classes because I had more knowledge stored in my mind on The Civil War, the American Revolution, and the Roman Empire, than he had using a book. Unfortunately I stopped learning about the Civil War, and American Revolution and Rome, because I thought I knew it all, and then I started forgetting. I'm better on the civil war than the other two because I constantly debate with people over what it was truly about. So, the truth does matter to me. But not a conspiracy theory truth presented by the left wing, nor one from the right wing. I do the research and discover on my own on stuff I really want to know about. Now the Redneck part? I am far from a "redneck"(which by the standard yuppies description would be poor, married to cousin, missing teeth and no education) Yeah I consider you a yuppie because you have the yuppie upbringing in all your posts. I am poor, I don't marry my cousins, I have all my teeth(Never had a cavity in all my life buddy) and I have been educated in the public school systems but my elementary, middle school, and high school are ranked in the top 10 in the state, and top 50 in the country, or at least they were when I attended. Now the actual definition of Redneck would be a farmer, whos neck is sunburned red. This would be true for a couple weeks in the summer when I helped my Grandparents on their farm. Yes, as I said I like to help people out as much as possible. Why? I'm an ass. But I'm a nice ass. Now about the War for Southern Independence(civil war is the common, but wrong term for this war). Boy, you DO NOT want to enter on that playing field. I might be a little rusty on names and dates, but I know what really happened, I know why it happened, I know the atrocities committed by Union forces that your 13 year old mind couldn't fathom. Now you run along and enjoy that tree in your backyard, and I hope you think about the people who are less fortunate, who don't have a mommy and daddy protecting them from the world like you do. I do what I can to help my community, and I'm flat broke. maybe your mommy and daddy should cut your tree down and donate the fire wood to people who need to stay warm this winter. I'm sure if your mommy and daddy weren't protecting you from the world then you'd have a totally different view on the matter.



[EDIT] One last thing. :D

He didn't even win the first . .. .. .. .ing election. Discuss, guys, I'm not coming back.

. .. .. .. . ? balls don't drop when you have periods. He won. See they ahve this thing called an Electoral College. When you vote you vote for the Electoral College. See your state has districts, these districts vote. If district 1 votes for A and district 2 votes for B then District 3 votes for A. then A wins that state. During the 2000 election, Bush and Gore were tied. It really came down to Florida, it relied on I believe one district. The district voted, and Bush won. they disputed it, wanted a recount, recounts take week possibly months, So the Supreme Court(which was slightly liberal) decided to leave the vote results as is. George Bush won. Then the 2004 Election, George Bush won again, this time No dispute. So lets see a President gets in, and is popular enough to win again, even though having an unpopular war and left wing attacks constantly in the media. I'm pretty sure, even with a recount, Gore lost.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom