Combat odds cheats

[Farm Boy]

I have tested it. Others have tested it. Stack attack stinks. Checked it once, unchecked it for every other game for 4 years.

its why i stated in my original post that this is just a vent of frustration.. i know zero can come from this thread... i know what i know and i know it to be true... others will agree, disagree, or not be informed enough to have a valid opinion.. knowing what i know about the world most fit into the 'not be informed enough to ahve a valid opinion'... as you can see most are basically saying ' i read another post by a guy who said he tested it and its not cheating... so thats why i believe its not cheating'... these people dont know a thing.. they just read something and believe it.. they didnt test it... i did.. i know its cheating..

The OP has stated pretty clearly that his mind is made up and he does not want to be confused with the facts.

Move along people, nothing to see here.

 

[Lemon Merchant]

azzman333 if you didnt lose a single battle 95% plus... you dont remember well, you are lying, or you played a fast duel game. Statistically you ARE going to lose some 95% combat in any decently large game. Your last post is enough proof to me you dont know what you are talking about.. if you dont understand that in a game where hundreds of combats are going on that you will HAVE to lose some 95% battles... sigh...

Due to the actual operation of an RNG, which in a computer is, at best, pseudo random. The odds of winning at 95% also mean that you have just as good odds to lose over the long term. You could pull 15 legitimate losses out of 20 attacks at 5%. It's probably happened to more people here than I can count.

The problem is selective memory. The computer doesn't cheat, the RNG (like all RNG's in a computer) is flawed.

In any case, I would agree with azzaman's assessment, given his credentials and long standing membership in the CFC community.

Now, you're ranting and making a fool out of yourself with this flamefest.

 

[ori]

Moderator Action: This thread never had a chance to engender true discussion - so its misplaced on a discussion board. Closed.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889