• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days (this includes any time you see the message "account suspended"). For more updates please see here.

Blockbuster to go bankrupt?

MarineCorps

Explosion!
Joined
Jun 26, 2003
Messages
8,187
Location
Cape Cod
Despite reporting a narrowing loss on its operations, video rental giant Blockbuster(NYSE: BBI) is slowly unraveling as it faces increasing pressure from creditors, competition, and the loss of revenue streams. The company has begun hinting that it might even need bankruptcy protection. While Foolish contributor Rick Munarriz holds out hope that the leading movie-rental chain will be able to reclaim its star power, it looks to me like the company is really just getting dressed for its own funeral.

Blockbuster posted a loss of $491 million, or $2.61 per share, as revenues fell 2% to $1.39 billion, a shade below analyst expectations of $1.41 billion. While rental revenues were actually up 11% for the quarter, reflecting the price increase the company instituted earlier this year, the company was socked by the loss of $117 million in late fees that it gave up to entice customers to keep coming back. Yet even that did not work; same-store sales fell nearly 4% from last year. Perhaps that's because customers were confused about whether they actually had to pay late fees or not.
Story continues below ↓ advertisement

Last year, the company launched an ill-fated promotion that seemed to do away with late fees, but really didn't. That led the company to abandon the surcharge altogether -- but among the company's 1,800 franchised stores, only 475 agreed to participate in the no-late fee program. Customers enjoying an extended movie viewing might be surprised to find they have to pay a late fee after all.

The movie maven's competition is also getting more fierce, and not just from online rental king Netflix(Nasdaq: NFLX), a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection that continues to reel in sales and members. Blockbuster faces challenges from personal video recorders from Stock Advisor pick TiVo(Nasdaq: TIVO), video-on-demand from cable operators, and even McDonald's(NYSE: MCD), which is offering DVD rentals from kiosks located in their restaurants for just $0.99 each. Customers can also purchase low-cost movies through mass marketers like Wal-Mart(NYSE: WMT), Best Buy(NYSE: BBY), or Circuit City(NYSE: CC).

The rental industry has also been suffering from a double-digit decline caused by a lack of, um, blockbuster movies. According to the entertainment industry research firm Rentrak, domestic in-store and online home video rentals fell 11.7% for the quarter. That's nearly four times greater than the 3% slump experienced from 2000 to 2004.

Even worse, Blockbuster is saddled with excessive amounts of debt, which limits its ability to change reels swiftly. Lenders and creditors eyeballing its $1.3 billion of debt are demanding stricter terms as they become increasingly concerned about the company's ability to finance its obligations. To lower its debt and help stave off bankruptcy, Blockbuster entered into a $150 million preferred stock offering. That's essential, since the credit agreement amendment it received provides debt relief through 2007, but only if the company gets at least $100 million from the stock offering.

These are not the maneuvers of a thriving company, or even one adjusting to a changing economic climate. Mismanaged programs, stalled membership levels, bleeding revenues, and hat-in-hand begging for credit terms are symptoms of a floundering enterprise. Blockbuster is not getting ready to shake, rattle, and roll. Instead, it's simply caught up in a death rattle.

A nearly $500 million loss, thats quite a bit.
 
I consider buying a stupidity...its not like you are going to see the movie again...lol, well, thats my opinion.:p
 
AnsarKing101 said:
I consider buying a stupidity...its not like you are going to see the movie again...lol, well, thats my opinion.:p
I still watch movies I have on DVD....if you watch it more than two or three times then it's probably more worthwhile in the long run to buy it rather than rent.

To each his own.
 
renting is smart though... i bought the path of neo and beat it in two days. waste of money! if only i rented first...
 
CoolioVonHoolio said:
renting is smart though... i bought the path of neo and beat it in two days. waste of money! if only i rented first...
That's for games, we're talking about movies. (Well at least that's what I'm talking about....) If it's a game like that (Read a review on the internet to see how long it takes to beat) and isn't that great, then renting probably is better, especially if it's a brand new game.
 
I like to think that the $200 in late fees I piled up helped to sink that crapass movie store. Hollywood has sooooooooooo much better selection.
 
AnsarKing101 said:
What a shame...and I always get my movies from Blockbuster...:shakehead

Exact opposite here, we get ours from Hollywood Video. Mainly because the nearest Blockbuster is about 60 miles away, whereas, Hollywood is about 5-10 miles away.

I also agree with Fifty.
 
AnsarKing101 said:
I consider buying a stupidity...its not like you are going to see the movie again...lol, well, thats my opinion.:p

I watch a couple of dvds every weekend. I rewatch them all the time.
 
I always buy my DVD's nowadays. And if I don't, one of my friends will, and I can borrow. They're getting cheaper all the while (near-permanent sales on DVD's here).

And I watch nearly all my films more than once, especially the good ones. All you have to do is watch them a set number of times and you've hit the price of renting them out several dozen times :p
 
Back
Top Bottom