- Joined
- Mar 17, 2007
- Messages
- 9,303
My argument sides on the lines for using laptops for gaming. Dont tell me that newer generation notebooks are powerful when yet they crap out after a year or two and eats up video cards like there is no tommorow. Sure you can play non graphic insensive games on a notebook, but it can only go so far if you play a graphics intensive game (Half Life 2, Garry's Mod, Crysis, etc) before finaly the video card just craps out on you due to overheating issues.
That's a quality issue, and it doesn't affect all notebooks. The overall failure rate probably is a bit higher because of the higher average operating temperature, but if you get a notebook with a decent cooling system, it's quite possible for the video card to last a long time even with heavy use. Consider that some laptops use desktop Pentium 4's or desktop Core 2 Quads - it's certainly possible to design a laptop with a good enough cooling system to run a power-hungry video card heavily.
And performance-wise, if you get a high-end card a notebook can certainly give quite good performance even on very demanding games. I've yet to have any problems in 17 months playing some pretty intensive games (Medieval 2, Trackmania, even CoD4 runs well), and I've got the less-heat-tolerant-than-average 8600M GT. And it hasn't overheated at all - most of the time the temperature peaks in the lower 70's. And that's without cleaning out the vents. So if you have a decently designed notebook thermal-wise, there's no reason you can't expect a good video card to last a long time.
My laptop's a Dell for reference; they tend to be rated fairly well in thermal design recently. The only other company I know of to have a reputation there is Apple, whose notebooks tend to run hot (partly the cost of being thinner).
Now certainly a desktop will have slightly better average lifespan for its parts due to the greater airflow (usually - my parents' desktop has absurd hard drive temperatures), and not moving around. But I think the fragility of laptops is fairly overstated these days.
It's true that desktops will get you the same performance for less money, and thus I'll probably get a desktop the next time I get a computer, assuming my laptop is still working at that time. But it is nice to be able to use a laptop wherever, and as someone who attends an out-of-state college it's extremely nice to be able to have my laptop's performance at home and at college.
2 years for upgrades though, stickciv? I'm used to more like 4 years, and after 1.5 years with my current laptop I don't anticipate that changing. If I felt compelled to upgrade every 2 years, then yes, a desktop would certainly have more advantages.
So if I had to have one, it would definitely be a laptop. But I don't really see any reason to have two laptops that both are respectably modern (I'd define that as anything Pentium 4 or later these days, off the top of my head).