Frustrated with immortal

It's not bad at all, but a few remarks that are important imo but you've been a bit casual with them
  • improve the seafood immediately. It speeds up the development of the city tremendously. You had plenty of cities that can get out a 30:hammers: unit easily in time.
  • have your religion in every (meaningful) city, especially since you are in org rel. And there is no excuse really, since you can 2-pop whip a missionary in any city.
  • have a plan for :gp:. I think you are doing fine really if you now just keep growing and start a GA with Pyongyang-dude when you have access to pacifism. Otherwise I don't think lib is in the bag at all.
  • growing in anticipation of the golden age and whipping buildings are not synergistic ideas, they are competing with each other and you can't really do both. I wouldn't build any markets or courthouses, probably no (more) forges even. It's because I know I will win quicker without any of those buildings. I understand that if you don't have a clear vision of when you will win you think the buildings are of great value, especially with org rel. But they won't win you the game.
So what I'd do now: Switch research to philo. Run two scientists in Pyongyang to speed it up. Pick 3 cities that have lots of food but can give cottages away and grow them to as big as possible before the GA (i.e. don't whip buildings in these). Then at philo start the golden age and get :gp: out from these cities, optimally from the weakest one first, sacrificing pop even. You have use for 3 GS (double bulb edu, single bulb liberalism) and rest of the :gp: are optimally GMs. Get as many :gp: as possible out during the GA (should be easy to get 4?). Conquer the map with cuirassiers and gg.

It's not the only way, I mean you can build buildings and even win space if you want I think. I know nothing about that. ;)
 
On Immortal your current position should be sufficient for going to space, although that would be tough. If Charly or Huayna get any more cities your chances for this will plummet. If you want to try, after Lib go for Printing Press, Corporation, Communism and then directly beeline Computers. With 12 cities on Immortal the econ techs are probably more important than State property. (Get Rifling only if you are threatened.)

Now additionally I think that using your GS to build an Academy in 225 AD is too late. IMHO that one should have bulbed Philo, even if SB already had it. Philo is 1300:science:, and your Academy is generating around 40/turn, while running 100% science. To get more beakers than from the Philo-bulb, you would need around 30 turns of science. You probably will not reach this before Lib, meaning that building the Academy instead of bulbing effectively has slowed your run for Lib.

Cheju is a poor city, it really should not have built any infrastructure, except maybe a granary. That would have gotten your Workboats earlier.

Rajavihara will take an eternity to build Moai, no matter the way you want to win this is a mistake.

Regarding Tech choices, due to your current lead probably Philo-Nat should come before going for Lib, to try for Taj, especially since there is Marble for trade. And ofc for :gp:.
 
Now additionally I think that using your GS to build an Academy in 225 AD is too late. IMHO that one should have bulbed Philo, even if SB already had it. Philo is 1300:science:, and your Academy is generating around 40/turn, while running 100% science.
Oh absolutely, I actually missed it was built so late. Academy is not for military games (unless PHI maybe). Nearly always my first :gp: bulbs philo, not for the religion but for the excellent civic it unlocks.

Regarding Tech choices, due to your current lead probably Philo-Nat should come before going for Lib, to try for Taj, especially since there is Marble for trade. And ofc for :gp:.
Yes Taj is excellent if you can get it.
 
That's some good GP advice, I never really have a clear plan for those. Although in the Pacal game I had a brainwave and switched to caste and pacifism during a music-fueled GA, and got a bunch of GS that way. But it's not an ingrained habit of mine, I often simply don't think about it. Probably if SB hadn't had philo already I would have bulbed it. But now I get that it would have been worth it regardless because of pacifism.

I feel like I should tell the island story better because I got really unlucky with the barb boats there. Upon resuming the game I immediately switched two cities to settlers and one to a galley to whip them the next turn. I first settled the northern island which had a fish that had already been improved by the Koreans. However, on the turn I settled it, it got pillaged by a barb galley that had been chasing after somebody's workboat. I managed to get away from it with my galley, going north, which was the only way to get out of its reach, but then it just camped on the fish and blocked my galley from going back south to pick up the other settler. Meaning I had to whip a second galley in Angkor Thom, which significantly slowed down the settlement of the southern island. Furthermore, I had to wait until MC to dislodge that barb galley.

The southern island had three barb galleys around it. The fact that it was separated from the mainland by ocean and had ocean fish, meant I could have completely ignored the galleys if I had whipped a WB on the island, which would have taken ages due to slow growth. But sneaking through a workboat from the mainland would have been tricky.
 
1000 AD
Spoiler :

I decided to go for the philo-nat route. Switched to Caste and Paci during a golden age. Only managed to get 2 GP, one priest, which I used to extend the golden age. Then none of my cities had enough food to get another GP out before the end of the second GA (they would starve back one pop/turn). But my tech rate is pretty fast now, 1 turned Edu after bulbing it, now trying to get music before Lib to use it for Mil Trad. The others don't seem to be anywhere close. Traded marble from Ragnar and started on the Taj in the capital. AP got built and so I'm spamming Buddhist buildings for the hammers. As you can see I started building a university but I'm not sure Oxford is worth it. I can get some interesting tech trades (Engineering especially). On the geopolitical front, Monty declared war on HC, but probably won't get anywhere.

1000 AD (upper Khmer).JPG

1000 AD (lower Khmer).JPG

 

Attachments

  • Sury Leaning game 1 AD-1000.CivBeyondSwordSave
    201.8 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
I managed to get away from it with my galley, going north, which was the only way to get out of its reach
IMO this is a mistake. If you have a Galley standing around and fishing boats are about to be pillaged you should take the fight. Without promotions you should have about a 2/3 chance to win the battle, if you defend.
But sneaking through a workboat from the mainland would have been tricky.
This is not true. You are Creative and the Barbs cannot enter ocean, even in your borders. Thus the WB could have easily slipped by through the north. It would probably have worked to let the Galleys live and let the AI Caravels handle them.

Now about the current state.

As you have noticed chaining Golden Ages where you want to starve out :gp: does not work well. There is no reason why the second GA had to happen now.

A side remark about the Taj in GAs: If you complete the Taj during a GA you get an extra GA turn for free. Thus if you would have wanted to trigger the second GA now you should have waited to let the food fill up in your cities and to finish the Taj in the GA.

Now at this stage in the game you should already have though out your path to win. If you want to conquer the world you should start scouting, definitely not build Universities, skip the Coloussus and maybe already start building Phants to upgrade. Even for failgold the Colossus is not really worth it at this point with just 250 :hammers:, due to the unpredictability when you get it.

If you want to win by space from your current position you should build infrastructure (Oxford) and not Lib Military Tradition. For a space plan the war between Monty and Huayna is bad news, because Huayna has more cities and is more advanced. (Monty does not have Machinery or Civil Service, Huayna has Engineering and Guilds.) Monty will most likely quickly lose his stack and then be overrun by Huayna. In this case the second GA should have been saved to build factories.

If you want to win by space after conquering someone you should first focus on the war and follow the gameplan for conquest and whenever you want just build to space from a dominant position.

In any case you should scout the state of the ongoing war.

The way you played is obviously going into a cuir-rush, so consider the above advice. Also you want to trade for theology (Theocracy) for an additional promotion per unit. Engineering should definitely be traded for, Guilds too, but at lower priority (speeds up Gunpowder, if the Cuirs do not work this is on the way to Rifling).

Concerning Tech coices it would be good to take up the habit of partially researching Lib before picking up whatever prerequisites the tech you want to Lib needs, since that increases your chances to get Lib in a contested race. Libbing something you do not necessarily want is better than letting an AI Lib something.

Lastly this is not the time for your workers to be idle! Nampo is working an unimproved tile, several plains still need an improvement and you are missing many roads. Every tile in your empire should have a road, before you let your workers be idle. Maybe they also should start roading your target's territory in preparation. After this is done they can even be used for scouting pre-war.
 
Had a quick look.
You do love your monasteries. I guess with AP it adds hammers. Only really worth it in capital.
You need music for military tradition and likely compass to bulb lib. Where is the great scientist coming from?
In pacifsm and not actually running any scientists? Hariharalayla for 9 turns? More once GA ends. No real city with huge food surplus.
Lib looks safe as no AI has Edu yet. 9-10+ turns is a long time.
 
Had a quick look.
You do love your monasteries. I guess with AP it adds hammers. Only really worth it in capital.
You need music for military tradition and likely compass to bulb lib. Where is the great scientist coming from?
In pacifsm and not actually running any scientists? Hariharalayla for 9 turns? More once GA ends. No real city with huge food surplus.
Lib looks safe as no AI has Edu yet. 9-10+ turns is a long time.
I always build monasteries and temples in the AP religion. It's equivalent to a PH mine, or even plains iron with a forge, for every city.
I switched the cities out of running scientists because I realized I wasn't going to get another one before the end of the golden age. The idea is to switch out of caste + pacifism on the last turn of the GA, right? But I guess it might be worth getting those GP points even if it won't yield a GS during the GA? Btw I don't think bulbing lib is happening since I traded for machinery...
 
The idea is to switch out of caste + pacifism on the last turn of the GA, right? But I guess it might be worth getting those GP points even if it won't yield a GS during the GA?
Correct in both cases.
I always build monasteries and temples in the AP religion. It's equivalent to a PH mine, or even plains iron with a forge, for every city.
Again it depends on your gameplan. the production from the Monastery pays back in 30 turns, from the temple in 40, a bit less with forges. If the game is over before then it is an effective loss in production. Since they provide other boni I consider it to be worth it if the production can pay back before the game is essentially over.
 
Correct in both cases.

Again it depends on your gameplan. the production from the Monastery pays back in 30 turns, from the temple in 40, a bit less with forges. If the game is over before then it is an effective loss in production. Since they provide other boni I consider it to be worth it if the production can pay back before the game is essentially over.
My reasoning is essentially that I can get a bunch of them in now before getting all of the techs for Cuirs. Building wealth will speed up the tech but not the production. Or should I go full elebuild mode already for upgrades later? Not sure what's optimal.
 
I think you need to completely re-think buildings. It's probably the most common mistake in the game anyway, overbuilding buildings that is.

In cuir games you do NOTHING with universities. Absolutely nothing, it's just 200:hammers: down the drain. You do very little with :science: after you've researched the techs you need for cuirs. You can use :gold: for upgrades. Yes it is optimal to build lots of units and upgrade them immediately when you can.

AP buildings are not as good as you think. They will pay back if the game lasts that 30/40 turns, but even that doesn't mean that you should build them. They need to pay back better than building a unit.

In cuir games what you need is a granary and that's it really. Barracks and CRE libraries are decent and you've had a long time to build it so you probably will have it in most cities. Stables are already a bit of a luxury and there is IMO no point in trying to build them everywhere. Not every unit needs to start with 5XP. My opinion is that forges close to never make an impact in cuir games. The stronger your position is the weaker they become (because you are winning sooner). Markets, courthouses etc are mostly meaningless.
 

In this game I had +50 cavalry 1000AD (with NTT even). You haven't even started cuir production at the same date... No worries, you will win, it's just that there are a lot of things you could do better.
 
Some bad news: tried to attack Charly with about 30 cuirs in 1180, which normally would have been more than enough, but due to a series of careless mistakes on my part, I ended up losing more than half of the 50 cuirs I had built by 1200-something, and there is no real perspective on winning this war right now. He proved to be an extremely tough nut to crack. So I'm going to go back to the 1180 save and try again, now making sure to declare, wait for his stack to appear and then taking it out in the field. Then I will keep my stack together at all cost, actually taking time to heal, before taking the next city. Really a case of being impatient and then just full on tilting. It could have been an almost perfect game, but I guess it won't be. Oh well. At least I'm learning a lot.
 
It was always going to be an interesting save. How did you lose half the cuirs? Did you locate his stack before you attacked? Never attack big stacks on hill when protective? Were they all C2/3? You want at least 2-3 promotions.
 
It was always going to be an interesting save. How did you lose half the cuirs? Did you locate his stack before you attacked? Never attack big stacks on hill when protective? Were they all C2/3? You want at least 2-3 promotions.
It was a combination of factors really. First of all I didn't switch to Vassalage, only to Theo. Second, I declared with 20 cuirs at the border (I had a total of 30 but the others were still on the move), and took his southern city instantly. I then put some of the arriving units together with a part of the stack on the jungle patch above the easter Korean city, where it got hit with siege and a big stack. I ended up winning that battle but it cost me like 9 cuirs or so. I should really just have reloaded at that point, and waited for his stack to come out and then hitting it myself. I still had plenty of cuirs, but his capital had like 20 units in it (which had been there since before I declared), had a lot of culture around it and was spaced far apart both from my border and from the city I conquered off him. Furthermore, it's on a river, and to avoid it you have to go around the city. This was terrible for the supply lines. I was getting impatient, thinking that it would be easy now (as it had been for previous cuir stomps on immortal at an equivalent point in the war). I promoted a bunch of cuirs with flanking 1-2 and just started hitting the cap, thinking the breakthrough would come soon. Truth is, I didn't get any good odds against the highly promoted Landsknechts, and he would occasionally hit me with a catapult or two. The damage per unit would be low but still, units being wounded severely reduces their odds.

So for next time, I will try to have at least 30 units at the border before declaring, and then I'll sit back, scouting for his stack every turn and taking it out in the field when it appears. Only then I will focus on conquests, and will only move on the cap when I have a stack of 30 full-health cuirs that can move as one. Nevertheless, it's still going to be very tough.
 
If you are going to attack an AI at least work out where the AI's stack is.

Personally i would of picked a weaker target first. As HRE is a protective civ and was the strongest here.

SB, Aztec and Vking look much softer targets. Least till you have 30-50 cuirs.

Sometimes better to let the AI stack come to you first. If you attack with 20 units and his stack is 20 units you needed much more cuirs. Where I doubt Aztecs or SB have a stack of 5-10 units.

Can we see the save before you attack next time.
 
If you are going to attack an AI at least work out where the AI's stack is.

Personally i would of picked a weaker target first. As HRE is a protective civ and was the strongest here.

SB, Aztec and Vking look much softer targets. Least till you have 30-50 cuirs.

Sometimes better to let the AI stack come to you first. If you attack with 20 units and his stack is 20 units you needed much more cuirs. Where I doubt Aztecs or SB have a stack of 5-10 units.

Can we see the save before you attack next time.
Hmm yeah maybe a weaker target would be better. I'm never very sure when to go for the leader and when to go for a weaker civ. Had some bad experiences leaving the strongest for last. Could go Aztecs first. Also when I whip my cities down how do I avoid crashing my economy? Is it just mass cuirs all the way now?

Edit: And yes, will post the 1180 save when I have the opportunity.
 
First of all I didn't switch to Vassalage, only to Theo.
There is very little difference between units with 5xp and 7xp, even for Charismatic leaders. Both will only have two promotions. For this reason I stay in bureaucracy, except the in the rare cases when the unit maitenence gets out of hand and the game is not won yet. Adopting Vassalage for only the xp-bonus is a mistake as soon as theocracy is available.

Regarding the attack strategy, you want to attack only if you think you can take the city this turn, except if you will have neglibible losses. Any surviving enemy unit will get xp, maybe promote and heal quickly, making follow-up attacks harder. A similar line of thought leads to the conclusion that flanking promotions are usually useless. You want to kill units and flanking does not help to do this. If you have enough units to take out damaged defenders left over after attacking with flanking units you have enough units to just hit the city with units promoted in the combat line. Granted flanking may increases withdrawl odds, but at the cost of winning odds. Also a unit that withdrew will need to heal a few turns before becomeing useful again, slowing any attack.

I assume your scouting discovered both his big stack and the stack in the capital. IMHO you were not ready for this attack, either wait or choose another target. As soon as the AI gets attacked they usually start spamming units, thus the key to a sucessful attack is speed. As I understand it you got held up after taking only one city. At this point the AI will probably be producing enough troops to hold against your attack, thus you should take peace ASAP, before you lose your army, and try to use it against a softer target (here Monty or SB).

So for next time, I will try to have at least 30 units at the border before declaring, and then I'll sit back, scouting for his stack every turn and taking it out in the field when it appears. Only then I will focus on conquests, and will only move on the cap when I have a stack of 30 full-health cuirs that can move as one.
If you know where the stack is at the beginning of the war you can plot out its possible routes towards you. Since speed is key you should try to take (weak) cities before the stack arrives, if possible on the way of the enemy stack, and try to keep your stack on useable roads. To speed things up I think you should at least consider to take out the capitals defences with a spy, since that would probably significantly speed up your attack, at the cost of 2-3 spies and 1-2 turns of science. Espionage would also get you city visibility and help with scouting.

Hmm yeah maybe a weaker target would be better. I'm never very sure when to go for the leader and when to go for a weaker civ. Had some bad experiences leaving the strongest for last.
Cuirassiers are fine before Grenadiers and especially Rifles come along. If you want to go to war with Cuirs anything before that does not really matter, so attacking the Civs closest to these units first does have its merits. Frequently these are the ones with bigger empires and more troops. OTOH Civs with weaker military can be attacked earlier. IMHO if the good techers will still not have these techs after you are done with a weaker target I would go after a weaker target first. Also in the war against a weaker target you will need less units and lose less, as well as getting additional production capabilities, meaning that the number of units will increase significantly during the war.

Also when I whip my cities down how do I avoid crashing my economy? Is it just mass cuirs all the way now?
Except your Capital all cities should be whipped. In this case the Capital will be comfortably 2-turning Cuirs, efficient whipping can not get a faster production than one every two turns. Your economy can recover after you win the war. As long as your units are not on strike the economy should not be prioritized during wartime.
 
There is very little difference between units with 5xp and 7xp, even for Charismatic leaders. Both will only have two promotions. For this reason I stay in bureaucracy, except the in the rare cases when the unit maitenence gets out of hand and the game is not won yet. Adopting Vassalage for only the xp-bonus is a mistake as soon as theocracy is available.

Regarding the attack strategy, you want to attack only if you think you can take the city this turn, except if you will have neglibible losses. Any surviving enemy unit will get xp, maybe promote and heal quickly, making follow-up attacks harder. A similar line of thought leads to the conclusion that flanking promotions are usually useless. You want to kill units and flanking does not help to do this. If you have enough units to take out damaged defenders left over after attacking with flanking units you have enough units to just hit the city with units promoted in the combat line. Granted flanking may increases withdrawl odds, but at the cost of winning odds. Also a unit that withdrew will need to heal a few turns before becomeing useful again, slowing any attack.

I assume your scouting discovered both his big stack and the stack in the capital. IMHO you were not ready for this attack, either wait or choose another target. As soon as the AI gets attacked they usually start spamming units, thus the key to a sucessful attack is speed. As I understand it you got held up after taking only one city. At this point the AI will probably be producing enough troops to hold against your attack, thus you should take peace ASAP, before you lose your army, and try to use it against a softer target (here Monty or SB).


If you know where the stack is at the beginning of the war you can plot out its possible routes towards you. Since speed is key you should try to take (weak) cities before the stack arrives, if possible on the way of the enemy stack, and try to keep your stack on useable roads. To speed things up I think you should at least consider to take out the capitals defences with a spy, since that would probably significantly speed up your attack, at the cost of 2-3 spies and 1-2 turns of science. Espionage would also get you city visibility and help with scouting.


Cuirassiers are fine before Grenadiers and especially Rifles come along. If you want to go to war with Cuirs anything before that does not really matter, so attacking the Civs closest to these units first does have its merits. Frequently these are the ones with bigger empires and more troops. OTOH Civs with weaker military can be attacked earlier. IMHO if the good techers will still not have these techs after you are done with a weaker target I would go after a weaker target first. Also in the war against a weaker target you will need less units and lose less, as well as getting additional production capabilities, meaning that the number of units will increase significantly during the war.


Except your Capital all cities should be whipped. In this case the Capital will be comfortably 2-turning Cuirs, efficient whipping can not get a faster production than one every two turns. Your economy can recover after you win the war. As long as your units are not on strike the economy should not be prioritized during wartime.
That's all very helpful advice, thanks. Right now I'm tending towards attacking a weaker civ first. Going after SB will secure my northern border. However, the Aztecs are super backward and have a stack in Incan territory. Diplomatically and military it would be very cheap to go after them first. It would also enlarge my border with Charly and give me better access to his cities. Perhaps most importantly, it would reduce the chances of Monty vassaling to HC, which could make the latter a runaway. Regarding Charly's tech path, he's going the economics route iirc, hoping for Willem syndrome but hard to tell right now.

Edit: btw, in the Maya game I went after SB and Monty before attacking Charly, who was the leader (I know, the exact same neighbors as in this game!). Admittedly, I hit cavalry and upgraded everything right after taking SB's capital, as my tech rate was much faster. By the time I got to Charly I had cannons.
 
Even though your attack is a bit late, I'd always start from the nearest, most easily assimilated AI. Attacking the strongest AI first only if that leader AI is about to gain some tech after which he/she is very hard to take out.
the Aztecs are super backward and have a stack in Incan territory.
Yeah 100% start from there.
 
Top Bottom