coko said:
Also in terms of France...wasn't it still quite a divided place around this time? Again with local lords, that while under the rule of one king did as they please (Burgundy, Normans & Franks)?
Again -- that all depends whether you are talking about the Dark Ages, Middles Ages, or Renaissance periods. They are fundamentally different.
In the Dark Ages in France prior to Charlemagne for example, the Franks held mostly northern lands, north of the Loire River, east and west of the Rhine. South of that, we had essentially remnants of the Roman CIV in Aquitania mixed with Wisigoths, and mostly Ostrogoths in the Southeast.
In the 1100's which is what you seem to be thinking of, there was a King of France who had nominal political power over his vassals (mainly Aquitaine, Champagne, Anjou, Normandy, Burgundy, and Toulouse). Each one of these vassals were much more powerful than their King. However, they did more or less accept the feodal hommage to their King mostly as a way to placate the other rival vassals. It made for a very weak and chaotic monarchy.
In the 1300's, the French monarchy was very much in control of the lands recognized as "French" and the vassals who held them, the French Royal Domaine was also much bigger, although the people's sentiment of being "French" (as opposed to being subjects of the local Duchy or County) really did not come about until after the second Hundred Years War, at the beginning of the Renaissance.
During the late 1400's Renaissance, we're talking about a modern "State" that is administered by professionals in the government, along with people who call and think of themselves as French citizens. There still are nobles, but their powers are much more limited compared to middle ages. These are completely different eras. Obviously some similar development applies to other regions of Europe which is why it gets tough to simulate a long period of time in CIV and still remain somewhat historical.