Garvarg
Playing with fire
Ok, maybe someone can help me here.
I keep reading about people attacking cities and dragging along a lot of cannons or catapults. Are they really worth the trouble? Usuall when attacking I have knights or similar fast moving attack squads, and trying to get deep into an enemy territory just takes too long if I drag along a bunch of good defence forces, but I usually do, because it help to keep my attack force healthy.
So why take catapults or cannons? They just don't seem very effective. They miss a lot of the tme, ruin barracks and graineries instead of damaging their defenders. I would rather put my resources into building more of knights\cavalry than cataputlts\cannons.
Am I missing something?
I keep reading about people attacking cities and dragging along a lot of cannons or catapults. Are they really worth the trouble? Usuall when attacking I have knights or similar fast moving attack squads, and trying to get deep into an enemy territory just takes too long if I drag along a bunch of good defence forces, but I usually do, because it help to keep my attack force healthy.
So why take catapults or cannons? They just don't seem very effective. They miss a lot of the tme, ruin barracks and graineries instead of damaging their defenders. I would rather put my resources into building more of knights\cavalry than cataputlts\cannons.
Am I missing something?