Originally posted by Sodak
Maybe I'll pick up a copy and read it. The only Hancock book I've read was about the Sphynx. He started it with what sounded like an attempt to write the intro to a revealed conspiracy, and that put me off. In the end, the book was good - not at all the secret mystery being hidden that was alluded to. His writing style is better suited to teevee programs, imho. That's why I think he's a sensationalist - the material is legitimate, but he seems to want to dress it up in intrigue and smoke and mirrors to draw readers. I do appreciate him for bringing very good ideas (by the "experts") into the mainsteam, tho. A dry textbook with the same topic would never be able to do that.