For me, I think the biggest change will be to plan my districts away from rivers as much as possible, and to use the riverside land more for farming. I want those sweet bonus yields as much as possible.
I can also imagine myself planning to build a dam to within 1 turn, wait for the river to flood one last time to gain yields, and then finish the dam immediately after that, right before I end up placing an important piece there that I don't want wrecked.
In the past, I have always been skeptical about the idea of natural disasters in Civ. Having seen what Ed and co. have done with them over the past few weeks has really convinced me that these will be a great addition to the game. I think unpredictable interactions with the landscape will make a relatively static game much more spontaneous and enjoyable.
Hmm, I wasn't planning on building that many dams. I can see the AI now will have a propensity to attack dams. Dams will be the new neighborhoods.
If you only have farms on a river, do you really need a dam? Seems the extra food would be nice. I really can only see building a dam if I have districts on that river that will be damaged. For my initial game I will go damless unless I have districts to protect.
edit: Oh I see the advisor says it protects against drought too. Still not sure I want to build that many.
I'm confused by the dam sabotage. I would have expected a 'flood' immediately after the sabotage but their was nothing in that graphic. Does it just mean you aren't protected from floods that might occur while the dam is sabotaged? As that's much weaker.
Do not forget that in the Industrial/ Modern era you can unlock the hydroelectric station for the Dam district to generate clean power. They will be a multi-purpose district.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.