Civ3 has 2 major disadvantages:
1) It's much harder to "control the game" (moving the cursor, clicking on the ground, entering a city etc.) than in civ2.
2)There's only 1 mode of play: "Start a new game" in which the player must always start from the beginning and play a long tiring game. There aren't even scenarios!
In civ2 there are lots of plat mods: start new game, scenario (ww1, ww2, napoleon, rome...)-- faster games for those who don't want to start from the beginning. There are also many mod packs which make new units, cities etc. (you can even play with dinosaurs and aliens).
And you can create your own scenarios!!!
civ3 is for only 1 sort of players. civ2 is for everyone who likes strategy (and that's why civ2 is played until today even after civ3 came out).
1) It's much harder to "control the game" (moving the cursor, clicking on the ground, entering a city etc.) than in civ2.
2)There's only 1 mode of play: "Start a new game" in which the player must always start from the beginning and play a long tiring game. There aren't even scenarios!
In civ2 there are lots of plat mods: start new game, scenario (ww1, ww2, napoleon, rome...)-- faster games for those who don't want to start from the beginning. There are also many mod packs which make new units, cities etc. (you can even play with dinosaurs and aliens).
And you can create your own scenarios!!!
civ3 is for only 1 sort of players. civ2 is for everyone who likes strategy (and that's why civ2 is played until today even after civ3 came out).