anonxanemone
Warlord
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2020
- Messages
- 297
To be fair, fitting to the historical theme, portraits that emphasized realism were a relatively new invention, right? Old paintings of historical figures aren't that realistic a lot times.
I actually wish Firaxis had gone even further in this direction and made the leaders living, breathing, three-dimensional versions of their historical depictions, almost like caricatures. I know this would have only made their designs more controversial, but personally I think it would have been a lot of fun, especially in the setting of a game that usually doesn't prioritise realism or accuracy.To be fair, fitting to the historical theme, portraits that emphasized realism were a relatively new invention, right? Old paintings of historical figures aren't that realistic a lot times.
I'd say it's the other way around. While a certain amount of flattery was involved in painting royal portraits, they can be surprisingly honest--just go look for any painting of a Habsburg. That was not flattering.To be fair, fitting to the historical theme, portraits that emphasized realism were a relatively new invention, right? Old paintings of historical figures aren't that realistic a lot times.
just go look for any painting of a Habsburg.
"Forgive me, my lady, did my chin just put out your eye while we were dancing?"I like to imagine portraits of Habsburgs are the flattering paintings![]()
Maybe the criteria is Havana and Manila were actually colonial cities founded by the Spanish Empire unlike Brussels and Lisbon.All those cities belonged to the Spanish Empire at the time ... I just say why Havana & Manila are in the list and the others not ... what's the criteria?
And that's odd that Spain is the only one case (for "modern countries" obviously) which city list includes cities that do no belong to the country nowadays ... there is not Victoria's Hong Kong nor Trajan's Jerusalem
I'm no artist, from my perspective I'd say it's more difficult to find (new) source for units with the same artstyle compared to civ4-civ5. It would be easier to replace the vanilla units to have a coherent line-up.I would like to ask the modders out there if the art style of Civ VI has made it easier for you to make custom leaders, districts, units, buildings etc compared to previous civ games?
I feel like it is.
I actually wish Firaxis had gone even further in this direction and made the leaders living, breathing, three-dimensional versions of their historical depictions, almost like caricatures. I know this would have only made their designs more controversial, but personally I think it would have been a lot of fun, especially in the setting of a game that usually doesn't prioritise realism or accuracy.
3D models is the last thing we need IMHO. CK3 added that and all it does is make my graphics card work hard (both fans spinning) and for what?