Chineese History

ZultanofZex

Emperor
Joined
Jul 14, 2002
Messages
1,031
Bring it on! I know very little about Chineese history, I am sure alot of you guys out there can teach me a few things.

Please post websites, suggested reading and other goodies here.

I am also very interested in Korean History, especially during the japaneese invasion in the 15 - hundreds. Please include this.

Let the posting begin...
 
China defeated the United Nations in the Korean War. I think Troop numbers were like 563000 to 559000. I duno
 
In what way did the Chinese gain victory in the Korean war?

In a war where the North Korean Army invaded the South, in what way did they succeed in defeating the South. The same of the Chinese, what did they gain from the affaire?

The Chinese took enormous casaulties and risked America taking very serious action in retaliation. It cannot be classed as a Chinese victory...perhaps more a Soviet Victory as Stalin weakened his major enemy, tested much weaponary and best of all brought two of his rivals, China and American into armed conflict.
 
ZultanofZex defenetile wanted to know about Chinas main history not about some littel sparks...

Ok ZultanofZex ..

Chinas histroy is SO OLD that it's unsure when it relay started and what was mythology...

The first Empererors had been god's, and nobody knows when the first "real" state-structures were build.
But is has to be somhoe around 5000 B.C I think...

Then there had been many different Dynasties.. I recommend a book on China in generall...

Some interesting things:
Japan was a derivate of China that seperated and developed a unique even far more complex culture thatn China did.
Once China tried to occupy Japan, but a Tsunami blew away the Chineese Ships. That'S why the Tsunami is that importatn for Japan.

Interesting for Europeans und US the Chineese history became in the 19 century, in the High time of Imperialism.

The British needed tea out of India. To get money for they tea they sold opium to China, to get back gold.
So many Chineese bought opium that much gold flew out of China to the British.

The Chineese economy went donw, simply becuase the prices got higher and higher bvecuase the gold wasn't in china anymore.

So China say: Stop! And trhew the British out.. At least they tried..
British - militaric far superior of course - simply knocked them out and forced many trading treaty signed by China. Of course these treaties were only advantagous for Britian, not for China...

In Addition many other nation tired to get a part of the Chineese wealth.. US, France, German Empire, even Austria-Hungary (didn't had colonies in oppoite to the other mighty nations) forced their own treaties out of China...

And in the End of the 19th centurey even Japan jopined them bey burning China out...

The Mandchurian Emperors had been only a tool of the Western Nations in the end, and many Chineese (who considered the Mandshurians as barbarians anyway) began to revolt...

In the year 1900 then there had been the "Boxer-Uprising" (At least in German we name it this way) where mayn Chineese began to go violently against the foregners who let CHina to go down...

TO make a conclusion: China was never strong enough, and it was WW1 who forced the European to leave China, simpyl becuase they had more problems elsewere...

Then in the time beween the wars the Chineese under Kai-Shek changed the Empire to a "Republik", and the Empire didn't had any might anymore...

Then There was the struggle between the Coommunists and the Republicans, not to forget tjhe japaneese invasion..

The State "Mandchucko" the Japaneese created was ruled (official only) by the former last Emperor of China.

Then the Communists could take over pwer in China, and the Republicans fleed to Tawian, where they are even today.


OK, I gave you now a very very very quick overview with special attention on the 19th century, but I recommend som books on thes topic!

THe history of CHina is realy interesting!

And if you have specific question, I will try to answer them!
 
Originally posted by pi8ch
The first Empererors had been god's, and nobody knows when the first "real" state-structures were build.
But is has to be somhoe around 5000 B.C I think...
Compared with the Egyptians, the Indians and the Mesopotamians, the Chinese got started somewhat later... The earliest verifiable state was that of the Shang (about 16th to 11th century BC).

But when we finally got started... :)

Japan was a derivate of China that seperated and developed a unique even far more complex culture thatn China did.
Japan is hardly a derivative of China; sure there was a strong Chinese influence on Heian Japan via Korea, but there was nothing in Chinese culture to account for the militaristic tendencies of Japan (think samurai, bushido and hara-kiri here).

Much of Japan's culture is unique and home-grown, or grown out of foreign imports.

Once China tried to occupy Japan, but a Tsunami blew away the Chineese Ships. That'S why the Tsunami is that importatn for Japan.
It was the Mongols under Khubilai; the Chinese never once bothered with Japan, except when the Japanese tried to invade Korea three times in history. And when waku pirates based in Japan threatened the Chinese coastline.

The British needed tea out of India. To get money for they tea they sold opium to China, to get back gold.
So many Chineese bought opium that much gold flew out of China to the British.
The Brits wanted tea fr China, not India. And they had nothing to sell to the Chinese, except Indian opium.

The Chineese economy went donw, simply becuase the prices got higher and higher bvecuase the gold wasn't in china anymore.
The Chinese standard of exchange was based on the silver...

So China say: Stop! And trhew the British out.. At least they tried..
British - militaric far superior of course - simply knocked them out and forced many trading treaty signed by China. Of course these treaties were only advantagous for Britian, not for China...
The Chinese tried to put an end to the drugs being imported into China and created a class of addicts. The Brits, in the name of free trade, responded with landing an army, along with the French...

Trying to sell to the customers at gunpoint...

It wasn't so much an European victory, as a breakdown of Manchu control over its territories within its Chinese domains, and also the loss of effectiveness of the once much-vaunted Banners... Most of the local Chinese just let the Europeans passed unmolested thru its areas...

Try doing that today, with a China briddled with nationalism and patriotism...

The Mandchurian Emperors had been only a tool of the Western Nations in the end, and many Chineese (who considered the Mandshurians as barbarians anyway) began to revolt...

In the year 1900 then there had been the "Boxer-Uprising" (At least in German we name it this way) where mayn Chineese began to go violently against the foregners who let CHina to go down...
The Manchus under the Dowager Empress collaborated with the Boxers... Imperial troops worked in hand with the Boxers.

TO make a conclusion: China was never strong enough, and it was WW1 who forced the European to leave China, simpyl becuase they had more problems elsewere...
Not WW1; the Europeans hanged on until the Japanese began kicking them out... Came back for awhile before the Communists kicked them out for good in 1949.

Then in the time beween the wars the Chineese under Kai-Shek changed the Empire to a "Republik", and the Empire didn't had any might anymore...
Chiang Kaishek only controlled the KMT in the mid 20s. Yuan Shikai and the warlords were still calling the shots in 1911...

Then There was the struggle between the Coommunists and the Republicans, not to forget tjhe japaneese invasion..
Not 'Republicans', the Nationalists (the Guomindang actually...)...
 
Originally posted by kittenOFchaos
In what way did the Chinese gain victory in the Korean war?
In the way of achieving the Chinese objective of the war - which was to keep the US away fr the Yalu, and from peeking into Chinese-held Manchuria.

The Chinese Communists had many reasons to suspect US intentions, considering the US were very supportive of the KMT during the Chinese civil war, which ended barely 1 year before the first shots of the Korean war.

In a war where the North Korean Army invaded the South, in what way did they succeed in defeating the South. The same of the Chinese, what did they gain from the affaire?
The Chinese don't give a damn about reuniting Korea - they probably prefer a weakened, disunited one...

They only wanted to keep a US army away fr Manchuria - they believed the Americans would probably invade Manchuria as well, to help the KMT, who had just been defeated 1-2 years before on the mainland. Better to fight in Korea, than on Chinese territory...

The Chinese took enormous casaulties and risked America taking very serious action in retaliation. It cannot be classed as a Chinese victory...perhaps more a Soviet Victory as Stalin weakened his major enemy, tested much weaponary and best of all brought two of his rivals, China and American into armed conflict.
The Chinese Communists were desperate, and the Americans didn't even want to talk to them... They couldn't sound them out on their intentions at all.

Had the Americans being willing to talk, it would be like Nixon entente, except it took place 2 decades earlier. The Chinese Communists didn't get along with the Soviets very well; even during the Chinese civil war, Stalin preferred to support the KMT, over them...

The KMT had a very long tradition of cooperating with the Soviets. Chiang Kaishek himself was originally trained in the Soviet Union. ;)
 
Originally posted by kittenOFchaos
The Chinese took enormous casaulties and risked America taking very serious action in retaliation.
Most of the casualties were from frostbite, and inadequate weatherwear, rather than fr US action. :p

In 1950, the West didn't think too highly of the average Chinese soldier - after all, China had been under the foot of the Western powers for a century. European gunboats roamed at will along the Yangzi. And the Chinese didn't do well militarily, vs the Japanese, during the war.

The picture they had of Chinese soldiers were conscripted peasants armed with whatever on-hand (even rusted swords and spears), and had to be roped and forced to the battlefield, as was typical of warlord troops of the 20s (many were later enrolled into the KMT forces).

They never realised that the average Chinese soldier in the Communist-led forces was of a new breed; particularly now that the Chinese soldiers were motivated to fight for China, rather than warlords and the KMT. They had a purpose now.

Furthermore, all the forces the Chinese had were of rifle infantry, armed mostly with leftovers fr Japanese arms surrendered during the war, and US arms sent to the KMT during the civil war (and surrendered when KMT forces surrendered). The heaviest arms they had were mortars... To be able to drive the Americans and UN forces back across the border was quite an achievement, under such circumstances...

It was only during the 2nd phase of the war, with Chinese and remnant NK forces dug in along the border, that the Soviets began supplying better arms to the Chinese. And on loan; the Chinese had to pay every cent for them. :rolleyes:

Had the Americans simply be willing to talk to the Communist Chinese in 1950, the entire Chinese entry into the Korean war would have been avoided totally, and today we wouldn't need to worry about a nuclear-armed NK...
 
Knight-Dragon

thanks about this closer looks!

Are you chineese? (You sometimes used "we" whe nspeaking of China)
 
Originally posted by Knight-Dragon
Compared with the Egyptians, the Indians and the Mesopotamians, the Chinese got started somewhat later... The earliest verifiable state was that of the Shang (about 16th to 11th century BC).

But when we finally got started... :)


You didn't stop going along the way.

Japan is hardly a derivative of China; sure there was a strong Chinese influence on Heian Japan via Korea, but there was nothing in Chinese culture to account for the militaristic tendencies of Japan (think samurai, bushido and hara-kiri here).

Seppuku actually, hara-kiri is, IIRC, a chinesse reading of the kanji, but the actual japanesse reading is seppuku. ;-)

Then again, given that one of the primordial book among those japan militarist was a certain "Art of War" written in China, I don't know just how much the Chinesse can claim to have *not* influenced the militaristic bend in Japan.

And for that matter, the Chinesse were hardly pacifistic...we'Re still talking the nation that conquered Vietnam circa 100 BC and Korea at roughly the same period...;-)

Much of Japan's culture is unique and home-grown, or grown out of foreign imports.

Indeed, though IIRC the primary origin is altaic, much as with Korea (but no, it is *NOT* of primary Korean origin. To say that the two share a common primary origin is exact, but to say that one find its origin in the other is nationalist drivel).

It was the Mongols under Khubilai; the Chinese never once bothered with Japan, except when the Japanese tried to invade Korea three times in history.

Try 1, China wins. Try 2, Hideyoshi dies and the troop get told to withdraw (after beign defeated by the famous Turtle Ships). Try 3, Japan beat the stuffing out of China (1895 war).

You have to admire those Japanesse for their persistance, if nothing else.

And when waku pirates based in Japan threatened the Chinese coastline.

Though the "bothering" at that point was more in the nature of "No more trade for you, Japan!", until you do as we say!

IIRC, early on China actually had Japan as one of its major tributary state. They weren't too happy with the fact that the Japanesse leader wasn't properly meek and insisted on considering himself an emperor and THE Son of Heaven.

Of course, when Japan stopped paying, China didn't exactly bother to go oversea to exact vengeance.

The Brits wanted tea fr China, not India. And they had nothing to sell to the Chinese, except Indian opium.

And even if they had had something, they couldn't exactly make decent trade through the Canton system. China, though it was its right to refuse to trade, wasn't exactly open to any trade-related notion.

The Chinese tried to put an end to the drugs being imported into China and created a class of addicts. The Brits, in the name of free trade, responded with landing an army, along with the French...

Technically, they responded to the destruction of british property by burning and dumping in the harbor.

Of course, said property was opium...;-)

Trying to sell to the customers at gunpoint...

It wasn't so much an European victory, as a breakdown of Manchu control over its territories within its Chinese domains, and also the loss of effectiveness of the once much-vaunted Banners... Most of the local Chinese just let the Europeans passed unmolested thru its areas...


Most Chinesse probably saw it as "These strangers, or the strangers in the imperial palace? Who cares..."

Try doing that today, with a China briddled with nationalism and patriotism...

And say hello to Armageddon.

The Manchus under the Dowager Empress collaborated with the Boxers... Imperial troops worked in hand with the Boxers.

True. Initialy, the boxers had been anti-Manchus, but the DE and her loyal cohorts (who had already ruined an attempt at Japanesse-style modernization in 98) manipulated them into turning their hatred on the evil Westerners.

Not WW1; the Europeans hanged on until the Japanese began kicking them out...

Yes, but they sort of lost much of their hold with the war. They just didn't have the force or political clout to both occupy germany and keep a strong check on China and their colony...

Which opened the door wide for Japan to move in and garner power and influence.

Chiang Kaishek only controlled the KMT in the mid 20s. Yuan Shikai and the warlords were still calling the shots in 1911...

Yuan Shikai specificaly, as he was chief of state circa then. Then he died and came the warlord era, and then came Chiang on the one hand with his white terror, and Mao on the other with his communist guerilla.

Simplified, of course.
 
It seems that we have sevral academical interpretation "fights" here ;)


In the end we all mean the same: Chineese culture and history is just gigantic! In quantity as wel as in quality!

I'm a big fan of the far-East.
 
Originally posted by pi8ch
Knight-Dragon

thanks about this closer looks!

Are you chineese? (You sometimes used "we" whe nspeaking of China)
Yep, pure Chinese, but of the overseas variety. Malaysian actually. ;)
 
Originally posted by Oda Nobunaga
Seppuku actually, hara-kiri is, IIRC, a chinesse reading of the kanji, but the actual japanesse reading is seppuku. ;-)

Then again, given that one of the primordial book among those japan militarist was a certain "Art of War" written in China, I don't know just how much the Chinesse can claim to have *not* influenced the militaristic bend in Japan.

And for that matter, the Chinesse were hardly pacifistic...we'Re still talking the nation that conquered Vietnam circa 100 BC and Korea at roughly the same period...;-)
I will admit the Chinese were hardly the pacific type, esp where certain emperors were concerned. Some of China's earliest wars made the European wars up till the Napoleonic period looking like a walk in the garden. The Chinese were the first to execute the concept known as the total mobilization of the population for war.

But the Chinese, as individuals and families, don't like war, or soldiers, or armies; unlike the West. There's a very ancient Chinese saying that like good iron don't make weopans, so good sons don't make soldiers.

When Singapore began conscription service of all its male citizens back in the 60s, the govt encountered real problems in getting the Singaporean Chinese to fall into line. I believe it's a common Chinese attitude everywhere.

At certain times in Chinese history (the Song e.g.), the imperial govt had to man its armies with the likes of vagrants, convicts and the like. One big reason why the Chinese were militarily weak against the nomads of the north, at times.

Try 1, China wins. Try 2, Hideyoshi dies and the troop get told to withdraw (after beign defeated by the famous Turtle Ships). Try 3, Japan beat the stuffing out of China (1895 war).

You have to admire those Japanesse for their persistance, if nothing else.
An interesting note - most of the samurai in the Hideyoshi Korean campaign were Christians - or at least the leaders were. The campaign was a bit more complicated than that. The Japanese were initially successful; with them armed with the best muskets in the world at this time (self-designed, fr Portuegese and Dutch imports). They even took Pyongyang.

However, the Koreans put up a fearsome resistance; with scorched earth tactics. Then the Ming Liaodong army arrived; there're some battles and the Japanese retreated south to regroup in a couple of armed camps along the coast. By then, the Korean navy had seized control of the seas, thru brilliant tactics and the armored ships.

Hideyoshi was adamant to continue and threatened to punish the leaders of the campaign. Fortunately he died; then the Japanese managed to work out a peace treaty, and returned to Japan.

There won't be a 4th time... :p

IIRC, early on China actually had Japan as one of its major tributary state. They weren't too happy with the fact that the Japanesse leader wasn't properly meek and insisted on considering himself an emperor and THE Son of Heaven.

Of course, when Japan stopped paying, China didn't exactly bother to go oversea to exact vengeance.
Japan was never really an important tributary state for China; that role was filled by Korea. A Korea allied with the nomads along the northern frontier would be catastrophic for the Chinese. The Chinese imperial govt would usually try to cultivate the Koreans at mostimes, esp when a pro-Chinese ruling house was in place.

And even if they had had something, they couldn't exactly make decent trade through the Canton system. China, though it was its right to refuse to trade, wasn't exactly open to any trade-related notion.
The Confucianists believe trade is a necessary evil. Not something to encourage overly. And they're the ones ruling the country.

Like Microsoft e.g. :)
 
What i think too is that the japaneese culture is far more warrior-based than the Chineese.

Not to forget that the salesmen in China were far more respected thatn in Japan where it was considered not very honourable to deal with money.
 
Back
Top Bottom