Exp
- Double Speed: Settlers
no this is to powerfull, +50% is max, otherwise this traits means 'your first build must be a settler'
I'm not sure I agree with this, because the production bonus only applies to hammers, not to food. If you build a settler straight away, then only 1, maybe 2 hammers will get the multiplier. I think you would be better off improving tiles first - such as mines - and then building a string of settlers, each very quickly because of more hammers being multiplied.
- +2per city
instead of +2H a +1 food on city tile (to get 3F in most cases) could represent the 'expandability' (in the early game I often hesitate to build a city because it wont grow)
Interesting idea, but beyond the scope of xml methinks. A similar idea - which is possible - is to grant a +1


Fin
- +15%per city
- Double Speed: Market, Grocer, Bank, Harbour, Customs House
Such a trait sucks ^^ and the +15% would be indexed upon the tax slider. (its stronger if you get 100% tax than if you get only 10% tax).
I'm not sure that it doth suck. It might be weak - it's certainly weaker than the classic Financial - but it does have significant strengths in rapidly building up your economic infrastructure. True, it does depend mainly on how much you put into the tax slider, and that was what I was going for. Previously Financial was more powerful in terms of being a scientific trait than a money-making one. I've tried playing with this new Financial, and the bonus 15%

Consider: You are researching rifling, and are going to be the first civ to get it. You plan to mass upgrade your experienced City Raider macemen to rifles, and lean your might heavily upon some unfortunate neighbour. THIS is the time when you slow your research down, and build up cash (+15%) rapidly - even more rapidly with this trait. It gets you a lot of cash, particularly when you can whip the economic buildings cheaply.
Ind
- +1on tiles with 3
- Double Speed: Workers
Hard to say here... would this be balanced ? i dont think so but not sure :/
I'd rather say +1H on mines.
I don't think +1

