arcane assasin
Chieftain
I recently started playing Civ4, and I find it very enjoyable, strategically challenging, and historically deep in scope. But one thing that I immediately noticed in the choice of leaders was the absence of Adolf Hitler as a choice for Germany.
Now I am definately no fan of Hitler, but I wondered why he had been left out. If it was because he was considered not important enough, then that may be understandable, but I find it hard to agree that Hitler was any less influential in the 20th century than Winston Churchill, in fact without Hitler, Churchill may have been just a footnote.
Now if Hitler was left out because of the atrocities that he committed, again this may be understandable, except for the fact that there are other leaders included in the game who have committed equally horrible acts, or worse. (Unless I'm wrong, Genghis Khan did not conquer most of Asia by riding across the land handing out flowers and candy.) And if his atrocities were considered to fresh on human history, then I would find that hard to explain to someone playing this game today in Russia, who's grandparents or great grandparents may have been murdered by Joseph Stalin.
The point is that, yes, Hitler's holocaust was a horrible crime against humanity, but the fact that it did happen only shows that it is a reality one must face in the coarse of human history, which is what this game is about. I for one would rather see a game as acclaimed as Sid Meier's Civilization be more historically correct, than politically correct.
Now I am definately no fan of Hitler, but I wondered why he had been left out. If it was because he was considered not important enough, then that may be understandable, but I find it hard to agree that Hitler was any less influential in the 20th century than Winston Churchill, in fact without Hitler, Churchill may have been just a footnote.
Now if Hitler was left out because of the atrocities that he committed, again this may be understandable, except for the fact that there are other leaders included in the game who have committed equally horrible acts, or worse. (Unless I'm wrong, Genghis Khan did not conquer most of Asia by riding across the land handing out flowers and candy.) And if his atrocities were considered to fresh on human history, then I would find that hard to explain to someone playing this game today in Russia, who's grandparents or great grandparents may have been murdered by Joseph Stalin.
The point is that, yes, Hitler's holocaust was a horrible crime against humanity, but the fact that it did happen only shows that it is a reality one must face in the coarse of human history, which is what this game is about. I for one would rather see a game as acclaimed as Sid Meier's Civilization be more historically correct, than politically correct.