JosEPh_II
TBS WarLord
If your comment is polemic (meaning not argueing with facts), this may happen quite frequently.
What ways would that be?
I specified my suggestion to -50% for horses attacking cities with palisades and walls.
But generally all cities with positive defense values should have -50% for horses. While a damaged wall of a city that is bombarded down to like 34% may enable foot troops to enter the city more easily, this doesn't allow whole battalions of horses in formation to enter the breaches over meters of rocky rubble.
By the way, do you also disagree over the -50% city attack for tanks?
Don't think so.
The ancient and medieval streets were as narrow for horses as the modern streets are for tanks.
Actually I do for tanks because your view of streets and their widths is distorted. Same as your view over horses. You've restricted it to a specific time frames and world region for every one of your supposed arguments, Medieval Europe. Your view is rather myopic.
Plus why do you continually try to place words in my mouth for me? Don't make suppositions about my positions until you've seen me post it over a specific subject.
JosEPh