Do you support the Iraq war TODAY??? NOTE: READ ARGUMENT FIRST! THEN vote
- Thread starter Emperor2
- Start date
A Revolutionary
Beating the Drums
I do not support the war. IMO the US had no reason to invade Iraq. Why would a new dictatorship support terrorist attacks on their own people?
BirraImperial
Pura Vida!
I never supported the war in Iraq, I don't support it now. Iraqis should be left alone. Maybe an international force lead by the UN could finish the job. i don't know, this war was a mistake from the very beginning.
EDIT: @Emperor: Just because some ppl with common sense don't support this war, that doesn't mean we are commies.
EDIT: @Emperor: Just because some ppl with common sense don't support this war, that doesn't mean we are commies.
GenMarshall
High Elven ISB Capt & Ghost Agent
Well, he did made an extraordinary claim that 90% of CFCers are Political Lefites. (Though there are Moderate CFCers who do exist here)
moderate is far left compared to emperor.
your arguement relies on faulty logic through and through. pulling out doesnt mean people died in vain, it means people died trying. oh well. and the idea there is going to be another war is also wrong. There wont be if we dont let another one happen.
your arguement relies on faulty logic through and through. pulling out doesnt mean people died in vain, it means people died trying. oh well. and the idea there is going to be another war is also wrong. There wont be if we dont let another one happen.
Algerian Civil War
Second Chadian Civil War
Lebanon Fighting Palestinian Terrorists
Afghanistan
2nd Secret War in Laos
Civil War in Chiapas, Mexico
Civil War in Colombia
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Communist and Islamic Insurgency in Philippines
Civil Strife in Peru
Sri Lankan Civil War
Kurdish Separatists
Free Papua Movement
Second Ugandan Civil War
Casamance Conflict
Somali Civil War
Kashmir
Niger Delta Conflict
Nagaland Ethnic Conflict
Brazilian Gang Wars
Caprivi Conflict
Ituri Conflict
Second Chechen War
Ivorian Civil War
Balochistan Conflict
Darfur
Southern Thai Insurgency
Maoist Insurgency in India
Mexican Drug Wars
Fatah - Hamas
Ongoing Conflicts
Somehow, I don't think the end of Iraq brings those 2 things.
You call yourself a Christian, then these people's deaths are "acceptable losses." That's sickening beyond belief.
cubsfan6506
Got u
That man i believe is a liar. He had personal gain. I also don't buy saddam only listened to him. I'm sure he is a rich man now.
Jawz II
Oh Dear
You have 27% of the people voting, still supporting this insane, stoopid failed tragedy, which was started based on lies, and you think this place if far left?
I don't wanna ever be near the world you live in, and that's not an insult.
I don't wanna ever be near the world you live in, and that's not an insult.
That bolded part is the same "logic" that communists and terrorists use to justify their actions.
BirraImperial
Pura Vida!
Fox News links won't get you anywhere here. No proof whatsoever has been found to this date that Saddam was capable of attacking the US or any other nation with WMD's at the time of the war. There is also no proof that he was planning to make/use them.
bob bobato
L'imparfait
I think we should leave right away, and let Iraq decide what gouvernement it wants.
The two have nothing to do with one another. Iraq has voted on the government it wants while we were there.
No, its logic used by any military commander since the beginning of warfare. If you think you've suffered too many casualties, you retreat or surrender. This user feels we, though from what basis we don't know, haven't suffered enough casualties in order to merit a retreat or surrender.
Merkinball
Deity
Does anybody remember the British ricin attacks before the outbreak of the war? It was done by a group known as Ansar Al Islam, the right hand of Al Queda. Ansar Al Islam had Iraq as it's base, it was the right hand of Al Queda, and the ricin used in Britain came out of Ansar al Islam camps in and around Tikrit.
I have a question. Can anybody possibly discern for me, a difference between the Taliban in Afghanistan, and the government of Iraq pre-GWII? Iraq was a state sponsor of Palestinian terror in a big. He provided arms and finances for Palestinian terrorist groups, and personally gave roughly $50,000 to the families of suicide bombers. He housed and protected a number of wanted terrorists, include Masawi. Masawi even stayed in one of Saddams presidential palaces. Saddam had a...very...lasseiz fairre policy when it came to Kurdish terrorist groups and Ansar Al Islam.
Has anybody considered what WAS found in violation of the UN resolutions. Sure, we found no stockpiles. Shame on the US intelligence community, and Bush for selling that crap. But...what was found was that Saddam had the capacity, the infrastructure, the knowledge, and additional resources to have a chemical AND biological weapons program that he had pre GWI in just six months. He had everything he needed, and he would have done it if the embargo was dropped (France and Germany were pushing for this by the way.) What's scarier, is that Saddam had the delivery systems already done. Unmanned drones, Scud II missile systems...
Could he attack America directly? No. But he could attack Israel directly (which he was doing anyway). He could attack Kuwait directly.
What the Taliban ever do to America? Nothing. They just wouldn't cooperate with us. So they had to go so we could get after Al Queda. What did Saddam do to us? Nothing. But we had more than enough premise to go in, and take care of Saddam.
Anybody who thinks Saddam was not an indirect threat is drinking the kool-aid. Anybody who thinks terrorism wasn't fostered in Iraq is drinking the kool-aid too. Anybody that thinks the humanitarian situation in Iraq was any better than any other hellhole on earth, is drinking the kool-aid.
I have a question. Can anybody possibly discern for me, a difference between the Taliban in Afghanistan, and the government of Iraq pre-GWII? Iraq was a state sponsor of Palestinian terror in a big. He provided arms and finances for Palestinian terrorist groups, and personally gave roughly $50,000 to the families of suicide bombers. He housed and protected a number of wanted terrorists, include Masawi. Masawi even stayed in one of Saddams presidential palaces. Saddam had a...very...lasseiz fairre policy when it came to Kurdish terrorist groups and Ansar Al Islam.
Has anybody considered what WAS found in violation of the UN resolutions. Sure, we found no stockpiles. Shame on the US intelligence community, and Bush for selling that crap. But...what was found was that Saddam had the capacity, the infrastructure, the knowledge, and additional resources to have a chemical AND biological weapons program that he had pre GWI in just six months. He had everything he needed, and he would have done it if the embargo was dropped (France and Germany were pushing for this by the way.) What's scarier, is that Saddam had the delivery systems already done. Unmanned drones, Scud II missile systems...
Could he attack America directly? No. But he could attack Israel directly (which he was doing anyway). He could attack Kuwait directly.
What the Taliban ever do to America? Nothing. They just wouldn't cooperate with us. So they had to go so we could get after Al Queda. What did Saddam do to us? Nothing. But we had more than enough premise to go in, and take care of Saddam.
Anybody who thinks Saddam was not an indirect threat is drinking the kool-aid. Anybody who thinks terrorism wasn't fostered in Iraq is drinking the kool-aid too. Anybody that thinks the humanitarian situation in Iraq was any better than any other hellhole on earth, is drinking the kool-aid.
who keeps making this kool-aid?
the iraqis whom never attacked the united states? the iraqi that lived under the tyranny of a dictator. not anarchy?
kool-aid or not, your rhetoric isnt backed up by anything other than emotion and speculation.
the iraqis whom never attacked the united states? the iraqi that lived under the tyranny of a dictator. not anarchy?
kool-aid or not, your rhetoric isnt backed up by anything other than emotion and speculation.
In regards to the ricin "attack":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_Green_ricin_plot
In regards to Ansar al Islam:
9/11 Commission Report states the following regarding Ansar al-Islam:
ComradeDavo
Formerly God
I opposed the war from the beginning and continue to do so now. We need a rapid exit strategy and an apology for the way the war was conducted and aknowledgement of it illegality.
Maybe you are so far right that everyone here is to your left
Similar threads
- Locked
