Chaos SG 2 AND Chaos SG 3

Rex Tyrannus said:
"the Spanish would never amount to much!" this is true, but I'm curious to know how you know it. Did you "find" my prank on Isabella or did you open WB? Tentative +1 prank point.
Like I said - in a dream. So, yes I did find your prank.

Rex Tyrannus said:
"our scout found a hidden teleportation device" Not a prank. Just a cheating clever artist.
Never claimed this as a 'find'.

Rex Tyrannus said:
"the creator does in fact love us" No I don't. That was truly a freak of the map script, unless Pholk's been listening to his feminine side again.
How good is that - finding a prank built into the system - bonus points!

Rex Tyrannus said:
Too obvious.
What? So only the not obvious and never found pranks get points - what is this? Discrimination against obvious pranks?

And what about my prank that the prankster couldn't find? And you totally missed the observation about 'always war' v 'always peace'. The only way we can win this game is to distroy all other civs and then vote ourselves the head of the UN! We might need to leave 1 civ city alive so that we have an opponent!
 
ruff_hi said:
And what about my prank that the prankster couldn't find? And you totally missed the observation about 'always war' v 'always peace'. The only way we can win this game is to distroy all other civs and then vote ourselves the head of the UN! We might need to leave 1 civ city alive so that we have an opponent!

lurker's comment:
2 cities. There has to be 3 Civs to have Domination Victory be available.

...dang, I shouldn't have said anything.
 
ChrTh said:
2 cities. There has to be 3 Civs to have Domination Victory be available.
Oh all hail mr pedantic! I suppose that you actually mean at least 1 city for at least 2 different civs, not just 2 cities! Man I am a grump before my morning coffee.

ChrTh said:
...dang, I shouldn't have said anything.
Oyyy - Mr Prankster and your side kick - over heeeerrrrrreeeeee - get'um boys!
 
ruff_hi said:
Oh all hail mr pedantic! I suppose that you actually mean at least 1 city for at least 2 different civs, not just 2 cities!

Well duuuuuuuuuh

Oyyy - Mr Prankster and your side kick - over heeeerrrrrreeeeee - get'um boys!

BRING. IT. ON.
 
Lurkers Comment: Apparently I made a lurkers comment, or so said berserk in another SG, so I just made a comment here to avoid Berserk being a liar.
Also, Berserk said I was on a roster, so can I join? I would like to be an SG breaker with an emphasis on N00Bishness, as my subtitle shows.
So, can I join?
 
ruff_hi said:
Man I am a grump before my morning coffee.
Yeah, addiction sucks :lol:
 
could someone post the rooster i really can't keep track of whats happening.
 
Then the SG is working!
 
ruff_hi said:
Who the @#@ are you to say what is ugly and what is not ugly? Are you a member of the Brotherhood with Equaled And Unequalled Total Yard - I think not. Do you have 37 beautifully rolled and embossed qualification notifications from the Purely Artistic Illuminating Naïf - I think not. You sound as if you are actually a member of Universal Glowing & Leveled Yarns.

All your arguments boil down to mathematics - how ugly is that! We are talking artistic merit here, not flipping screens and double squares - anyone can do that. YOU, on the other hand, are obviously a philistine with not even 1 artistic bone in your body.

Basically, when it comes down to it - I am the measure of what is ugly and what is not AND 81 is ugly.

Every artist needs someone who things he's nuts. :crazyeye: I'd volunteer for the job, but real life is imposing a 2 day exam on me next week, and then I escape to non-internet places. But in the meantime, I'll do what I can. :D (if you get a chance to display your so-call artistic sensibilities again before then)

Edit: the fact that this is my 666th post must mean something... :cringe:
 
If Ruff Hi is the measure of ugly and 81 is ugly then Ruff Hi is therefore 81(a=b=c).
Is this age? IQ? shoe size?
 
That's a poor syllogism right there. A can not equal B b/c there's two different operators in use, and P2 is mere tautology.

Pholkhero: the logician in Chaos :lol:
 
pholkhero said:
That's a poor syllogism right there. A can not equal B b/c there's two different operators in use, and P2 is mere tautology.

Pholkhero: the logician in Chaos :lol:

Then you've acheived pure chaos :wow:
 
ChrTh said:
Then you've acheived pure chaos :wow:
this is pure chaos:

P1: The sky is blue
P2: I like lemons.

Therefore, bulls like potato chips.
 
Or if you prefer the longer version: if a=b and b=c then a=c
 
pholkhero said:
this is pure chaos:

P1: The sky is blue
P2: I like lemons.

Therefore, bulls like potato chips.

Nope. Pure chaos is true order, and vice versa. In a chaotic state, a logician can only be relevant if the state is pure chaos. Therefore, either the chaos is pure, or the logician is irrelevant.

Although based on your last argument, the latter might be more correct at this point :D
 
ChrTh said:
Nope. Pure chaos is true order, and vice versa. In a chaotic state, a logician can only be relevant if the state is pure chaos.
Whoa, like, you've blown my mind, man :smoke:
 
Actually, pure chaos is human nature, so if you're human you're by default chaotic. However in this case, all of you are just nut-cases :p
 
pigswill said:
If Ruff Hi is the measure of ugly and 81 is ugly then Ruff Hi is therefore 81(a=b=c).
Is this age? IQ? shoe size?
Not the 'measure', the 'judge'. I was mis-quoted!
 
Back
Top Bottom