Do we really need balance between civilization? The Civ6 has never be, and will never become a balanced game, indeed power of Civs, starting locations, city states, etc. are hugely gapped. Hills with trees are strictly better than plains. Kumasi and Geneva are superior to Antioch or Singapore, Babylon and Gran Columbia are much more powerful than Canada or Georgia to any extent. Does this imbalanced setting actually brings more fun, as being imbalanced brings a lot of different situations, much more than being balanced, and therefore games will be less repetitive? Also, as the developers are not able to make AI with simple intelligence, for single player game there has never been balance, and balance has never been important. Is it the case for Civ6?