Creative Chaos

[DinoDoc]

Show me the specific statutory provisions that are being violated by Obama. Without the actual statutory language, the is reliance on well known blowhards that have a track record of being wrong.

Show me the legal justification for the repeated Employer Mandate delays or his fix to people getting policies canceled due to the law's provisions.

 

[JollyRoger]

You need to provide me with the statute on these items - since you are the one making the claim that he is violating the statute, I'm sure you have read the language. I am asking that you share with the class so that your claim can be verified.

The actual statutory language is important to know how much discretion the executive branch has.

 

[DinoDoc]

The text of the law itself describes an “applicable large employer” as follows: “The term ‘applicable large employer’ means, with respect to a calendar year, an employer who employed an average of at least 50 full-time employees on business days during the preceding calendar year.”

The final words in the section of PPACA mandating that employers with more than 50 full-time employees provide their employees with “minimum essential coverage” imposes a specific statutory deadline for doing so. It says: “EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to months beginning after December 31, 2013.”

- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ter...lates-plain-language-law#sthash.gr5q3LYm.dpuf

In a legal context, shall is an imperative command yes? What circumstances would allow this to be a special case?

 

[JollyRoger]

- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/ter...lates-plain-language-law#sthash.gr5q3LYm.dpuf

In a legal context, shall is an imperative command yes? What circumstances would allow this to be a special case?

http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=13064836&postcount=29