45°38'N-13°47'E;9152624 said:
Maybe it's my english which isn't very good or maybe it's people keeping on reading what they want... I don't want to take control of another civ; I simply want to change the leader of MY civ. Thanks anyway.
I have anderstand EXACTLY what you ask for, and I belive it would be a great feature.
In civ we (the players) get to control one civilization through several millenium.
With only ONE type of leader !!! this is ridiculous.
A leader would regn at most 60 years on his nation, and the same dynasty, (so we can agree with the same "trait"), for maybe some hundreds of year (china).
In ROM and AND, we got plenty new units, building, ressources . . . maybe too much ?
Those Mod we can't live without it, they are great, and make us look at CIV BTS vanilla as a old and pale game.
The AI has been improve, and the Revolution mod is a blast.
A lot have been done with the civic too, and I think the leader change in game wont be a cheat if it's done with inteligence.
I have allways think that the leader traits and civilisation knowledge at start of the game were stupid.
If you chose a civ with let say fishing, but start inland with not even a lake, how that civ did learn fishing ????
And what about a protective leader, or even an agresive one when you are alone on a island.
At start of game I think we should not have any tech, and no traits either.
We chose what nation we want to lead for the fun of it, after all to start with US in 6000 BC is well funny. . .
And though we advance in time, we discover the tech we need, and the traits we need allso, traits should be able to change, the same way we change civic.
This way the Civilisation and the leader are only names for the fun of it.
Will this be cheating ?