CapNES2: The New Shuffle (A preview thread.)

Capulet

RESTART
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
4,092
The History:

Napoleon's mind was occupied - as always - by many, many problems that he needed to think through. For instance, the American affair. The Americans were needed as allies against Britain, and they also wanted Louisiana. That is, they supposedly wanted New Orleans, but Napoleon knew that, well, there would hardly be any point to keeping the rest of Louisiana after selling its most important city. The most obvious solution would be to sell Louisiana to USA and to cement the alliance, to persuade the USA to attack the British...

...but there was another solution, less obvious perhaps, but with great potential. Much of the American concern was about the rights of deposit. These rights would be granted. Napoleon had no illusions about his chances of holding on to Louisiana; the British would certainly capture them. But that would be encircling the USA, which will make its ruling elite - and no matter their democracy and whatnot, the Americans DID have a certain ruling elite, which incidentally was largely anglophobic - panic. Thus USA will have to go to war with Britain... Distracting British attention from the French. And while Britain and USA fought it out in Louisiana and Canada, France will be free to deal with other problems. If not with Britain itself...

The year was 1803.

---

Napoleon's ploy failed, sort of. The Americans were temporarily satisfied with the deposit rights, but the British were cautious about it, as the war with France resumed. In 1805, the battle of Trafalgar (slightly different from OTL due to less British ships there, and with two British ships actually sunk for butterfly reasons) ruined all possible plans Napoleon might have had for an invasion of Britain. In 1806, the Americans again resumed LOTS of pressure on France to acquire Lousiana, but before Napoleon could give them any real reply...

...On June 20th 1806, British forces landed in New Orleans. Recently, there was concern over a possible Franco-American alliance; also, there was some fear of Napoleon's agents, acting from Louisiana, instigating some border accidents or somesuch. Generally, it was decided that better be safe then sorry, especially if being safe involved isolating USA. While the Senate was filled with debates, the British, though some clever negotiations with the various small local towns and forts, as well as the natives, established control over Louisiana.

The War of 1806 was on. The British, by now sure of their safety from Napoleon, could commit to it in full. The Americans pushed into Louisiana, but in the Battle at New Orleans, a Dublin-born minor aristocrat whose star first shined in India, at Assaye, back then known as Arthur Wellesly (but later and better known as 1st Duke of New-Orleans), stopped American forces dead in their tracks using the naval support and the local topography with great success.

The war went on. American forces were gradually defeated by the well-led, if smaller (but augmented by the natives, one might add) British forces, but the (rather rare) British attacks on original American territory faced determined milita resistance. In the sea, the British, after some early shortcomings, brought in their full force (or most of it, anyway) to the battle, and the American fleet lost at Cheasepeake Bay in 1807. American economy was collapsing, especially in New England, where increasingly, the Jeffersonian American government was viewed as a warmongering slaveholding southerner imperialist gang of thieves (that's a stretch!) who sent off young New Englander men (well, some of them anyway) to die in the name of conquest of new territories to where they would extend slavery. And, what hurt even more, they ruined all chances of reconciliation with Britain! The New Englander economy was in near-ruins without the British trade! They are all lackeys of that damned Napoleon! Etc! And the British were quite happy at this. As happy as to burn down Washington in 1807 and also in the same year to land forces led by the same Duke of New-Orleans (after all, not much was happening in South Louisiana now) in North Massachussets (aka Maine). Linking up with the British forces in Canada, New-Orleans advanced along the coast. The British contaced the New Englander separatists, and, after some very very prolonged negotiations, worked out a deal. New England would become a British dominion, but a one with a great degree of autonomy. The economic situation was desperate; it was certain to get worse; the American army was definitely losing (it certainly didn't look as if it was winning or... um... "drawing"), and the fleet already lost (not strictly true, but rather close to it). And besides, the British weren't all that bad... And think of the prosperity that will come with this "autonomous dominion" status! After arguing on some minor clauses, the separatists - led by Timothy Pickering - agreed. The Dominion of New England came into existance on August 9th 1807.

This shocked the American government. At first, they hoped to rally the people of New England against "that new Benedict Arnold" Pickering who "sold New England to the red-shirts", but, though this did get some support in New England, and in fact a lot initially, after the first two weeks Timothy Pickering succesfully persuaded a fair majority of New England's population that this was the way to go. The great extent of autonomy was stressed upon; it was commented, if unofficially, that USA was probably going to cede New England to the British anyway. It was losing, wasn't it? And the southern imperialists etc etc would be only glad to get rid of the honest, industrious, etc, etc people of New England...

USA still resisted, great battles were fought throughout New England, but only rarely - like at Gettysberg in 1809, when Andrew Jackson defeated the British contingent plus the newly-formed New English army - did the Americans actually win. Sure, no invasions into the southern states were succesful, but the status quo could be maintained by the British indefinitely... the time was not on USA's side. And so, with a heavy heart, Thomas Jefferson agreed for negotiations. In Richmond, the new American capital, on April 11th 1810, the War of "1806" was over. The treaty was definitely a treaty signed by the winners; indeed, Thomas Jefferson was so outraged by it (he only agreed to it due to the fact that otherwise it could only get worse) that he soon after resigned from public life. America recognized Louisiana as British; Dominion of New England spanned (includingly) from Pennsylvania to North Massachussets, all includingly. And USA also lost Michigan territory, plus some more land around the Great Lakes, to Britain directly.

But what of Europe? Britain was doing not quite as well here. It had not much forces to spend in late 1807, when the French invaded and occupied Portugal; thus, no great success. Indeed, no success at all, as the French forces ruled supreme in the Iberian Peninsula after the Spanish Campaign of 1808-9, where Napoleon himself led his forces to victory against the Spanish and the British (led by Sir John Moore) alike, outside of Gibraltar that is. Napoleon knew the futility of assaulting the Rock any time soon, so he simply focused on the Continental System instead. Oh, and Joseph Bonaparte got crowned in Madrid; after the British grabbed up all Portuguese colonies and after rebels killed general Andoche Junot in Lisbon, Joseph was also crowned in Lisbon, and Portugal, as in late 16th century, became a part of Spain. After that, resistance was succesfully stomped out in most of Spain and Portugal by early 1810, thus the British abandoned all hopes of renewing the war in Iberia.

Peace reigned until June 1st, 1812. It was then that British diplomacy persuaded Russia, Austria and Prussia to join into the "Fourth Coalition"... against you-know-who. Austrian forces plunged into Grand Duchy of Warsaw, Bavaria and (North) Italy; Prussians too attacked Warsaw, but also the French garrisons in Prussia and Saxony; the British, sensing a new opportunity, landed in Hannover (the electorate). And the Russian armies, led by Kutuzov and Bagration, help crush Warsaw within two weeks. Indeed, it was not hard to imagine Napoleonic France collapsing at the hands of its multiple opponents... Surely not even Napoleon's genius could ward off such a grand coalition!

But it so happened that by the time Warsaw was crushed, Duke New-Orleans, though advancing as far as Hannover, was stopped short at Brunswick. Austrians and Prussians expected that Napoleon would now try to crush the British; wrong. On June 22nd, Frederick Wilhelm III was most surprised to notice Napoleon's standards outside of Berlin. The city was assaulted and burned down, as a lesson to all traitors; Frederick Wilhelm III disappeared, according to the rumors either becoming a hermit, either commiting suicide. Some Prussian forces, under Blucher and York, fought on even after that, but they were demoralized and essentially subservient to the Russian emperor during the war. A few days later, New-Orleans was defeated in the Second Battle of Brunswick, and was forced to withdraw rather then be cut off from Bremen by Napoleon's cavalry. And meanwhile, Joachim Murat engaged and defeated Austrians at Padua. Then things developped quickly. Schwarzenberg and Erzherzog Karl were defeated in July, at Leipzig and Augsburg respectively. Still, for a moment not all seemed lost for the Coalition; Kutuzov defeated a French force under Massena at Hirschberg on July 9th. But the Russo-Austrian forces, led by Bagration and the Erzherzog were defeated on July 27th at Krems. It was hard to envy the fate of Berlin; thus, Kaiser Franz I soon signed peace with Napoleon, ceding the Illyrian Provinces to France (note: due to a shorter Peninsular War, no 1809 Austrian Campaign) and entire Galicia to the enlarged Grand Duchy of Warsaw. Oh, and Franz I was essentially turned into a puppet ruler. Alexander I was outraged; he declared war on Austria, and only Napoleon's timely intervention prevented the regroupped Russian forces from burning down Vienna. On August 8th, in a great battle at Liegnitz, the Russian forces under Kutuzov were crushed. Alexander I soon after took command personally, against the best advice of his advisors. It was at Poznan, on August 20th, that two great armies - one under Napoleon, other under Alexander - met. In a huge, long, bloody battle, even Napoleon's Grand Armee was bloodied. But in the end, it was Napoleon who triumphed; Alexander I died in battle. Napoleon soon after stood poised to invade Russia. To add to Russia's troubles, Bernadotte's Sweden sided with the winners and invaded Finland again. The new Tsar, Constantine I, reacted quickly after seeing the casualty lists and the reports on the state of his army - he signed peace, reinstated the Continental System and promised that he never shall conspire against Napoleon. He also ceded Finland to Sweden and Lithuania to Warsaw, and paid reparations to France. Prussia was also dismantled: while Pommerania was gained by Sweden, Silesia, East Prussia and Danzig went to Grand Duchy of Warsaw, while Brandenburg became part of the Rhenish Confederation.

Realizing that all of their potential allies were now crushed, the British were forced to minimize hostilities; but they knew that as long as Napoleon was still in charge, negotiations were impossible. The military war, for all purposes, was over; but the economic war of attrition was only beginning.

This was Napoleon's finest hour. By a series of treaties, he united almost all of Europe; at the Versailles Congress, he enforced the "Napoleonic System".
 
1812-1832.

For the while, nothing much was happening in North (or rather "non-Latin") America. USA, embittered, was electing Virginian after Virginian (which was not neccessarily a bad thing) and sliding down into semi-isolation, New England was picking the benefits of intensive trade with Britain, and vice versa (Napoleon was very irritated by this, but, as he still did not have a fleet large enough to challenge the British at sea, he couldn't quite complain). Slowly, Canada and Louisiana expanded westwards; Louisiana soon bumped into the borders of the new nation of Mexico, and the Treaty of Veracruz, signed between Britain and Mexico to ensure good trading relations and solve possible land disputes in the earnest, fortified the modern borders between British Louisiana and Mexico (OTL western border of Louisiana Purchase, more-or-less, but also with the addition of much of OTL Oregon territory within Louisiana). The British Canadians also "captured" Alaska, or rather the Russians withdrew all claims to it and the Alaskan colonists (not a real lot of people) petitioned for British "protection", out of lack of anything better to do.

It was only natural that, after the Iberian Campaigns, and after the British blockade severed the last physical links between the various Spanish colonies and the metropoly (and also grabbed Philippines plus Spanish African colonies, to add to their already impressive empire - especially if one were to remember about all those Dutch colonies still in the British hands), the situation in Latin America was deteriorating quickly for the "colonial" authorities.

By 1812, Miguel Hidalgo (alongside with such men as Jose Maria Morelos) was leading a great lower-class (uniting Creoles and natives alike) rebel army that crushed the (rather weak) opposition of the viceroyal forces in Mexico. Indeed, it was that very year - the year of the Fourth Coalition in Europe - that was the year of Mexico City's fall to the rebels. The early rebellion was a ragtag mix of religious fanatics and liberal thinkers, "near-bandits" and "near-saints", but by 1812 its leaders managed to make the movement more organized and disciplinned, and less likely to fall apart after the victory. Albeit there was some revolutionary terror (disencouraged by Hidalgo) like in France, generally Mexico was not as bad as it could have been. On May 8th 1812, the egalitarian, democratic constitution of the Estados Unidos Mexicanos (EEUUMM), or the United States of Mexico (USM), was adopted. By the end of the year, the remaining viceroyalists were crushed; general Agustin Iturbide, the commander of the last organized viceroyalist forces, was guillotined, along with several other bigwigs of the Viceroyalty. Mexico, a land of much potential if ruled well, was making its first steps into history. Stretching from Texas and California to Costa Rica (all those includingly), it overnight became the largest independant state in the Western Hemisphere. Towards 1832, it developped peacefully, despite the occasional conflicts with various natives and a failed coup attempt by Santa Anna. Miguel Hidalgo, the first Presidente, died in 1815; still, despite grief, his cause for building democracy in Mexico was carried on by Jose Maria Morelos, and indeed, despite the still-undefeated corruption and the Amerind-Creole strife in 1828-1830, it seemed like Mexico would become an example for other Latin American democracies.

In South America, west of the British Guyanna (all three of them united into one, actually) and British Brazil, there be strife similar to Mexican... but worse. This was the situation in 1820, after the dust of the Liberation Wars settled over the continent: the British-backed Francisco de Miranda was the founder and first (and only) prime minister and regent of the "Great Incan Empire" stretching from Venezuela to Charcas (OTL Bolivia); further south, there was the Provinces de la Plata (Paraguay, Uraguay, Argentina) and the Republic of Chile. By 1822, though, the "Great Incan Empire" collapsed into two states: Gran Columbia (you know the drill) and Peruvian Republic (including OTL Bolivia as well as Peru). Thus, the continent was divided between four states; but all four were unstable and filled with corruption, and apart from Gran Columbia (and even that only in its early years) all these were ruled by de facto military juntas. La Plata and Gran Columbia succesfully managed to get into good relations and trade with Britain, though.

The "Cold War" as the Britain-France economic standoff was often labelled brought great damage to the economy of both countries; ultimately, though, it was France and the rest of Europe that suffered more. Nationalist movements were rising. Twelve attempts were made on Napoleon's life within just two months in 1821.

Russian economy was perhaps the worst off; without the trade with Britain, it quickly begun to stagnate, and anti-French tensions were rising here as well. Thus the fall of Napoleonic System begun in Russia. On November 3rd 1822, Tsar Constantine was killed by a bombist. On the same day, Pavel Ivanovich Pestel led a Guards regiment to the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg; the Imperial family members (those of them who failed to flee to France or to Britain depending on sentiments) were ruthlessly executted; Pestel's "Russian Truth" was, after some editing, adopted as the constitution of the new Russian Republic. Aristocracy, monarchy, serfdom - all that was abolished, Pestel was elected the "dictator of the revolution" for the goal of stabilizing the situation and making the changes necessary. The revolutionary terror begun against the nobles who did not immediately abandon their titles and lands and made a pledge of loyalty to the "Provisional Senate" (which had an advisory role). Surprisingly large parts of the army proved to be in support of Pestel; however, in Moscow a large royalist counter-revolutionary movement was formed; it was there that the young Nicholas I was crowned, under the regency of graf Aleksey Andreyevich Arakcheyev. This movement - naturally - gained support of Napoleon, who knew that Pestel was unlikely to be as cooperative as any Tsarist regime, and who by then was definitely reactionary (that is, having already introduced the Napoleon Code and so forth, he opposed any further changes). Franco-Tsarist forces, led by Napoleon himself, marched at St. Petersburg, harassed by partisans and bad weather; there was a good reason for the timing of the coup. Davidov led a brilliant guerrila campaign, but finally, St. Petersburg was reached. After a bitter battle between the Guards - the best of Russian army - reinforced by the volunteers and the numerous conscripts on one side and the Franco-Tsarist forces on the other, St. Petersburg was taken... however, Pestel was not to be found there. He managed to escape beforehand, and, with a small contingent of the guards and a ragtag "peasant army", marched towards Moscow...

This war of maneuver continued for some time, until Napoleon fell ill. The Russian winter did what the bombs, the bullets and the poison of the assassins could not; Napoleon died on January 9th 1823. The French army soon after withdrew from Russia; the death of Napoleon inspired a new German uprising. And already, the struggle for power begun amongst his Marshalls, ministers and relatives; finally, Napoleon II was crowned Emperor, but due to his young age a triumvirate of Davout, Marie-Louise and Talleyrand was set up as regents.

The economical collapse coincided with the German rebellion which, though crushed in several battles, still persisted. That was the crumbling of the whole system. Austrians were as hasty as to try and grab the Illyrian Provinces, but they were defeated by Murat again. Bernadotte, in Sweden, was the first one to distance himself from France and its Continental System (not that he ever was particularily involved in it; he personally organized contraband trade with Britain); soon after, Murat, sensing that the new French government was going to screw everything up, entered negotiations with Britain and with the Pope. He left the Continental System and was (after promising to recognize a small bit of Rome as Pope's very own state, Vatican) crowned the "king of Italy"; soon after, he managed to make good on that claim, uniting Italy (as much of it as he could; that ultimately included Corsica and much of Piedmont as well) and moving capital to Rome. The Triumvirate was outraged, but they had other things to do - they were dismantling Austria. Ney was crowned "king of Austria-Bohemia"; Macdonald was crowned the king of Hungary. Problem was, that made them effectively independant. The wily Talleyrand outricked his fellow triumvirs and managed to grab de facto power in France. But for all that might be said about him, he trully saved the wrecks of the empire. Withdrawing from faraway holdings, abandoning the north German coast, he preserved Netherlands, Belgium, Rhineland, Catalonia and Savoy for France and somewhat stabilized it.

These days were often compared to the Diadochi period in Hellenic Asia that followed Alexander's death.

Finally, by 1832, Europe somewhat stabilized. The Napoleonic-Continental System was in ruins. The still-Bonaparte-led Spain was still a French ally, if a more free one now. Italy and Sweden-Denmark-Norway (SDN; Bernadotte couldn't pass up such an opportunity, not after the British gave their approval for this one) were probably neutrals. The new German Confederation, a reformed version of the Rhenish one which also gobbled up Austria after Ney's death in the Battle at Frankendorf, under a sudden returnee from the history of a dead empire... Klemens von Metternich, the Bundskanzler. Hungary is still reigned by the Macdonald dynasty; Adam I Czartoryski is the king of Poland. The Russian Republic, despite its many initial problems, did eventually endure and crushed the Tsarists, while much of the surviving aristocracy is currently in a large emigre community in London. Oh, and Pestel is still the Dictator of the Republic (not the revolution anymore. That's progress!), he is however actually bringing about some comparatively positive changes for Russia and is also improving relations with the new European powers after the British opposition to him under emigre pressure. Russia is in a rather bad state of affairs after the economic breakdown and the civil war, but now it is quickly trying to modernize, and that is not unlikely to work.

And lastly, some things about Asia. Generally, both Ottoman Empire and Persia are considerably stronger then in OTL; yes, the Ottoman Empire still has a lot of problems, but here, with a weakened, troubled Russia and the earlier British intervention against Muhammad Ali with full return of Egypt to Ottoman control (Muhammad Ali was rightfully feared as a French ally), it has a real chance to fix them. Both Ottoman Empire and Persia are good British allies; both of them are using British help to reform and modernize... moderately. Moderately and slowly. Persia is also expanding into the vacuum of power that came after the collapse of the Afghan empire. Burma is another state that managed to sign a good treaty with Britain; timely reaction to Britain de facto monopolizing colonization of Southeast Asia (well, so it justifiably seemed back then) made the Burmese realize where is strenght. Thus, Burma too begun (even more slowly) modernizing, or rather just allowed in the missionaries while the British allowed the Burmese to carry on with their conquest of Siam.

British colonization of Australia is rather slower then in OTL; on the other hand, conquest of India is faster.
 
1832-1870:

North America: The last free parts of the continent were grabbed during this period.

Gradually, Canada begun following the way of New England, becoming a Dominion (though not yet nearly as autonomous as New England, but overtime becoming freer and freer) stretching from the Aleut Islands to Newfoundland. Louisiana will probably one day follow that path as well, but has two notable differences: first, there are much more natives there, who are a considerable political force, having gained autonomous province status in Oklahoma and Sioux (roughly in Montana region); second, the local French and Cajuns are quite separatist, as are some of the British settlers here, in fact an underground movement already drafted (in 1868) a secret "Constitution of the Louisiana Confederation". As a part of the "de-overstretchment" envisioned by PM Jacob Malborough, British Honduras and Mosquito Protectorate were sold to the good British allies (as it was seen back then) in Mexico in 1861, in exchange for naval base rights in several Mexican Atlantic and Pacific ports.

Independant in all but in name and some aspects of foreign policy (well, basically, New England is a British ally and is not allowed to ally with British enemies), New England was a prosperous, industrialized land. It is also the home to many great technologic inventions, especially in the field of engineering.

By 1870, USA has already quite recovered, that is to say it left isolation somewhat and got involved in trade. Attitudes here are still clearly anti-British and pro-French. Slavery was abolished in 1848; by then, it became obviously unprofitable, and besides, that was the time of a great war scare with Britain, and thus the US Senate's war hawks begun advising reform to industrialize and better compete with the "envelopping red-shirt threat". Thus, USA is somewhat industrialized by 1870, though its core is still primarily rural. Oh, and the unstable Spanish colonies in the Carribbean Sea (well, by then they disintegrated into chaotic fighting between various class-based/race-based/other groups) were succesfully seized in 1853, 1854 and 1859 respectively; this nearly led to a new Anglo-American war. All it did lead to is Britain establishing a Protectorate over Haiti, which was afraid of USA, and declaring that the "balance of power has been upheld".

As previously mentioned, Mexico gained British Honduras and the Mosquito Protectorate. It also gained Hawaii in 1842-1845 (a steady process of integration), and also build the Nicaragua Canal during much of the 1860s, as based on the grand vision of the New England-born engineer, Robert Lincoln. Generally, Mexico was on good or at least tolerable terms with most other countries, slowly expanding its influnce into the Pacific Ocean. Mexico also lived through a failed military coup in 1849 and three major rebellions in Yucatan, the largest of which begun in 1852, when, for three years, an independant "Mayan Republic" persisted in the jungles. But other then that, Mexico is doing well, and will do even better soon as its vast mineral resources will be reinforced by even more vast petroleum ones, as the world slowly progresses into the Modern Age (slowly. Its not too much more advanced then in OTL, really). The British regard it as an ally... little do they know of the secret negotiations between Mexico City, Richmond DC and Paris...

South America: No need to elaborate actually. Same processes continued, as did attempts at industrialization, the British traded land for land in the Amazon Rainforest region and established new borders, however by the end of the period the Provinces de la Plata has been turned into the Platine Empire, which was a good British ally and the most advanced South American independant state; it also in 1860 bought the Falkland islands from Britain (see de-overstretchment, previously mentioned). Brazil nearly became a Dominion, but Marbolough's political suicide with the proposal for an "Irish Dominion" coincided with a South Brazilian rebellion and with the Parliament noticing the growing importance of rubber in the World Market, so nothing came out of it; instead, it was joined with the Guineas into the Commonwealth of British South America.

Europe: Britain was largely isolationist in Europe until the coming of the Russian War in 1843 (see Russia). After the victory there, Britain again largely withdrew from European affairs, though developing good relations with SDN and Poland while worsening them with Spain, France and Italy, that by then were allied. As for itself, Britain industrialized, fought Irish rebels, and generally was an economic powerhouse.

Napoleon II's actual rule in France was said to begin in 1833, albeit Talleyrand kept considerable influence over him. Napoleon II at first seemed easy to manipulate, but after Talleyrand's death, Napoleon II suddenly showed force. First, in 1835-1836, there was the Swiss War, an indecisive three-way standoff between France, Germany and Switzerland, or rather the few remaining Swiss unionist cantons; eventually, Napoleon negotiated the Treaty of Bern as Switzerland ceased to exist, dividing Switzerland between France, Germany and Italy. This also marked the reapproachment of the Bonopartes and the Murats. Napoleon II proved a very popular emperor, and also proved capable to "go with the flow" so to speak, introducing occasional liberal reforms to the cheers of the masses. It was also during his time that Algiers was conquered, and also during his time that in 1840 the "Tripartite Alliance" was signed between Spain, France and Italy. He lived for a long time, still alive (if rather old and ill) in 1870. While his father, Napoleon I, was called "Napoleon the Great", he himself was "Napoleon the Just" or the "People's Emperor". Spain and Italy were by then ruled by Joseph II and Umberto I respectively.

The SDN, under the Bernadotte dynasty, was undergoing industrialization as well, and became a wealthy state, not to mention one of the most advanced of the world. It was - as mentioned - a good British ally.

German Confederation was, as time went by, both (somewhat) centralized and renamed into the Holy Roman Empire, with a largely-powerless Kaiser and a strong Reichskanzler. The capital was firmly placed at Nuremburg, which was given special status within the (still rather loose) Empire. HRE had no particular attachments to anyone, though it wasn't friendly with neither France nor Poland; still, it avoided wars for the moment, while improving relations with Hungary.

In the Danubean War (1839-1842), the Ottoman Empire lost Moldavia and Wallachia to Hungary; but afterwards, the Ottomans succeeded in preventing further terirtorial loss, despite the griveous atrocities that followed this (more on the Ottoman Empire in the Africa and Middle East). Hungary, for its part, was in the 1843-1871 period ruled by Alexander I Macdonald, who did much to reform and modernize Hungary and disciplinne its army into one of the best of Europe, hard as it might have been.

This was uneasy time in Russia. After Pestel's sudden death on 1834, his "political will" was published, and in the vacuum of power, it was actually carried out - a new Senate was assembled and granted full power. However, Russia was still unstable, and though the political genius of the First Consul, Alexander Sergeyevich Pushkin, kept it on the float and allowed Russia to begin industrialization, it proved not enough. Pushkin was assasinated by a tsarist in 1839. By 1840, the Senate once more lost power, this time to a military strongman, General Nemidov. Nemidov ruthlessly combated opposition and forced through expensive, ill-planned industrialization; luckily, he came to his senses soon enough, and slowed it down. Then he got to reorganizing the army - created the Svoboda, Ravenstvo and Bratstvo (Freedom, Equality, Fraternity) Guards, three elite units. Hell-bent on making Russia great again, Nemidov in 1843 provoked a war with the Ottoman Empire over the contested area of Caucasus, feeling the Turks weak after the Danubean War. Russian forces advanced well into Armenia by the end of the year - the SRN guards routed a large Ottoman Army at Poti. The Russian Black Sea Fleet triumphed at Mys Sarich. It was then that the British organized a coalition of themselves, Ottoman Empire, Persia and Poland to combat Russian agression. Surprisingly, Nemidov was apparently not too surprised; his forces were quick to respond to the Polish invasion, and the Poles were defeated at Minsk; Persians were defeated at Siyazan. The SDN by then however too joined the anti-Russian coalition, and finally, together the Anglo-Swedish expeditionary force succesfully took Riga, while a larger British force landed in Crimea, soon reinforced by the Turks after the Russian fleet was defeated by the British at Sevastopol. The Russian Baltic Sea fleet performed admirably, defeating the SDN fleet at Visby and defending the Gulf of Finland from the superior British fleet; this was largely due to Admiral Prokhorov. Still, on the land only few Russian units apart from the SRN guards that were in Armenia and Aizerbadjan were serious competition for their enemies; ever since the Civil War, the core of the Russian army was formed from the peasants, and though they were good at irregular warfare, their enemies were smart enough to realize that and thus did not attack deep into Russia itself; rather, they fought near the coast. By 1845, the Russians lost control over much of the Baltic Coast, Senatsk (former St. Petersburg) was besieged, the Baltic Sea Fleet exhausted and annihilated and finally the SRN guards, without much supplies, ceased their offensives in Transcaucasia. Crimea, too, was in Anglo-Turkish hands. The Poles have again attacked Minsk, and took it. Finally, in early 1846, Nemidov was killed by a cannonball at Senatsk; soon after, a provisional government led by Lev Lvovich Bronskiy signed peace with the anti-Russian coalition. SDN has gained a bit of small islands in the Baltic Sea and also parts of Karelia; Poland gained Courland, Podolia, West Ukraine and Belarus (basically, all territory lost in Third and Second Partitions of Poland to Russia, except for Lithuania which was regained earlier); Turkey and Persia partitioned the Caucasian Mountains south of Kuban river, territories north were recognized under Russia. Central Asia too was partitioned, but between Russia and Persia: the southern two-fifths went to Persia, the rest went to Russia, but ofcourse Persia gained the best lands in Central Asia by this deal; ofcourse, the local rulers were yet to be confronted with that declaration...

Bronskiy's consulate lasted until the elections, surprisingly enough; but in 1851, it was once more displaced, this time by Oleg Mikhailovich Petrov. Petrov, a quiet lawyer, was thought to be easy to manipulate by many political factions in Russia; this guaranteed his rise to power. Then Petrov, though with a Senate that was de facto powerless, established his "blackcoat" secret police; it attacked all leaders of major political factions that tried to manipulate him, either killing them secretly in "accidents" or putting them up for trial. The army, or, rather, the Stavka was ruthlessly purged under a pretext of a planned military coup, which is quite likely. However, after the first two years of Petrov's rule rooted out all opposition, Russia finally saw some good times. Modernization and industrialization continued, Russia improved relations with Europe, Petrov in 1855 officially reconciled with the exiled aristocracy, though not restoring their titles. Foreign investors were enthusiastic about Russian expanding economy; meanwhile, a cultural renaissance, the "Silver Age of Russian Literature", begun, especially as some of the more liberal-minded of the aristocracy, headed by Herzen (similar to OTL Herzen, though different in a way), returned as mere citizens. The de-radicalization of the Senate (powerless though it was) also took place, as more moderate-liberal views were encouraged, as long as they did not question Petrov's decisions. Occasionally, "accidents" still did happen to some generals and senators, but they became not as widespread; Petrov was solidly in control, and had nothing to fear. It was rather obvious that he died in 1864; he was shot. After him, the Senate again took over, for longer then usual. (More on Russia in the Far East)

Africa: Slowly, European and Ottoman power expanded into the continent. In North Africa, 1843 was a very interesting year. To mark the third anniversary of the signing of the Tripartite Alliance, Spain invaded Morocco, France invaded Algeria and (after promising the Turks financial compensation to help their war effort against Russia) Italy invaded Tunisia. The Ottomans did not concede any more territory after that, ofcourse; towards 1870, the reformed and somewhat modernized Turks expanded south, down the Nile and across the Red Sea, eventually taking Eritrea as well and conquering much of Ethiopia in spite of serious resistance; the Ottomans have entered a new era of expansion under their great new ruler, Sultan Abdulhamid III, and this time it was mostly southward. Technically, during this time French Algiers and Spanish Morocco too expanded south greatly. British colonies were many, but the British expansion was slow, as Britain was overextended and much resources went to putting down rebellions in India and colonizing Australia. Still, the British West Africa already begun to emerge... France also used the temporary improvement of Anglo-French relations to buy back some of its colonies, perhaps most significantly Ste Marie and Reunion islands; from there, the French established a protectorate over Madagascar.

Middle East: Ottoman power expanded into the deserts and more faraway coastlines of Arabia; Persians rebuilt their Central Asian Empire; India was during this period united under British rule, despite spreadout rebellions, especially the Great Sepoy Rebellion of 1861-1865. Life went on, but the two of British Middle Eastern allies begun to squabble amongst each other, and little did the British know, but French military advisors participated in the modernization of the Persian army...

Far East: By now, the divergences here became major...

The giant of China had a very rude awakening in these times. First, in 1834, the new Russian Senate, seeking to make a show of force, defied the force of logistics and marched a huge army to reclaim the Amur region, which was sold to China in 17th century. The Chinese didn't quite have any serious forces nearby to prevent Russian takeover in the province, and when a Chinese army tried (unsuccesfully) to reclaim it next year, it was defeated and in this "Amurian War" China also lost Ussuri province (it would reclaim it in 1845, something not recognized by the Russian government). But if this humiliation was not enough, China also faced, in 1850s, a great uprising, the Taiping Rebellion. Against the very unpopular ruling emperor, the Taipings made great success, besieging Beijing; the Emperor himself died in battle. But this was for the good, as the new Lung-di Emperor rose to power and defeated the Taipings, first near Beijing and later at Nanking. Sensing China's weakness and backwardness, which was aptly demonstrated by then, Lung-di, a man of great administrative ability, begun the long process of modernization. Ofcourse, he faced large domestic opposition, but the Taiping Rebellion shook China's integrity as much as to make this kind of reform possibly. The central point was played here by the British, ofcourse, to whom Lung-di Emperor promised assistance against Russia, if needed. The British, still not quite certain of their positions against the finally-improving Russian state, agreed (they assisted the Qing previously during the Taiping Rebellion, and thus also saw this as gratitude). Long story cut short, Lung-di's reforms, hated as they were by the more reactionary/conservative elements in China, possibly saved the Empire; most important of these reforms was probably the establishment of good diplomatic relations with Britain and eventually Mexico, as China opened itself up for trade somewhat. Lung-di's reforms rooted out corruption as well, and thus, by 1870, China was reforming and strenghthening. It also solidified its control over Korea and Annam.

West of Annam, Indochina was united under the modernizing, westernizing Burmese rule.

Pacific Ocean: Britain during this period took over Australia and New Zeeland; Mexicans begun making inroads into the Pacific Ocean's easternmore islands in the same time. Also, the everpresent French founded a colony in Papua New Guinea, and out of it extended their influence as well.

(In case you weren't paying attention - no mention of Japan yet. That's because it did not open up, but rather got embroiled into a new round of warfare between the isolationists and anti-isolationists, with the former winning thus far)

(Also, I realize I didn't add a whole damn lot of details about China. It would just take too much space, and I think you people understand what is happening with it now: something of a crossbreed between the Meiji Restoration and Peter the Great)
 
World Map 1890:
 
Reserverations:

Conehead234: Germany
North King: Ottoman Empire
Cuivienen: United Kingdom
Alex994: China
Erez: Italy
das: Russia
Azale: Mexico
Thomander: Persia
Kejixu: USA
MjM: Poland
JasonTheKing: New England
Communisto: Canada
Kalthazar: Chile
Dachsmpg: ?
IceEye: ?
Insane_Panda: France (?)
Texas Toast: Hungary
Reno: SDN
Drake Rlugia: Spain
You may now post.
 
Yeah, when I talked to Alex a few days ago, he said he wanted China.

*forgot to add that to reservation list*

Got you down as UK.

Also, das, you have first pick to any nation you want, even if it is reserved. :p
 
I think Ill take Mexico, woooo

btw, question to das or capulet, how strong is Persia and Indochina incase I change my mind...
 
Already said that I'm taking the Russian Republic.
 
Panda, I've reserved France for you. :lol:
 
Note on alliances:
The Tripartite Alliance: France, Spain, Italy (USA is very sympathetic to it)
The British Commonwealth: UK, New England, Canada
The Grand Coalition (former Anti-Russian Coalition of the Russian War): UK, Poland, Ottoman Empire, Persian Empire (Persia is increasingly distancing itself from the Coalition as of late), China

Azale, Persia and Burma are second-rate powers, but both are modernizing and industrializing with British assistance, rather similar to OTL Japan in that regard. Persian power lies more on the land, while Burma is more naval-oriented.
 
Could either the color of the Ottoman Empire or the UK be changed? I can't really tell the difference on the map because of my colorblindness.
 
I'm just going to change the Ottoman's color, since the UK has too many islands to fill in. :p
 
Back
Top Bottom