Civs that should be in an expansion

[Mirc]

I mostly included the civs from Civ3PTW and C3C. But the last ones are new .

What do you think?
This is a multi-choice poll.
BTW, the civs are in alphabetical order.

HOPE IT'S GOING TO BE A NICE THREAD!!!

 

[XGustaX]

Yeah I would also like to see Argentina, they were for a long period in time the second richest country in the world even richer then the U.S. Maybe they could have Eva Peron or John(Juan) Peron, Nicolas Avellaneda?

Portual should also be added. Brazil? could also work. Also add a new description like Immigration or something and Argentina Brazil and the US should be pros at that. They should also add more leaders to nations that only have one leader and like you said add the civs from civ 3.

 

[秦始皇]

I agree with you , now there is few leaders in the game .

 

[Adam7Eight]

Vikings, Dutch, Turks, and Ethiopia should definately be in.

 

[Mirc]

Welcome to CFC, XGustaX!

I would also like more civs from South-America .

 

[Zany]

No Poles? No Israel? No Assyria? No Austria? And the EU option should not be included. Ask a moderator to update the poll.

But I think Babylon, Carthage, Celts, Dutch, Ottomans, Sumeria, and Ethiopia should be included for sure in the first XP.

 

[秦始皇]

more civilization more leaders more charactors

 

[Mercade]

Yeah I would also like to see Argentina, they were for a long period in time the second richest country in the world even richer then the U.S. Maybe they could have Eva Peron or John(Juan) Peron, Nicolas Avellaneda?

Portual should also be added. Brazil? could also work. Also add a new description like Immigration or something and Argentina Brazil and the US should be pros at that. They should also add more leaders to nations that only have one leader and like you said add the civs from civ 3.

Welcome to CivFanatics, XGustaX.

Argentina is a very interesting suggestion. You're quite right about the economic fortunes of Argentina in the 19th century.

 

[Mrdie]

First Pirority: Babylon

Second Pirority: Korea

Third Pirority: Turks

Somewhere in the piroritys: Sweden

(Just my opinion, but I would like to see Sweden)

 

[Venger]

The Brazlian unique unit could be the beggar orphan... yikes.

The new world is too new to have much inclusion - the United States makes it simply because of it's overwhelming modern dominance.

The only one I voted for that doesn't appear to be getting traction is the Zulu, and that's honestly just Civ nostalgia behind my wanting them...

The one that I always underestimate are the Dutch. I guess it's their relatively small role in the modern world. Hey, I gotta hat tip Denmark though for stepping up in Iraq, bonus points for them there... in fact, that's convinced me, gimme the King of Denmark...

Babylonians seem a shoo-in, and should be. Same for the Ottomans and Vikings. I wouldn't mind seeing a Native American tribe entered (though hard to argue for a culture that couldn't invent the bloody wheel). Gotta thumbs down the Portuguese, they seem like Spain-lite (though more Iraq props).

Venger

 

[AceChilla]

I would like to see the Dutch in any case. But Im quite charmed by the EU option too. Would be fun playing the EU.

Of the other Babylon, Byzantines, Israel and the Ottomans. Altough the vikings where charming little fellows I dont see what they contributed qua "Civilization" to the world except for cool ships and clubbing peoples heads in

 

[Schben]

Babylon, Maya, Korea, Turks, Zulu or Abyssinia, Carthage, and more leaders for the existing civs!

Altough the vikings where charming little fellows I dont see what they contributed qua "Civilization" to the world except for cool ships and clubbing peoples heads in

I agree completely!

 

[Roland Ehnström]

Anyone else got a deja-vu feeling over this thread?

-- Roland

 

[Red Door]

Yeah I've definetly seen something just like it.

 

[Roland Ehnström]

Yeah, let's see, we have this thread, started TODAY actually: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=140204

And this nearly identical poll:

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=131326

-- Roland

 

[Roland Ehnström]

And, once again, then: A Viking is a warrior going berserk. The civ would be called Scandinavia.

There is no such thing as "a viking civilization". It would be like saying "a warrior civilization". There was however an "age of vikings" in the history of Scandinavia. In civ terms, the Viking would be the Unique Unit of Scandinavia.

-- Roland

 

[Venger]

Yeah, but everyone recognizes them as the Vikings. They have a football team and everything!

Erik the Red, Leif, would be obvious leaders. I bet they are in...

Venger

 

[Truronian]

I think some more modern civs would be nice, especially given the lean towards modern times in the turns. Maybe Australia, Canada or Brazil. Indonesia also sound interesting.

Israel would be a nice addition, given its impact on world history (in one form or another).

 

[KingKHAN]

Babylonians, Carthagians, Vikings, Mexico

 

[KingKHAN]

Israel would be a nice addition, given its impact on world history (in one form or another).

Being enslaved time after time?