smackster
SGOTM
Ainwood,
This is a truly great tool. So far I've spent most of my time looking at the corruption tab as that is telling me more info than I've ever seen before.
What is alarming to me is that in looking back at a good cross section of my games from the last 6 months is that in all cases and at all ages I would have been better off in Monarchy instead of Republic. Even if you take away unit support, the corruption difference between Monarchy and Republic does not outweigh the threat of WW. Add to that MP's from Monarchy.
For example from my GOTM30 (space ship victory), 760ad Republic 467 beakers, 155 corruption, Monarchy 459 beakers, 163 corruption. Just 8 beakers difference in corruption. These values are before any unit/building maintenance.
For example from my COTM2 (dom win), 690ad, Republic 323 beakers, 328 corruption, Monarchy 310 beakers, 341 corruption
Am I missing something? What have I forgotten about Republic that makes it worth switching to over Monarchy?
smackster
This is a truly great tool. So far I've spent most of my time looking at the corruption tab as that is telling me more info than I've ever seen before.
What is alarming to me is that in looking back at a good cross section of my games from the last 6 months is that in all cases and at all ages I would have been better off in Monarchy instead of Republic. Even if you take away unit support, the corruption difference between Monarchy and Republic does not outweigh the threat of WW. Add to that MP's from Monarchy.
For example from my GOTM30 (space ship victory), 760ad Republic 467 beakers, 155 corruption, Monarchy 459 beakers, 163 corruption. Just 8 beakers difference in corruption. These values are before any unit/building maintenance.
For example from my COTM2 (dom win), 690ad, Republic 323 beakers, 328 corruption, Monarchy 310 beakers, 341 corruption
Am I missing something? What have I forgotten about Republic that makes it worth switching to over Monarchy?
smackster