JFD
Kathigitarkh
Viregel for PM.
With that title, Canute needs to be done Though I can imagine it would be a tad controversial if applied to the UK... anyway, I swear someone is working on him already, but if not, I'd be willing to attempt it.
And who are " we"?
lol we are
Spoiler :
Hiram's historical background for some of the civs does my freaking nut. Cornwall and druids argh. Although I love the fact cornwall is based on the hundreds and the 16th century uprising.There is also the Celtic Civilizations split by Hiram that features Wales, Cornwall and Ireland, and a Northumbria civ by DJSHenninger.
I agree, a Danelaw Civ would be really cool. I haven't used the Northumbria Civ yet, but have used the Anglo-Saxons a few times.
The others that need addressing are Kent, Wessex, Essex, Sussex, and East Anglia.
That shouild be the Arctic Ocean. The Atlantic ends at Iceland.
Ugh Oceans are weirdYou could write "Norwegian Sea". Arctic Ocean begins more to the north.
On a sidenote, why is Molde on that map? Was it that significant?
Lemme see...When you get past the different spelling for things, England back then was already England, so was Sweden (At very least in the geographical sense of lands who had swedes living in it), so was Denmark, and Scotland and Ireland (Obviously not as an unified state) too I think. Norway was... Norge? I think? And I have no idea about Wales (Powys?). So that makes only two with modern names. Anyway I can't see anything wrong with having a HRE label instead of "Germany", especially since the HRE had much more than just Germany while the rest of these countries occupy mostly the same regions to this day.Loving the North Sea Empire, guys. One question however, why on the map are most of the countries given modern names but the area of the Holy Roman empire not?
What about Trondheim/Nidaros instead of Molde? Much more significant.
cant' have Essex or sussex without Kingdom of Kent, Seriously kent was controlling A HJUUUUUUUUGE amount of the trade coming into the up until the end of the 7th century. Especially as the Augustine Mission landed in kent.
Zantonius Hamm said:What about Trondheim/Nidaros instead of Molde? Much more significant.
Trondheim was the original capital of Norway before it was changed to Oslo, so that could give a better representation of the "seats" of control.
tarcisiocm said:I think that you misunderstood him, he said that Trondheim was a better choice than Molde, not the other way around.
(Unless your comment was about whether to use Trondheim or Nidaros, but they're the same city.)
Lemme see...When you get past the different spelling for things, England back then was already England, so was Sweden (At very least in the geographical sense of lands who had swedes living in it), so was Denmark, and Scotland and Ireland (Obviously not as an unified state) too I think. Norway was... Norge? I think? And I have no idea about Wales (Powys?). So that makes only two with modern names. Anyway I can't see anything wrong with having a HRE label instead of "Germany", especially since the HRE had much more than just Germany while the rest of these countries occupy mostly the same regions to this day.
Yeah thats right that was the Augustine MissionThe first Anglo-Saxon king to be baptized was from Kent (Æthelbert?), also.
Yeah thats right that was the Augustine Mission