General Turn Discussion

[Krill]

The axe from IS wouldn't get to CK before CK built it's own axe, so the IS axe should go to C3, as we need to remove the warrior from C3 to IS for happiness for a turn before the axe is built. The CK axe should probably just defend CK, a we need it for hapiness as well.

I think the only workers that are "unprotected" on our borders are the ones cottaging for C3, but it would take a warrior or archer something like 3 turns to reach them after we first saw them, so no worries there, and when we pasture the cow. Everything else should be safe, I think.

 

[Viva_Chingon]

How much would not having that warrior in IS slow down the completion of Axe3?

 

[Krill]

I don't know, it might not slow down the axe, but I think it slows the oracle by a turn and I don;t know what effect it has one worker6...

 

[remake20]

Stuy... S and Warrior by the lion (Name I forgot) N for the defense bonus. Good point.

Copper Kettle: Barracks

 

[Krill]

The lion will most likely attack before we can move Barentz though.

 

[Krill]

The lion didn't attack. We are safe to move Barentz.

Spoiler :

 

[AutomatedTeller]

I think N-N

 

[Ronnie1]

N this turn for sure.

 

[dutchfire]

I think N - NW makes more sense than N - N, to stay on the hills.

 

[AutomatedTeller]

Without the lion, I'd agree with N->NW, but it puts us next to a lion with only a 25% bonus. N-N keeps us away from the lion.

 

[Krill]

well, that desert tile might be a place for a good city, so we might as well look for seafood from that tile now instead of much later, if it also keeps us safe. The lion could only attack us if it moved onto the gold hill, and as we could see that from the desert tile we know if we have to avoid it.

 

[dutchfire]

Without the lion, I'd agree with N->NW, but it puts us next to a lion with only a 25% bonus. N-N keeps us away from the lion.

Well, it depends on where the lion will move of course. Getting attacked while we're in the forest would be best.

 

[Ronnie1]

How about we move N 1st, and then see what happens with the lion?

 

[Krill]

Well, that would make sense...

 

[Memphus]

negative. we should move N N. then see what happens with the lion. We can move NW afterwards and look and the move again based on where the lion is.

 

[Krill]

Well, we should move N and reconsider; NNW is bad because we are next to the lion, but NNE onto the desert means that we won't have to spend any time coming back to that tile later on or send another unit over their at any point in the future (for scouting purposes). This definately makes sense if there is a forest NNN of where the warrior is now, but admittedly NN makes more sense if there is no forest.

I'm happy either way if there is no forest NNN, but if there is I would vote for NNE

 

[Memphus]

N N was the move. he is safe

 

[Ronnie1]

NOW I GET IT ! ! ! I forgot we could move 2 tiles in a single turn. Still need to see if there is seafood E if the desert tile.

 

[Memphus]

do we care about moving Barentsz (Warrior ) 1 tile E to see if there is seafood? or do we jsut accpet the city will have horses, wheat and gold?

 

[Krill]

I'd vote for E, then swing north the come home.