Creation vs Evolution

Status
Not open for further replies.
WOW over 400 posts and still drivellin'!

at F.A.L.- The great jelly doughnut of course rules the universe. A doughnut that big could not have been made by a baker, it had to be self-creating. If you understand that a jelly doughnut can create itself, and be that large, then you see that it logically follows (pay attention here: ) that jelly doughnut rules. I've proven it so many times, silly. GO back and look at my posts. The great jelly doughnut rules, and those who believe in some thing else are sorely decieved and not using their powers of perception and logic. And it makes me angry that billions of dollars are devoted to scientific and educational institutions that completely ignore the great jelly doughnut or actually LOOK DOWN THEIR NOSES at the great jelly doughnut. If the great jelly doughnut didn't exist (which, by the way, the fact that you don't see it in the night sky proves that it does), the snobbery of those who oppose the jelly doughnut would still be enough to convince me to promote jelly doughnutational studies...

END THIS THREAD!
 
Yeah, This is post # 402.

Should we report this to a moderator, or see if it can actually get to 500?
 
Go ahead, click on report this post to a moderator and write in "thread at 400 plus posts"... I am not going to bother those guys- every time I report something I end up getting banned! (just kidding)
 
Originally posted by Perfection
I like lemon bismarks, do they count as Jelly Donuts?

And yes it should be spelled D-O-N-U-T.

The first schism.

Some of us are properly worshipping the doughnut. While others seem to think they can "slack" thru life worshipping something they call a "Donut". Nice try perfection. This is facetious. It is the Great Jelly Doughnut. If you need proof, look at the previous posts.
 
I will not tolerate reforms in the worship of the Great Jelly Donut. All who do not worship the rightful Jelly Donut will be hunted down and destroyed(sound familiar to the witch hunts Christians?).
 
I reject you heretics from straying from the words of the Great Jelly Donut. You will be condemmed to the land of the rotten bearclaws for your sacreligius acts. You do not want to incur the wrath of the Great Jelly Donut.
 
You know , protein, nucleic acid, ect... are matter and not so simple. Matter are condensate energy ( E= mc2 ).

So in the begining only pure energy it was, as it cool down it begin to " solidify" into atom like hydrogen. Later on star are born from hydrogen gas and create a more condensate form of matter, heavier atom like carbon,iron,nitrogen ect...

Those giant star explode and dissiminate "dust", and we are born from those dust, or i would say we are condensate form of pur energy, which are able to self observe the univers from which we are born.

So it is not simple matter when we talk about atom, but condensated energy who try to understand its own existance by creating organo-complex-carbon base lifeform.

The chemistry of lifeform is well behind our total comprehension and what happen here on earth, have certainly appear elswhere many time.

Creation ? Evolution ? i would say both.
 
And the existance of the Catholic God is illogical.

They said God is is infinite powerfull.

They said god is all love.


So why do we live in a crappy world like that, where we have to kill living form to eat and even kill ourself.

If god was realy love and power he wouldnt have created the world like the one we live into.
 
Sorry to ignore your fine points, Tassadar, but in case you didn't notice a much more important theological debate is raging here.

Perfection claims that there is a Great Jelly "Donut" with the power to send us to the land of bear claws. This is the kind of fuzzy logic that led to the original "kruller contraversy". I have to ask you to support your position Perfection if you are going to go on like that. I don't want quotes, I want links. And not biased "scientific" or "university" sources. You have to prove your point by linking to something that I wrote. Not an easy task. Might as well admit that by taking the "ugh" out of Doughnut, you have turned a beautiful vision of a mighty deity into something shallow and tawdry.

Repent sinner, or you will be dipped in the lake of coffee.
 
Oh yeah, well show me some proof of The Great Jelly DoUGHnut

and no you can't use doughnutorigions.com because they are baised twords the infidel Ughists
 
Well if you read my previous posts you would have all the proof you need. But here I will try again to get this through to you:

In a Universe as big as ours, statistically you would think that aliens who enjoy granola for breakfast would have made contact with us already. But they haven't. That means that there must be some force tilting our breakfasts towards the powdered sugary, the jelly filled, in short, this universe is controlled by the great jelly DoUGHnut. Don't make me get into the microbiology.
 
LINKS, SHOW ME THE LINKS

And Anyways we've allready contacted aliens who enjoy granola, where do you think granola comes from? And the great Jelly Donut isn't powdered its glazed!!
 
Originally posted by Perfection
LINKS, SHOW ME THE LINKS

And Anyways we've allready contacted aliens who enjoy granola, where do you think granola comes from? And the great Jelly Donut isn't powdered its glazed!!

AAAAAGGGGHHHHH I tore my eyes out when I read that. Glazed?! I ought to report you to a moderator you troll! Glazed? Do you know how insulting that is to people who take this seriously and aren't just going on about "Donuts"?

It is a powdered jelly donut and the filling is grape. You want a link, fine:

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/1996/41567.html

There is no way that would have been possible is in a "glazed" universe. Frankly, I'm going to put you on my ignore list if you go on this way.
 
That link is fake because The great jelly Donut can have nothing to do with wussy Softball players, and it must be glazed, because thats what happens to your eyes when your chemistry teacher tries to explain Lewis Structures
 
Oh my Donut!! What has happened to this thread? :ack: A tawdry debate over religious minutiae, fundamentalist narrowmindedness, and possibly even biased science! How far this thread has fal-- oops, hold on a second... :hmm:

Edit: tsk Perfection, we did Lewis last year :p Much fun, eh? Just wait to you get to complexes and carbon compounds. Say 2,3-diethyl-4,5,5,7-tetraisopropyl-10-tetbutyl-dodecane three times fast! Now diagrams! :lol:

edit 2: Joking aside, I think we're ready for the creationists to bring forth their argument, if they have one. The last 20 pages have mostly been on evolution's side of the field with me taking a few snide shots at the Ark, Eden, the Red Sea, and so on. But we haven't heard a real creationist argument yet...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom