Campaign for the status quo!

Should CFC forum structure change?

  • No! It's fine as it is...

    Votes: 28 66.7%
  • I voted for a change in another thread...

    Votes: 8 19.0%
  • Miniscule quasiradioactive contaminated hamsters.

    Votes: 1 2.4%
  • Anything not Civ related is off topic spam...

    Votes: 5 11.9%

  • Total voters
    42

superslug

Still hatin' on Khan
Moderator
Hall of Fame Staff
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
11,629
Location
The Farm
Okay, this is a thread for those of us who love CFC just as it is to rally for NO change to the forum structure!

Exceptions:
1) The eventual return of the search function.
2) Any benefits VB3 is supposed to bring all of us (health coverage, coastal time share, company car, stock options, etc, etc.).
 
Originally posted by ainwood
I vote that this poll is best covered by a 'no change' vote in any one of the other polls, and that this poll be closed.
:lol: :goodjob:
As many threads as there are calling for change, I thought we should have at least one calling for none. Of course it is somewhat ironic that I'm arguing against all these threads with one of my own...:rolleyes: :D
 
Originally posted by Turner_727
BTW, I'm with you, ss.
That's mighty considerate of you.:goodjob: For that I'll forestall your pending execution. No promises about Lefty though... :mischief: :mwaha: :evil:
 
I can handle Lefty! He ain't nuthin! I can take him, I tell ya!

What?

Is he standing behind me?

/me ducks and scoots out of here.
 
Originally posted by Turner_727
I can handle Lefty!

The only poster I know of that can handle Lefty is TF himself. :confused: Hey, wait a minute! Why do you have multiple log ons on your own site?!:eek:

Funny, we seem to be enjoying ourselves with the site just as it is this morning. This just reinforces there's no need to change things...or maybe it just reinforces there's no need to provide more spamming oppurtunities.:lol:
 
Ya got me! Just like Brubaker!

Nah. . . If I was TF, I'd be banning people left and right.

Threads would be closed, forums disrupted, and the mods would be required to bring me a six pack of beer each week. The staff fridge would be mine, MINE! :evil:
 
Each mod a six pack per week, eh? Well, your identity may be in question, but your alcoholism sure isn't.:beer:

Threads closed and forums disrupted, and yet you voted for no change...well, I can't give you any change anyway. I only carry $20's...:cool:

Now, does anyone else care to post in support of the spamus quo?
 
Originally posted by The Person
I don't see the point with this thread...

There's threads begging for Civ4 forums, Politics forums, Science forums, etc, etc, etc. I'm here asking for nothing!
 
Intresting this is the busiest I have seen SF in since I came here. :hmm: I'll vote when I get to school in a bit, unable to vote now for. No change is good.
 
I just checked the Politics and Science polls. The no-change crowd seems to be winning!
 
I would have to be against this (I know, we ALL expect me to be against this when I'm campaigning for a change . . . ). I do not like the Status Quo. Whenever you go to OT, you see about half Politics Threads. This seems like there would be sufficient interest to have a seperate Politics (and Current Events?) Forum.

On a side note, SF is being visited more now . . .
 
Where is the "I want a change, any change" vote? :mad:
 
I really don't see what's wrong with the Forums as they are. It is quite annoying seeing a new thread every 2nd day requesting that there are more additions.
If everything was to have it's own forum, then there would be no off topic.
What Col and Ainwood said in the 1st page of RealGoober's thread pretty much sums it up for me.
 
Back
Top Bottom