Geronimo20
Emperor
Done! I can log in correctly now...
Much better than when I was running it.I was thinking about quality of our PITBOSS game. I don't know how other PITBOSS games looks like (becouse it's my first) but i think is not bad (enought fast and not bad stability).
Agreed, neither can I but I would like to add that maybe there should be a rule about no attacking within the first X amount of rounds. Maybe 25 or 50? I know that I am the one that attacked and killed first but looking back on that maybe I was a bit hasty. Maybe we can have that player come back in the next game.By the way, it is possible to start a new game by someone (i can't) with same settings and same players ? Will be nice![]()
Another solution could be to run a second Pitboss on the same computer as this one is running. I don't know if it will markedly slow down the games in this case. Has anyone experienced this?
I would be up for another game anyway. And unlike in SP games, I find this kind of archipelago map interesting to play in MP!
Thanks for the info Munro!
I observed some typical When someone is playing a turn, the CPU use is about 20-25%. And for internet bandwith usage, it seems low, except when someone connects (hard to evaluate). Only once, three people tried to connect at the same time and the third one failed to get in. So it may be the limit at connection stage.
Is this new pitboss in place of this, or separate of this?
Since is a new pitboss and this game continue, I vote for the game, but if it means that this games stops, then I don't want it to happen.