I had no issue with
@Lily_Lancer ’s formula, must be my head as I prefer their formula.
Let us not forget who bought this thread up
Good luck with those aggressive civs and barbs
@Timewarp
Thank you.
Aggressive Barbs I deal with using lots of archers. Which is not an original formula, people on this forum have beat the idea into my head that archers are very powerful in the field.
Aggressive Civs I intend to use methods that PotatoMcWhiskey and Marbozir have demonstrated multiple times over on YouTube:
Have enough defense to hold them off at first. This means having quite a few archers spread through my empire.
Then spam archers - as well as the same archers used to subdue aggressive barbarians - to eliminate the attacking civ's units as they send, I mean suicide, EVERY ONE of their military units.
Then, they tell you they have no more military units by offering gold for peace.
Then you take the two or three melee units, 1 battering ram, and your experienced archer team to take over their civ.
So, what PotatoMcWhiskey and Marbozir seem to be claiming - and are definitely demonstrating - is that aggressive nearby civs are a bonus. They suicide their armies against you, making your units, mostly archers, experienced, and then they have defenseless easy to take cities.
They both go through this exercise so effortlessly that it seems like once you get used to it, it is not a hard process. In fact, if it weren't for the differences in their accents, it would be hard to distinguish their playing styles. They both play the actual attack phases so quickly and confidently that it leads me to believe that I will learn how to do this once I've gone through the process a few times.
Oh yeah, both of these people get comments about the mistakes they made along the way. The complaints seem so trite. People watch masters in action, and then gripe about the lack of perfection.
I am still working on playing the beginning decently, so I have not gotten to the point of getting other civs to attack me so that I can take them over. One step at a time. The step of getting 10 cities by turn 70 has turned out to be not so easy. I think that is the target you set in a previous post. I am about half of that. I want to get to at least 7 or 8 - not as good as you seem to always get, but at least I'll be in the ballpark - before moving on to the next phase of the game.