Games like Civilization

Louis the XIV

Sun King
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
838
Location
Court of Versailles
Because I have played Sid Meier's Civilization 4 BTS and Warlords too much I decided to ask fellow civ fans what games are like Civ 4 and which ones you recommend.
If anyone has any recommendations tell me below!
 
hmm...can't think of much in the way of historical 4X TBS games outside IV and other iterations of Civ. There is a new Civ type game called "Old World" made by the lead designer of IV - Soren Johnson. It's sold only by Epic Games right now. I've not played it. It does look interesting. Has more a a V design look to it, but appears to have some very new mechanics.

Some fantasy 4X games are out there like Endless Legend and Fallen Enchantress. Endless Legend I own but it did not really grab me, but it seems to be well liked otherwise. Fallen Enchantress is a Stardock game that brought in Kael, the lead modder on Fall From Heaven, to fix up that game and add his own touch. Fallen Enchantress had a poor launch but eventually became a pretty good game with Kael's help.

Age of Wonders III is another fantasy 4X TBS that has done quite well. I own it.

Other than that you have mainly real time historical games like Age of Empires and Rise of Nations. Games are very old now. I played the heck out of Age of Empire years ago. Steam has a Enhanced version of AoE now that actually is getting new content as well.

If you want something a bit different in style you can try Paradox games. I played tons of Crusader Kings II and Europa Universalis IV and can recommend both highly. These are "Grand Strategy" games. Paradox just released Crusader Kings III. I don't own that yet. But Crusader Kings II is very much worth playing regardless. EU IV is fantastic. Both those games go on sale on Steam rather often, so if interested you can wait for that. However, I should not that though the base games should go onsale for around 9 bucks, these games of loads of DLC which do add up to a good bit of money. And the DLCs are pretty important to how the games function, especially with respect to the large patches Paradox puts out regularly. EU IV is still being updated. (Patches mean something a little different with Paradox as they include a lot of new free content beyond just the normal idea of fixes. That free content generally coincides with DLC content)

For something really different, I'd recommend Mount & Blade Warband. I'd classify it as a real time strategy medieval combat sandbox. The game intentionally, at the time, was not a graphical marvel - it was created originally by a mom and pop team out of Turkey. However, there is a tremendous modding community for M&B and some great mods. The combat mechanic is spectacular. One of my favorite games of all time. (M&B II is currently in early access on Steam)
 
I came very close to buying Europe Universalis and may buy it.
Age of Empires, I have seen some gameplay and feel as if it might be a bit to complicated for me, as well as Crusader Kings.
I just bought Heroes of Might and Magic III and it is pretty interesting so far.
I will definitely search up Mount & Blade Warband since it sounds very interesting and also Fallen Enchantress sounds very interesting especially if it was created by Kael who created the awesome mod FFH.
Anyway, the my next game will probably be Europe Universalis IV.
Thanks for replying!
 
I played EU4 for years with thousands of hours, so not exactly condemning the game. I stopped a couple years ago. The forum turned incredibly hostile to the clearly understaffed developers, who made several egregious changes, repeatedly failed to do basic QA testing/hotfixes, and pushed filler DLC content. The experience really turned me off Paradox games. You should definitely look at the final price tag you'd be paying for the base game and all the DLC. Without a sale, it's $200+ and most of the DLCs are not really optional. I wouldn't want you to regret the purchase, especially if they announce EUV soon. EUIV is primarily a map painter game, there is less to focus on with your individual nation besides expansion. CK2 is a character/roleplay based game, with more focus internally on your domain and politics. Its community was generally still very happy with the final DLCs for it.
 
Ah...HOMM is a good one. III is a classic, although it was really HOMM V where I got into the series. A similar game to HOMM that I played quite a bit of is "King's Bounty" released in 2008. (KB was a spiritual successor to a game released way back in the early 90s from what I understand). KB is very entertaining and should still look good now. Probably a bit less complex than HOMM but the combat aspects are similar and I recall the story a bit stronger. Several follow-ups were released afterwards, but I only played "KB: Armored Princess" which was indeed just as good. Can't speak to the others. KB II will be release next year.

There's some truth to what drewisfat say, but EUIV is still worth the investment - on sale - if you can afford it. CKII as well. Note that CKII is grand strategy like EUIV but does have a deeper role play mechanic with dynasties, as he mentioned. Think of it this way. EUIV you play a nation starting at around the beginning of the Renaissance, when nations really were starting to form. You primarily expand via conquest and diplomatic vassalization, although gains can be made via marriage by personal unions. CKII you basically play a "dynasty" and a "character", or in other words a ruling family, starting in the late Dark Ages. War is certainly a factor, but a lot of gains can be made by manipulating your dynasty and putting your line on other thrones. Training yourself and your progeny properly. Intrigue works a bit differently and is more complexly, and you can actually assassinate folks, even your spouse. (Completed CKII games can be transferred to EUIV)
 
Does EU IV have a possibility to play historical?

It basically is a very historical game - most Paradox grand strategies are. EU IV starts in 1444 with the map and nations mirroring the time period closely. Although the starting map has changed over the life of the game. Mainly those changes are incorporating new nations into the game, as well as what I called their interpretation of the relative diplomatic/governmental situations at that time. It was a time of great flux in that regard...well for the next few centuries really.

Take France for example. At game release, you add the nation of France with its provinces. But portions of what one would consider France today was broken into the vassals of Orleans, Aquitaine, Bourbon and some others. All of which were real subject states at the time. Then at some later release they decided to just go with a much larger France without all the vassals...again technically correct. Then again later, they broke up France once again even breaking out Norman provinces into the vassal Normandy. Regardless, France was just as powerful in each iterations. Vassals are completely subject to the master and their armies fight with you, plus you can diplo annex them.

Burgundy is another great example. At release, Burgundy was basically a blob with its provinces. A very strong nation and rival to France. As you may know Burgundy was a power at this time but was shortly on its way out of existence with the Succession. Anyway, later the broke up Burgundy into a still strong Burgundy plus several vassals and personal unions of Dutch and Flemish states.

Events in the game are historical and historically timed with some variance and randomness, such as the Burgundy Succession itself and the later the appearance of Netherlands and defection of Dutch states. Very detailed and historically accurate events across the world. That includes the religions as well such as the Reformation circa 1500AD and subsequent Holy Wars.

However, of course, the game can be played to alter history from that point forward. The historical events and happenings are still coded in but in some cases based on your actions you can great affect or eliminate certain things, or mitigate the results like the Reformation.
Of course, to answer your question directly you can try to role-play the game as historically as possible, at least from the perspective of the nation you are playing. The game is engineered t play as historically as possible in terms of events, but there is certainly the randomness as well. You have Ottoblob and the Big Blue Blob (France) and Mingsplotion, so any thing can happen with those nations.

HRE stuff is wild in this game. Probably one of the first things you'll want to do in this game is play Austria.

One way I think of EUIV is a very deep and complex game of Risk..ha

There is a HOMM V!?

Actually, there's a HOMM VII released in 2015. (I've not played VI or VII) V was released around 2006. I played it a long time ago, but recall graphically it is far superior to III. But III is consider by most the best of HOMM. I thought V was good though. I did play the heck out of it.

Oh..I was just checking on something I found out both King's Bounty and HOMM were both successors to the original 1990 King's Bounty. In fact, the same developer of the 1990 KB made HOMM 1 2 and 3.
 
Imo Homm 3 was the second best strategy game ever released, only behind Civ4.
But you need some of those great custom made maps & multiplayer strategies to fully see it's depth :)

Homm 3 still gets updated too (by players).
You can play Horn of the Abyss, and we have a graphic update called something like HD mod.
Still a MP community around as well.

One of the great smaller maps i remember can be found here https://www.heroes3maps.com/map/1832-fairy-tales
 
Imo Homm 3 was the second best strategy game ever released, only behind Civ4.
But you need some of those great custom made maps & multiplayer strategies to fully see it's depth :)

Homm 3 still gets updated too (by players).
You can play Horn of the Abyss, and we have a graphic update called something like HD mod.
Still a MP community around as well.

One of the great smaller maps i remember can be found here https://www.heroes3maps.com/map/1832-fairy-tales
Do you know if by any chance there is an Earth Map for HOMM3?
 
I played EU4 for years with thousands of hours, so not exactly condemning the game. I stopped a couple years ago. The forum turned incredibly hostile to the clearly understaffed developers, who made several egregious changes, repeatedly failed to do basic QA testing/hotfixes, and pushed filler DLC content. The experience really turned me off Paradox games. You should definitely look at the final price tag you'd be paying for the base game and all the DLC. Without a sale, it's $200+ and most of the DLCs are not really optional. I wouldn't want you to regret the purchase, especially if they announce EUV soon. EUIV is primarily a map painter game, there is less to focus on with your individual nation besides expansion. CK2 is a character/roleplay based game, with more focus internally on your domain and politics. Its community was generally still very happy with the final DLCs for it.

I was a huge fan of EUIV in its early days but as time has gone on, I also turned off it. I like to call it Europercentages Modifersalis; the entire game revolves around + or - modifiers to increasingly vague parameters. Nations just don't seem to have any identity at all. How can I go, "oh boy, Prussia looks awesome! Their armies have 5% more discipline!" Or, "Wow, Portugal is so much fun with their extra +30 colonial range!" It's just lame. Not to mention the monarch mana, used for basically everything...
 
Age of Wonders: Planetfall, Stellaris, and XCOM (not so similar, but I enjoy it as well). Also, there's a new Civ-like game coming in April, HUMANKIND, which seems to be very promising
 
Last edited:
Not truly a game like Civilization, but I had a lot of fun with Settlers 2 (10th year edition, a very good remake). The Vikings expansion adds even more to the game, like more customised scenarios/maps.

Added bonus: Lots of fun watching those little dudes go about their business, or working out on the spot, standing on their head, and so on :)

RimWorld is great fun too, although I must admit I haven't played it with the Royalty expansion. It doesn't have the empire-wide feel of Civ 4, but there is plenty to worry about while growing your colony, adding people, and not least fighting all the people and robots who come to kill you. One aspect is very similar to Civ 4, though. If you survive long enough, you get to build a spaceship and leave orbit -- after fighting off a colossal horde of invading forces who also want to leave the planet by killing you and capturing the ship (although they will oddly try to destroy it if allowed).
 
Thanks for all the exciting sounding games you mentioned! I think Settlers 2 does sound very awesome and Humankind also does sound promising.
Anyway I'll have a look at Settlers 2 next.
 
I found Command & Conquer Generals Deluxe Edition to be the 2nd best (though real time) Strategy game with Civilization IV being better.

The next is no advertising but the only source for C&C Generals nowadays because EA updated their Website and deleted their greatest (Real time) strategy game (C&C generals) :

Amazon.com: Command and Conquer Generals: Deluxe Edition - PC: Video Games

Have a look at it if you can, I had weeks of pleasure with it until I had all achievements and won every map against the maximum number of opponents on maximum difficulty and even PvPed successfully once :) .
 
Last edited:
I found Command & Conquer Generals Deluxe Edition to be the 2nd best (though real time) Strategy game with Civilization IV being better.

The next is no advertising but the only source for C&C Generals nowadays because EA updated their Website and deleted their greatest (Real time) strategy game (C&C generals) :

Amazon.com: Command and Conquer Generals: Deluxe Edition - PC: Video Games

Have a look at it if you can, I had weeks of pleasure with it until I had all achievements and won every map against the maximum number of opponents on maximum difficulty and even PvPed successfully once :) .
At the top of the page it says Platform: Windows XP, Windows 98, Windows Me
Does this mean it only works on those 3 or does it also work on Windows 10?
 
At the top of the page it says Platform: Windows XP, Windows 98, Windows Me
Does this mean it only works on those 3 or does it also work on Windows 10?

It' ll work on Windows 10, on that I' m sure. It' s just quite old already, but has great graphics and especially a tremdously right gameplay.

I salute,

Seraiel
 
Back
Top Bottom