Changing Leader Mechanic in Civ 7

[Zaarin]

No, modern gamers are incredibly fat on this idea of production values. They will literally say "it's bad because graphics" or "not worth $x because graphics", explicitly arguing that price is somehow based on (their ignorant prediction of what was) cost or difficulty, and also explicitly saying the gameplay was there and they like it but graphics. They say a price tag is bad (or even morally repugnant) if it seems to them the game was easy to make, without of course having ever made anything themselves.

...Not one part of this strawman makes any sense at all.

 

[aieeegrunt]

...Not one part of this strawman makes any sense at all.

I’m not entirely sure what they were trying to say, but I do think that graphics is one of the major things people judge a video game by, and it can certainly increase or decrease your enjoyment of it.

How important it is or how you like individual “styles” can be just as subjective as anything else

 

[HorseshoeHermit]

...Not one part of this strawman makes any sense at all.

I am referring, obviously, to things I have seen and heard actual people say, as that is obviously the only reason I would be annoyed by it. You saying it doesn't make sense is what doesn't make sense. You got enough sense out of it to claim it's a strawman, which means you know what I asserted and that it was about a position and you can judge if other people have argued that position.

Why, on Earth, would I arrive to the thread with an axe to grind about a set of players that actually does not exist and would never have suggested the problem to my imagination?

 

[Zaarin]

I am referring, obviously, to things I have seen and heard actual people say, as that is obviously the only reason I would be annoyed by it. You saying it doesn't make sense is what doesn't make sense. You got enough sense out of it to claim it's a strawman, which means you know what I asserted and that it was about a position and you can judge if other people have argued that position.

Why, on Earth, would I arrive to the thread with an axe to grind about a set of players that actually does not exist and would never have suggested the problem to my imagination?

I called it a strawman because you seemed to be responding to an imaginary opponent rather than anything anyone said, and I'm genuinely trying to make sense of what you said because it does not add up to a coherent idea.