DG4 Discussion - Const: Preamble Thru C

[donsig]

@ravensfire: My answer to the *problems* you noted (posts #41 and #43) is that we get our ducks in a row for each section (as we seem to have done here), poll for acceptance and lock those sections down if they are accepted as shown by the poll. Once accepted we don't look back. Any tweaking can be done through whatever amendment or law passing procedure we come up with - but the tweaking can wait till the game starts.

What can we possible want to change in the preamble and first three articles that we haven't already discussed?!? Let's write this section and move on!!!!!

 

[FortyJ]

I concur. Let's light this candle!

Sorry, got a little carried away there. But donsig is correct. Can we please, please, please either agree on the wording of this section or at least summarize the choices so that they can be polled.

I call for the question.

 

[ravensfire]

Second the call!

The verbage is great - the issue donsig and I are discussing is completely unrelated to this, it's a procedural question that may never be needed (or resolved!)

-- Ravensfire

 

[donsig]

The poll was called and seconded and has been posted here.