Sims2789
Fool me once...
Originally posted by Sarevok
Certainly not me![]()
don't judge us just on a few idiot Republican Governers/Actors we've "elected." it's really a nice place.
Originally posted by Sarevok
Certainly not me![]()
Originally posted by Sims2789
don;t judge us just on a few idiot Republican Governers/Actors we've "elected." it's really a nice place with a culture that is more-and-more Mexican influenced with every day that passes.
Originally posted by cgannon64
Has California ever made sense to anyone?
Originally posted by Sims2789
don't judge us just on a few idiot Republican Governers/Actors we've "elected." it's really a nice place.
The California Liberation Front is a grass-roots political movement, devoted to building awareness and support for local democracy, global community, and the freedom and eventual independence of the California Republic from the United States of America. The CLF advocates political activism, guerrilla advertising, and underground networking and organization throughout California and throughout the world. We also sell really dope merchandise.
I'm no expert, but I think the day Californians agree to 5 years of mandatory military service is the day this happens:Originally posted by gorn
Require a minimum 5 years compulsory military service for citizenship, open the border with Mexico, and you'd probably be looking at the third or fourth largest army in the world.
Hey, Killington has damn good reason to succede, Howard Dean!Originally posted by jpowers
Maybe California, Quebec and Killington, VT can form their own nation and let the rest of North America get on with its business.
Originally posted by Sims2789
no, it just makes whoever designed this flag look like a non-serious screw-off. if it was in angry font then you'd be right. now, it just looks absurd. if anything it makes the bear look like a crazy, angry drunk about to get in a bar fight with a t-rex.
Originally posted by Shadylookin
succesion is a stuipd idea for any state. There is no reason too, other than to fulfil the dreams of psycho liberals. Then there is the fact that no state is prepared to assume the duties of an independant nation. let us not forget the invasion that would happen soon after.
as for the issue at hand I have to agree 55% is way too low. sure it the majority, but you have 45% unhappy with the whole thing. mabey they should learn to compromise.
just like all californians![]()
Originally posted by IglooDude
You apparently aren't familiar with Alaska's situation, then - they don't even have psycho liberals there, they DO have plenty of oil (while the US Congress is preventing them from drilling into ANWR), and the Feds directly "own" a third of the state or so, giving the local population quite the ax to grind.
True, however you will never see this country as a whole be a democracy. Nor would that necessarily be a desirable thing. Although each state is guaranteed a republican form of government however a true democracy in any state probably wont happen.Originally posted by Duddha
Minority rule is not democracy.
I think that when it comes to the State budget the majority of california representatives should be able to pass what the majority wants them to pass, which is a democratic budget plan (they would have voted for republicans if they wanted their budget).
55% is the majority, 2/3 is a hyper-majority. Imagine if this were true for the national legislature.
Originally posted by Shadylookin
the feds own everything, really were just renting our land. if you didnt' pay your taxes they would take your house and possesions.
anyone crazy enough to live in alaska has some problems.![]()
they may have plenty of oil, but i doubt they can rasie up enough tax dollars to pay for drilling. I still don't believe alaska can run on it's own, especially with some of the disasters they get.