I waited to read here until I met all of the opponents in my game. Yesterday it finally happened (t137, 540 AD). As I said in the introductory thread, this is my first participation. So my expectations of my own game were low and I was not disappointed.
I made the typical rookie mistake of playing way too fast. I probably lack the ideas for useful strategic and tactical concepts. My micromanagement is far from ideal. I played the map (rainforest) for the first time with all its peculiarities, but had informed me beforehand.
Ok, here is my story. After much deliberation, I settled 1S, sacrificed two forests, but got three coasts less. Pigs in the second ring, great. The next long consideration: warrior or workers first? I chose the worker, although I believe it would have made little difference in this case. Since I have no experience with raging barbarians, my first goal was the great wall. A good decision when I think back to the barbarian caravans that later passed my borders. Mining, masonry and bronze working (copper close in the NNE!), and TGW in 2400 BC (t40), just in time for the barbarian onslaught. Tech path: Wheel - Agriculture - Fishing (both because of tech bonus) - Pottery - AH. Finally IW, longed to remove the damn jungle (t80, 1250 BC?). In the meantime (t68) I founded Prague near the copper and immediately had health problems in the city.
Meanwhile my scout tried to survive while he was exploring the map and two or three axe fighters swarmed out as scouts for the surrounding area, collected xp for woodman I and II. Later the great spy helped out with the exploration, visited Babylon and discovered, next to Hammurabi, Gilgamesh and Tokugawa the fourth opponent, Huayna Capac's scout near Babylon.
The whole time I felt like I was very slow. More workers than usual, cities spread in the WE axis. My next goal was to grow and research, so I built some huts and researched towards the calendar to open up its resources. Writing, math, sailing in between, also to set up a trade route to Babylon (2gpt per city). The third city was Vienna near the marble (t86). That gave me the opportunity for some failgold (pyramids). Shortly before the turn of the times I founded the fourth city near gem and dye and the fifth in the E for iron (!) and silk.
1 AD, I'm still researching the calendar, don't know two civilizations yet and I'm last. I don't have a complete picture of diplomacy (diplo is another weakness of my gameplay). So it might sound strange, but I still have the feeling that I can win the game. Strategically, I'm not in a bad position. The opponents are apparently not much further in research. None has alphabet. The barbarian city of Illinois with all its FPs will be attacked as soon as I have iron connected and swordsmen, and I have enough space in the hinterland for more cities in the future. Barbarians will be a plague (but also an xp source) for the others for a while, which will prevent them from growing.
I like the map and the setup and find it very exciting and challenging. The edges of the world take some getting used to. The two archers were a nice touch at the beginning. I first used them for scouting, now they protect two of my cities. However, they would have become important if I hadn't built the great wall in time. The coast next to the settler was a deception. In my opinion this would be an inland lake once I built a lighthouse. I can't even build a work boat.
I'll get back to you in the closing thread, even if I fail with a crash.