Cryptic_Snow
Prince
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2006
- Messages
- 435
The pre-season will do a better job than that silliness will.
...have you watched the preseason? Hard Knocks is honestly a fair bit better at presenting actual football.
Ayup, I watched quite a bit of it last night. It was 'actual football' simply mostly involving the 2nd and 3rd stringers of most teams, but was still actual football nonetheless.
I think it's hilarious that you would say a few reps for second and third stringers is more footbally than a film crew following around those exact same players through training camp and figuring out the storylines behind those depth chart battles.
The only way preseason football is remotely interesting is if you're actually following your own team's storylines to the point where you actually know who all these third stringers are, and who they are fighting for roster spots.
In other words, preseason football requires you to already be amped up. It does not amp you up.
I've never alleged you said that, either, dude.
But I stand by my point that unless you follow training camp, preseason football is worse than meaningless. It's literally only about the personal confrontations, the storylines of who's fighting for which spot. Coaches don't even call the "right" plays.
We've already had more than a few injuries in these pre-season games to starters that could indeed affect the regular season.
I guess you think that's 'meaningless'. I don't.
To each his own I guess.
So you watch it to follow the injury news?
I think you misunderstood me again, which is odd, seeing how the sentence only had two clauses. But once again -- the reason why watching it would be meaningless to a casual fan (or worse than meaningless) is because it's about positional battles, and the plays, formations, and scorelines have little to no bearing on how a team will do in the regular season. Now, you are correct that there is some significant injury news BUT -- that's not a reason in and of itself to watch these games, seeing as injury news is frequently delivered in a dozen other ways. Do you also religiously go to your team's practices to double check and make sure no one's gotten hurt?
And with exceptions because certain teams treat the preseason differently. Those who are looking to see who to draft in fantasy can read blogs to assimilate information about who might be a good starter more efficiently. I knew Eddie Lacy was a superb runner and added a whole new dimension to the Packers' offense long before I saw their preseason game against the Rams. Not that the latter wasn't pleasant -- but it no more amped me up for football than Hard Knocks did, even though the series follows a team I have no particularly strong feelings for in a division and even a conference I care little about.
In sum, your original statement of "that silliness" is utterly unmerited because watching preseason football is just as silly.
Not in the least. Hard knocks is only watched by a fraction of the people watching the pre-season games. As such its ability to 'pump up' people for football pales in comparison with the pre-season.
How the hell are people who call themselves adults having this argument? Jesus christ.
Popularity =/= an argument.
I personally find it hilarious.![]()
It's more of an argument than you have.Besides, it's directly relevant to the 'pumped' factor that the entire argument was about.
I did for a bit, but it's losing it's fun as I've won the debate. Ah well.