Grotius
Prince
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2002
- Messages
- 409
I'm playing PTW 1.27 Open, in my first GOTM, and I'm having fun. I'm not winning, but I'm having fun.
I can see why cracker said this would be a challenge, even on Monarch.
I chose to build Washington right on the starting square. My scout headed S and SW. Oof, Washington grew slowly. It took forever to make my first settler. It didn't help that I messed up my micromanagement of an interim build and wasted a few shields. By the time I cranked out that first painful settler, I'd probably mapped half the island! I built New York on the coast SE of Washington, near the happiness resource and flood plains and stuff. As of 2270 BC I still had only two cities; one of my slowest starts ever.
The only good news was that I saved up a lot of gold.
But finally I got a couple of granaries up, and my cities started cranking settlers. I founded Boston north of Washington, Philadelphia on the tip of the island east of New York, Chicago West of Washington -- and another city right next to the iron supply near the Brits. I was pretty surprised that I beat the other civs to that iron. It took about 3 horsemen to beat the volcano, which seemed to have a defense of 2.
Through most of the Ancient Age, I kept research at 10% and just bought tech and tried to trade to the other civs. I beat the other two civs to Literature, but I didn't have a shield-producing city that could build the Great Library in anything less than 55 turns, so I decided to sell Lit to the AI and focus on infrastructure and military instead.
I was about to attack two outlying English cities when one of them -- Oxford -- flipped and joined my empire. Even with Oxford, I still have only seven or eight cities. I'm still debating whether to attack England or hope to flip that other outlying city. I'd really rather make nice with England, hope to absorb another city or two culturally, and attack Spain -- but nasty Isabella has iron too, and she's got a bigger war machine than I do. Hmmph.

I chose to build Washington right on the starting square. My scout headed S and SW. Oof, Washington grew slowly. It took forever to make my first settler. It didn't help that I messed up my micromanagement of an interim build and wasted a few shields. By the time I cranked out that first painful settler, I'd probably mapped half the island! I built New York on the coast SE of Washington, near the happiness resource and flood plains and stuff. As of 2270 BC I still had only two cities; one of my slowest starts ever.

But finally I got a couple of granaries up, and my cities started cranking settlers. I founded Boston north of Washington, Philadelphia on the tip of the island east of New York, Chicago West of Washington -- and another city right next to the iron supply near the Brits. I was pretty surprised that I beat the other civs to that iron. It took about 3 horsemen to beat the volcano, which seemed to have a defense of 2.
Through most of the Ancient Age, I kept research at 10% and just bought tech and tried to trade to the other civs. I beat the other two civs to Literature, but I didn't have a shield-producing city that could build the Great Library in anything less than 55 turns, so I decided to sell Lit to the AI and focus on infrastructure and military instead.
I was about to attack two outlying English cities when one of them -- Oxford -- flipped and joined my empire. Even with Oxford, I still have only seven or eight cities. I'm still debating whether to attack England or hope to flip that other outlying city. I'd really rather make nice with England, hope to absorb another city or two culturally, and attack Spain -- but nasty Isabella has iron too, and she's got a bigger war machine than I do. Hmmph.